- Dec 17, 2022
-
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
This reverts commit ac540899 because it causes loss of keyboard on HP 15-da1xxx. Fixes: ac540899 ("Input: synaptics - switch touchpad on HP Laptop 15-da3001TU to RMI mode") Reported-by:
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/824effa5-8b9a-c28a-82bb-9b0ab24623e1@kernel.org Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206358 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
-
- Dec 13, 2022
-
-
Dmitry Torokhov authored
Prepare input updates for 6.2 merge window.
-
- Dec 09, 2022
-
-
Douglas Anderson authored
The elan touchscreen datasheet says that the reset GPIO only needs to be asserted for 500us in order to reset the regulator. The problem is that some boards need a level shifter between the signals on the GPIO controller and the signals on the touchscreen. All of these extra components on the line can slow the transition of the signals. On one board, we measured the reset line and saw that it took almost 1.8ms to go low. Even after we bumped up the "drive strength" of the signal from the default 2mA to 8mA we still saw it take 421us for the signal to go low. In order to account for this let's lengthen the amount of time that we keep the reset asserted. Let's bump it up from 500us to 5000us. That's still a relatively short amount of time and is much safer. It should be noted that this fixes real problems. Case in point: 1. The touchscreen power rail may be shared with another device (like an eDP panel). That means that at probe time power might already be on. 2. In probe we grab the reset GPIO and assert it (make it low). 3. We turn on power (a noop since it was already on). 4. We wait 500us. 5. We deassert the reset GPIO. With the above case and only a 500us delay we saw only a partial reset asserted, which is bad. Giving it 5ms is overkill but feels safer in case someone else has a different level shifter setup. Note that bumping up the delay to 5000 means that some configs yell about using udelay(). We'll change to using usleep_range(). We give a small range here because: - This isn't a delay that happens very often so we don't need to worry about giving a big range to allow for power efficiency. - usleep_range() is known to almost always pick the upper bound and delay that long and we really don't want to slow down the power on of the touchscreen that much. Signed-off-by:
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221208180603.v2.5.I6edfb3f459662c041563a54e5b7df727c27caaba@changeid Signed-off-by:
-
Luca Weiss authored
Convert the drv260x haptics binding to DT schema format. The only notable change from .txt format is that vbat-supply is not actually required, so don't make it a required property. Acked-by:
Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz> Reviewed-by:
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118174831.69793-1-luca@z3ntu.xyz Signed-off-by:
-
Fabio Estevam authored
Convert the bindings from plain text to yaml schema. Signed-off-by:
Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> Reviewed-by:
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by:
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120012135.2085631-1-festevam@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
- Dec 08, 2022
-
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
The functions using this data were protected with #ifdef CONFIG_JOYSTICK_PSXPAD_SPI_FF. Do the same for the data used only in those functions. Signed-off-by:
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221204180841.2211588-33-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
Used to test the PM changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
Used to build test the PM changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
Used to build test PM changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
Used to test the PM changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
Used to build test PM changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221204180841.2211588-19-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the ifdef guards. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221204180841.2211588-11-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221204180841.2211588-4-jic23@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
Jonathan Cameron authored
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection against used function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr() and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings. Signed-off-by:
-
- Dec 03, 2022
-
-
Zhang Xiaoxu authored
There is a kmemleak when test the raydium_i2c_ts with bpf mock device: unreferenced object 0xffff88812d3675a0 (size 8): comm "python3", pid 349, jiffies 4294741067 (age 95.695s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 11 0e 10 c0 01 00 04 00 ........ backtrace: [<0000000068427125>] __kmalloc+0x46/0x1b0 [<0000000090180f91>] raydium_i2c_send+0xd4/0x2bf [raydium_i2c_ts] [<000000006e631aee>] raydium_i2c_initialize.cold+0xbc/0x3e4 [raydium_i2c_ts] [<00000000dc6fcf38>] raydium_i2c_probe+0x3cd/0x6bc [raydium_i2c_ts] [<00000000a310de16>] i2c_device_probe+0x651/0x680 [<00000000f5a96bf3>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0 [<00000000096ba499>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170 [<00000000c5acb4d9>] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120 [<00000000264fe082>] __device_attach_driver+0xf7/0x150 [<00000000f919423c>] bus_for_each_drv+0x114/0x180 [<00000000e067feca>] __device_attach+0x1e5/0x2d0 [<0000000054301fc2>] bus_probe_device+0x126/0x140 [<00000000aad93b22>] device_add+0x810/0x1130 [<00000000c086a53f>] i2c_new_client_device+0x352/0x4e0 [<000000003c2c248c>] of_i2c_register_device+0xf1/0x110 [<00000000ffec4177>] of_i2c_notify+0x100/0x160 unreferenced object 0xffff88812d3675c8 (size 8): comm "python3", pid 349, jiffies 4294741070 (age 95.692s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 22 00 36 2d 81 88 ff ff ".6-.... backtrace: [<0000000068427125>] __kmalloc+0x46/0x1b0 [<0000000090180f91>] raydium_i2c_send+0xd4/0x2bf [raydium_i2c_ts] [<000000001d5c9620>] raydium_i2c_initialize.cold+0x223/0x3e4 [raydium_i2c_ts] [<00000000dc6fcf38>] raydium_i2c_probe+0x3cd/0x6bc [raydium_i2c_ts] [<00000000a310de16>] i2c_device_probe+0x651/0x680 [<00000000f5a96bf3>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0 [<00000000096ba499>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170 [<00000000c5acb4d9>] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120 [<00000000264fe082>] __device_attach_driver+0xf7/0x150 [<00000000f919423c>] bus_for_each_drv+0x114/0x180 [<00000000e067feca>] __device_attach+0x1e5/0x2d0 [<0000000054301fc2>] bus_probe_device+0x126/0x140 [<00000000aad93b22>] device_add+0x810/0x1130 [<00000000c086a53f>] i2c_new_client_device+0x352/0x4e0 [<000000003c2c248c>] of_i2c_register_device+0xf1/0x110 [<00000000ffec4177>] of_i2c_notify+0x100/0x160 After BANK_SWITCH command from i2c BUS, no matter success or error happened, the tx_buf should be freed. Fixes: 3b384bd6 ("Input: raydium_ts_i2c - do not split tx transactions") Signed-off-by:Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202103412.2120169-1-zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it can be trivially converted. Signed-off-by:
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-268-uwe@kleine-koenig.org Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it can be trivially converted. Signed-off-by:
-
