1. Oct 03, 2023
    • Mathias Krause's avatar
      drm/i915: Register engines early to avoid type confusion · 2b562f03
      Mathias Krause authored
      Commit 1ec23ed7
      
       ("drm/i915: Use uabi engines for the default engine
      map") switched from using for_each_engine() to for_each_uabi_engine() to
      iterate over the user engines. While this seems to be a sensible change,
      it's only safe to do when the engines are actually chained using the
      rb-tree structure which is not the case during early driver
      initialization where it can be either a lock-less list or regular
      double-linked list.
      
      In fact, the modesetting initialization code may end up calling
      default_engines() through the fb helper code while the engines list
      is still llist_node-based:
      
        i915_driver_probe() ->
          intel_display_driver_probe() ->
            intel_fbdev_init() ->
              drm_fb_helper_init() ->
                drm_client_init() ->
                  drm_client_open() ->
                    drm_file_alloc() ->
                      i915_driver_open() ->
                        i915_gem_open() ->
                          i915_gem_context_open() ->
                            i915_gem_create_context() ->
                              default_engines()
      
      Using for_each_uabi_engine() in default_engines() is therefore wrong, as
      it would try to interpret the llist as rb-tree, making it find no engine
      at all, as the rb_left and rb_right members will still be NULL, as they
      haven't been initialized yet.
      
      To fix this type confusion register the engines earlier and at the same
      time reduce the amount of code that has to deal with the intermediate
      llist state.
      
      Reported-by: sanity checks in grsecurity
      Suggested-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Fixes: 1ec23ed7
      
       ("drm/i915: Use uabi engines for the default engine map")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
      Cc: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230928182019.10256-2-minipli@grsecurity.net
      [tursulin: fixed commit tag typo]
      2b562f03
  2. Sep 30, 2023
  3. Sep 29, 2023
  4. Sep 28, 2023
  5. Sep 27, 2023
    • Tvrtko Ursulin's avatar
      drm/i915: Do not disable preemption for resets · 1e975e59
      Tvrtko Ursulin authored
      Commit ade8a0f5 ("drm/i915: Make all GPU resets atomic") added a
      preempt disable section over the hardware reset callback to prepare the
      driver for being able to reset from atomic contexts.
      
      In retrospect I can see that the work item at a time was about removing
      the struct mutex from the reset path. Code base also briefly entertained
      the idea of doing the reset under stop_machine in order to serialize
      userspace mmap and temporary glitch in the fence registers (see
      eb8d0f5a ("drm/i915: Remove GPU reset dependence on struct_mutex"),
      but that never materialized and was soon removed in 2caffbf1
      
      
      ("drm/i915: Revoke mmaps and prevent access to fence registers across
      reset") and replaced with a SRCU based solution.
      
      As such, as far as I can see, today we still have a requirement that
      resets must not sleep (invoked from submission tasklets), but no need to
      support invoking them from a truly atomic context.
      
      Given that the preemption section is problematic on RT kernels, since the
      uncore lock becomes a sleeping lock and so is invalid in such section,
      lets try and remove it. Potential downside is that our short waits on GPU
      to complete the reset may get extended if CPU scheduling interferes, but
      in practice that probably isn't a deal breaker.
      
      In terms of mechanics, since the preemption disabled block is being
      removed we just need to replace a few of the wait_for_atomic macros into
      busy looping versions which will work (and not complain) when called from
      non-atomic sections.
      
      v2:
       * Fix timeouts which are now in us. (Andi)
       * Update one comment as a drive by. (Andi)
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230926100855.61722-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
      1e975e59
  6. Sep 26, 2023
  7. Sep 25, 2023
  8. Sep 22, 2023
  9. Sep 21, 2023
  10. Sep 20, 2023
  11. Sep 16, 2023
  12. Sep 14, 2023
  13. Sep 13, 2023
  14. Sep 09, 2023
  15. Sep 08, 2023
  16. Sep 01, 2023
  17. Aug 30, 2023
  18. Aug 29, 2023
  19. Aug 23, 2023