inline TypeDecls during SMT translation
Since we've resolved all types at this point, it seems straightforward to simply emit the underlying type of a TypeExprID instead of just the ID. This should let us (1) trivially support any kind of TypeExprID and (2) support SMT solvers that don't understand define-sort, which we would have had to use going forwards.
parent
461e4efc
Please register or sign in to comment