RISCV Sail Model ================ This repository contains a formal specification of the RISC-V architecture, written in [Sail](https://github.com/rems-project/sail). It has been adopted by the RISC-V Foundation. As of 2021-08-24, the repo has been moved from to . The model specifies assembly language formats of the instructions, the corresponding encoders and decoders, and the instruction semantics. The current status of its coverage of the prose RISC-V specification is summarized [here](doc/Status.md). A [reading guide](doc/ReadingGuide.md) to the model is provided in the [doc/](doc/) subdirectory, along with a guide on [how to extend](doc/ExtendingGuide.md) the model. Latex or AsciiDoc definitions can be generated from the model that are suitable for inclusion in reference documentation. Drafts of the RISC-V [unprivileged](https://github.com/rems-project/riscv-isa-manual/blob/sail/release/riscv-spec-sail-draft.pdf) and [privileged](https://github.com/rems-project/riscv-isa-manual/blob/sail/release/riscv-privileged-sail-draft.pdf) specifications that include the Sail formal definitions are available in the sail branch of this [risc-v-isa-manual repository](https://github.com/rems-project/riscv-isa-manual/tree/sail). The process to perform this inclusion is explained [here](https://github.com/rems-project/riscv-isa-manual/blob/sail/README.SAIL). There is also the newer [Sail AsciiDoctor documentation support for RISC-V](https://github.com/Alasdair/asciidoctor-sail/blob/master/doc/built/sail_to_asciidoc.pdf). This is one of [several formal models](https://github.com/riscv/ISA_Formal_Spec_Public_Review/blob/master/comparison_table.md) that were compared within the 2019 [RISC-V ISA Formal Spec Public Review](https://github.com/riscv/ISA_Formal_Spec_Public_Review). What is Sail? ------------- [Sail](https://github.com/rems-project/sail) is a language for describing the instruction-set architecture (ISA) semantics of processors: the architectural specification of the behaviour of machine instructions. Sail is an engineer-friendly language, much like earlier vendor pseudocode, but more precisely defined and with tooling to support a wide range of use-cases.

Given a Sail specification, the tool can type-check it, generate documentation snippets (in LaTeX or AsciiDoc), generate executable emulators (in C or OCaml), show specification coverage, generate versions of the ISA for relaxed memory model tools, support automated instruction-sequence test generation, generate theorem-prover definitions for interactive proof (in Isabelle, HOL4, and Coq), support proof about binary code (in Islaris), and (in progress) generate a reference ISA model in SystemVerilog that can be used for formal hardware verification.

Sail is being used for multiple ISA descriptions, including essentially complete versions of the sequential behaviour of Arm-A (automatically derived from the authoritative Arm-internal specification, and released under a BSD Clear licence with Arm's permission), RISC-V, CHERI-RISC-V, CHERIoT, MIPS, and CHERI-MIPS; all these are complete enough to boot various operating systems. There are also Sail models for smaller fragments of IBM POWER and x86, including a version of the ACL2 x86 model automatically translated from that. Example RISC-V instruction specifications ---------------------------------- These are verbatim excerpts from the model file containing the base instructions, [riscv_insts_base.sail](https://github.com/riscv/sail-riscv/blob/master/model/riscv_insts_base.sail), with a few comments added. ### ITYPE (or ADDI) ~~~~~ /* the assembly abstract syntax tree (AST) clause for the ITYPE instructions */ union clause ast = ITYPE : (bits(12), regbits, regbits, iop) /* the encode/decode mapping between AST elements and 32-bit words */ mapping encdec_iop : iop <-> bits(3) = { RISCV_ADDI <-> 0b000, RISCV_SLTI <-> 0b010, RISCV_SLTIU <-> 0b011, RISCV_ANDI <-> 0b111, RISCV_ORI <-> 0b110, RISCV_XORI <-> 0b100 } mapping clause encdec = ITYPE(imm, rs1, rd, op) <-> imm @ rs1 @ encdec_iop(op) @ rd @ 0b0010011 /* the execution semantics for the ITYPE instructions */ function clause execute (ITYPE (imm, rs1, rd, op)) = { let rs1_val = X(rs1); let immext : xlenbits = EXTS(imm); let result : xlenbits = match op { RISCV_ADDI => rs1_val + immext, RISCV_SLTI => EXTZ(rs1_val <_s immext), RISCV_SLTIU => EXTZ(rs1_val <_u immext), RISCV_ANDI => rs1_val & immext, RISCV_ORI => rs1_val | immext, RISCV_XORI => rs1_val ^ immext }; X(rd) = result; true } /* the assembly/disassembly mapping between AST elements and strings */ mapping itype_mnemonic : iop <-> string = { RISCV_ADDI <-> "addi", RISCV_SLTI <-> "slti", RISCV_SLTIU <-> "sltiu", RISCV_XORI <-> "xori", RISCV_ORI <-> "ori", RISCV_ANDI <-> "andi" } mapping clause assembly = ITYPE(imm, rs1, rd, op) <-> itype_mnemonic(op) ^ spc() ^ reg_name(rd) ^ sep() ^ reg_name(rs1) ^ sep() ^ hex_bits_12(imm) ~~~~~~ ### SRET ~~~~~ union clause ast = SRET : unit mapping clause encdec = SRET() <-> 0b0001000 @ 0b00010 @ 0b00000 @ 0b000 @ 0b00000 @ 0b1110011 function clause execute SRET() = { match cur_privilege { User => handle_illegal(), Supervisor => if mstatus.TSR() == true then handle_illegal() else nextPC = handle_exception(cur_privilege, CTL_SRET(), PC), Machine => nextPC = handle_exception(cur_privilege, CTL_SRET(), PC) }; false } mapping clause assembly = SRET() <-> "sret" ~~~~~ Sequential execution ---------- The model builds OCaml and C emulators that can execute RISC-V ELF files, and both emulators provide platform support sufficient to boot Linux, FreeBSD and seL4. The OCaml emulator can generate its own platform device-tree description, while the C emulator currently requires a consistent description to be manually provided. The C emulator can be linked against the Spike emulator for execution with per-instruction tandem-verification. The C emulator, for the Linux boot, currently runs at approximately 300 KIPS on an Intel i7-7700 (when detailed per-instruction tracing is disabled), and there are many opportunities for future optimisation (the Sail MIPS model runs at approximately 1 MIPS). This enables one to boot Linux in about 4 minutes, and FreeBSD in about 2 minutes. Memory usage for the C emulator when booting Linux is approximately 140MB. The files in the OCaml and C emulator directories implement ELF loading and the platform devices, define the physical memory map, and use command-line options to select implementation-specific ISA choices. ### Use for specification coverage measurement in testing The Sail-generated C emulator can measure specification branch coverage of any executed tests, displaying the results as per-file tables and as html-annotated versions of the model source. ### Use as test oracle in tandem verification For tandem verification of random instruction streams, the tools support the protocols used in [TestRIG](https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/TestRIG) to directly inject instructions into the C emulator and produce trace information in RVFI format. This has been used for cross testing against spike and the [RVBS](https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/RVBS) specification written in Bluespec SystemVerilog. The C emulator can also be directly linked to Spike, which provides tandem-verification on ELF binaries (including OS boots). This is often useful in debugging OS boot issues in the model when the boot is known working on Spike. It is also useful to detect platform-specific implementation choices in Spike that are not mandated by the ISA specification. Concurrent execution -------------------- The ISA model is integrated with the operational model of the RISC-V relaxed memory model, RVWMO (as described in an appendix of the [RISC-V user-level specification](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/tag/draft-20181227-c6741cb)), which is one of the reference models used in the development of the RISC-V concurrency architecture; this is part of the [RMEM](http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/pes20/rmem) tool. It is also integrated with the RISC-V axiomatic concurrency model as part of the [isla-axiomatic](https://isla-axiomatic.cl.cam.ac.uk/) tool. ### Concurrent testing As part of the University of Cambridge/ INRIA concurrency architecture work, those groups produced and released a library of approximately 7000 [litmus tests](https://github.com/litmus-tests/litmus-tests-riscv). The operational and axiomatic RISC-V concurrency models are in sync for these tests, and they moreover agree with the corresponding ARM architected behaviour for the tests in common. Those tests have also been run on RISC-V hardware, on a SiFive RISC-V FU540 multicore proto board (Freedom Unleashed), kindly on loan from Imperas. To date, only sequentially consistent behaviour was observed there. Use in test generation ---------------------- The Sail OCaml backend can produce QuickCheck-style random generators for types in Sail specifications, which have been used to produce random instructions sequences for testing. The generation of individual types can be overridden by the developer to, for example, remove implementation-specific instructions or introduce register biasing. Generating theorem-prover definitions -------------------------------------- Sail aims to support the generation of idiomatic theorem prover definitions across multiple tools. At present it supports Isabelle, HOL4 and Coq, and the `prover_snapshots` directory provides snapshots of the generated theorem prover definitions. These theorem-prover translations can target multiple monads for different purposes. The first is a state monad with nondeterminism and exceptions, suitable for reasoning in a sequential setting, assuming that effectful expressions are executed without interruptions and with exclusive access to the state. For reasoning about concurrency, where instructions execute out-of-order, speculatively, and non-atomically, there is a free monad over an effect datatype of memory actions. This monad is also used as part of the aforementioned concurrency support via the RMEM tool. The files under `handwritten_support` provide library definitions for Coq, Isabelle and HOL4. Directory Structure ------------------- ``` sail-riscv - model // Sail specification modules - generated_definitions // files generated by Sail, in RV32 and RV64 subdirectories - c - ocaml - lem - isabelle - coq - hol4 - latex - prover_snapshots // snapshots of generated theorem prover definitions - handwritten_support // prover support files - c_emulator // supporting platform files for C emulator - ocaml_emulator // supporting platform files for OCaml emulator - doc // documentation, including a reading guide - test // test files - riscv-tests // snapshot of tests from the riscv/riscv-tests github repo - os-boot // information and sample files for booting OS images ``` Getting started --------------- ### Building the model Install [Sail](https://github.com/rems-project/sail/) [using opam](https://github.com/rems-project/sail/blob/sail2/INSTALL.md) then: ``` $ make ``` will build the 64-bit OCaml simulator in `ocaml_emulator/riscv_ocaml_sim_RV64`, the C simulator in `c_emulator/riscv_sim_RV64`, the Isabelle model in `generated_definitions/isabelle/RV64/Riscv.thy`, the Coq model in `generated_definitions/coq/RV64/riscv.v`, and the HOL4 model in `generated_definitions/hol4/RV64/riscvScript.sml`. One can build either the RV32 or the RV64 model by specifying `ARCH=RV32` or `ARCH=RV64` on the `make` line, and using the matching target suffix. RV64 is built by default, but the RV32 model can be built using: ``` $ ARCH=RV32 make ``` which creates the 32-bit OCaml simulator in `ocaml_emulator/riscv_ocaml_sim_RV32`, and the C simulator in `c_emulator/riscv_sim_RV32`, and the prover models in the corresponding `RV32` subdirectories. The Makefile targets `riscv_isa_build`, `riscv_coq_build`, and `riscv_hol_build` invoke the respective prover to process the definitions. We have tested Isabelle 2018, Coq 8.8.1, and HOL4 Kananaskis-12. When building these targets, please make sure the corresponding prover libraries in the Sail directory (`$SAIL_DIR/lib/$prover`) are up-to-date and built, e.g. by running `make` in those directories. ### Executing test binaries The C and OCaml simulators can be used to execute small test binaries. The OCaml simulator depends on the Device Tree Compiler package, which can be installed in Ubuntu with: ``` $ sudo apt-get install device-tree-compiler ``` Then, you can run test binaries: ``` $ ./ocaml_emulator/riscv_ocaml_sim_ $ ./c_emulator/riscv_sim_ ``` A suite of RV32 and RV64 test programs derived from the [`riscv-tests`](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-tests) test-suite is included under [test/riscv-tests/](test/riscv-tests/). The test-suite can be run using `test/run_tests.sh`. ### Configuring platform options Some information on additional configuration options for each simulator is available from `./ocaml_emulator/riscv_ocaml_sim_ -h` and `./c_emulator/riscv_sim_ -h`. Some useful options are: configuring whether misaligned accesses trap (`--enable-misaligned` for C and `-enable-misaligned` for OCaml), and whether page-table walks update PTE bits (`--enable-dirty-update` for C and `-enable-dirty-update` for OCaml). ### Experimental integration with riscv-config There is also (as yet unmerged) support for [integration with riscv-config](https://github.com/rems-project/sail-riscv/pull/43) to allow configuring the compiled model according to a riscv-config yaml specification. ### Booting OS images For booting operating system images, see the information under the [os-boot/](os-boot/) subdirectory. ### Using development versions of Sail Rarely, the version of Sail packaged in opam may not meet your needs. This could happen if you need a bug fix or new feature not yet in the released Sail version, or you are actively working on Sail. In this case you can tell the `sail-riscv` `Makefile` to use a local copy of Sail by setting `SAIL_DIR` to the root of a checkout of the Sail repo when you invoke `make`. Alternatively, you can use `opam pin` to install Sail from a local checkout of the Sail repo as described in the Sail installation instructions. Licence ------- The model is made available under the BSD two-clause licence in LICENCE. Authors ------- Prashanth Mundkur, SRI International; Rishiyur S. Nikhil (Bluespec Inc.); Jon French, University of Cambridge; Brian Campbell, University of Edinburgh; Robert Norton-Wright, University of Cambridge and Microsoft; Alasdair Armstrong, University of Cambridge; Thomas Bauereiss, University of Cambridge; Shaked Flur, University of Cambridge; Christopher Pulte, University of Cambridge; Peter Sewell, University of Cambridge; Alexander Richardson, University of Cambridge; Hesham Almatary, University of Cambridge; Jessica Clarke, University of Cambridge; Nathaniel Wesley Filardo, Microsoft; Peter Rugg, University of Cambridge; Scott Johnson, Aril Computer Corp. Funding ------- This software was developed by the above within the Rigorous Engineering of Mainstream Systems (REMS) project, partly funded by EPSRC grant EP/K008528/1, at the Universities of Cambridge and Edinburgh. This software was developed by SRI International and the University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory (Department of Computer Science and Technology) under DARPA/AFRL contract FA8650-18-C-7809 ("CIFV"), and under DARPA contract HR0011-18-C-0016 ("ECATS") as part of the DARPA SSITH research programme. This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 789108, ELVER).