aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/COPYRIGHT
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-03-22slirp: is not maintained by Kelly Price for a long timeMarc-André Lureau1-2/+0
slirp has been maintained by the QEMU maintainers and will be maintained under an independent project soon. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kelly Price <strredwolf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
2019-03-22slirp: update COPYRIGHT to use full 3-Clause BSD LicenseMarc-André Lureau1-0/+3
According to commit 2f5f89963186d42a7ded253bc6cf5b32abb45cec ("Remove the advertising clause from the slirp license"), Danny Gasparovski gave permission to license slirp code under 3-clause BSD license: Subject: RE: Slirp license Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:51:00 +1100 From: "Gasparovski, Daniel" <Daniel.Gasparovski@ato.gov.au> To: "Richard Fontana" <rfontana@redhat.com> I have no objection to having Slirp code in QEMU be licensed under the 3-clause BSD license. slirp/COPYRIGHT's initial version in 2004 (commit 5fafdf24) listed only 3 clauses BUT used the poisonous advertising clause for clause 3 which is the controversial clause of non-free 4-clause (that is, it appears that the BSD-4 license was copied, and then the WRONG clause was deleted, when creating COPYRIGHT. Perhaps explained as an easy mistake to make since 3-clause was created by removing clause 3 of the 4-clause, where you sometimes see the three-clause version with clauses 1, 2, 4; but more commonly see a renumbered version with clauses 1, 2, 3 to close the gap. If you pay attention only to clause numbers instead of content, it can be easy to confuse which clause to delete to go from 4-clause to 3-clause). Commit 2f5f89963 removed the poisonous wrong clause on the grounds of moving from 4-clause to 3-clause; but did not add the missing clause, which makes it LOOK like the 2-clause version. But I think we have a decent enough trail showing the intent for 3-clause. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
2009-01-26Remove the advertising clause from the slirp licensealiguori1-3/+0
According to the FSF, the 4-clause BSD license, which slirp is covered under, is not compatible with the GPL or LGPL[1]. [1] http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses There are three declared copyright holders in slirp that use the 4-clause BSD license, the Regents of UC Berkley, Danny Gasparovski, and Kelly Price. Below are the appropriate permissions to remove the advertise clause from slirp from each party. Special thanks go to Richard Fontana from Red Hat for contacting all of the necessary authors to resolve this issue! Regents of UC Berkley: From ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change July 22, 1999 To All Licensees, Distributors of Any Version of BSD: As you know, certain of the Berkeley Software Distribution ("BSD") source code files require that further distributions of products containing all or portions of the software, acknowledge within their advertising materials that such products contain software developed by UC Berkeley and its contributors. Specifically, the provision reads: " * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software * must display the following acknowledgement: * This product includes software developed by the University of * California, Berkeley and its contributors." Effective immediately, licensees and distributors are no longer required to include the acknowledgement within advertising materials. Accordingly, the foregoing paragraph of those BSD Unix files containing it is hereby deleted in its entirety. William Hoskins Director, Office of Technology Licensing University of California, Berkeley Danny Gasparovski: Subject: RE: Slirp license Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:51:00 +1100 From: "Gasparovski, Daniel" <Daniel.Gasparovski@ato.gov.au> To: "Richard Fontana" <rfontana@redhat.com> Hi Richard, I have no objection to having Slirp code in QEMU be licensed under the 3-clause BSD license. Thanks for taking the effort to consult me about this. Dan ... Kelly Price: Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:38:56 -0500 From: "Kelly Price" <strredwolf@gmail.com> To: "Richard Fontana" <rfontana@redhat.com> Subject: Re: Slirp license Thanks for contacting me, Richard. I'm glad you were able to find Dan, as I've been "keeping the light on" for Slirp. I have no use for it now, and I have little time for it (now holding onto Keenspot's Comic Genesis and having a regular US state government position). If Dan would like to return to the project, I'd love to give it back to him. As for copyright, I don't own all of it. Dan does, so I will defer to him. Any of my patches I will gladly license to the 3-part BSD license. My interest in re-licensing was because we didn't have ready info to contact Dan. If Dan would like to port Slirp back out of QEMU, a lot of us 64-bit users would be grateful. Feel free to share this email address with Dan. I will be glad to effect a transfer of the project to him and Mr. Bellard of the QEMU project. Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6451 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
2007-09-16find -type f | xargs sed -i 's/[\t ]$//g' # on most filesths1-1/+1
git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@3173 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
2004-05-22added missing copyright filebellard1-0/+64
git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@846 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162