Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
While we'll 'never' have flash chips larger than 32bit, work was
recently done to blocklevel for it to be 64bit compatible for other
backends.
Since there is a 64bit ioctl() lets use it. There is currently no known
case where 32bit is not sufficient but this doesn't mean someone might
not do something strange in the future.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
These OPAL calls are exposing the host flash chip to linux as a flash
device. The host is expected to understand that it is raw flash and use
it appropriately, it isn't skiboots place to strip ecc bytes or perform
erase before writes.
Over the course of other developments blocklevel has gotten quite clever
but in this case the cleverness is inappropriate.
Fixes: https://github.com/open-power/skiboot/issues/44
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently the policy for calling ECC protecting a range at the
blocklevel layer is that the requested region be completely
unprotected otherwise the call will return an error. It turns out that
duplicate calls to ffs_init() with true as the last parameter (for the
same blocklevel structure) will cause duplicate attempts to
ecc_protect() ranges.
Change the policy within blocklevel to allow duplicate protecting.
In fact the new policy almost guarantees no failure (baring something
odd like malloc() failing). It will detect that the range is currently
already fully protected and do nothing, detect that part of the range
is or is not and extend the existing range or detect that a range fits
perfectly between two ranges in which case it will merge the ranges.
Also adjust tests to match the new policy.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The current flash code was written with only one flash chip, which is
a system_flash (ie. the PNOR image), in mind.
Now that we have mambo bogusdisk flash, we can have many flash chips.
This is resulting in some confusing output messages.
This reworks some of the error paths and warnings to make this more
coherent when we have multiple flash chips.
We assume everything can be a system flash, so I've removed the
is_system_flash parameter from flash_register(). We'll use the first
system flash we find and warn if we find another since discovery order
is not a guaranteed API.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This makes the size of flash 64 bit safe so that we can have flash
devices greater than 4GB. This is especially useful for mambo disks
passed through to Linux.
Fortunately the device tree interface and the linux device driver are
64bit safe so no changes are required there.
Userspace gard and flash tools are also updated to ensure "make check"
still passes.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
A function called "smart" doesn't give the user any clues as to why
they would want to use it over other calls.
This adds some documentation so users can determine when to best use
this call.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Run a small wrapper around some unit tests with the QTEST makefile macro
(QTEST=Quiet TEST). Also, wrap boot tests in mambo and qemu to be quiet
by default.
Both ./test/run.sh and the modified mambo/qemu test runner scripts output
full stdout and stderr in the event of error.
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Quite a lot of code relies on values read from flash. These values
shouldn't be totally trusted without at least basic sanity checks.
Fixes coverity bug: 119719
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
If we had a truncated file where libflash would attempt to read past
the end, instead of erroring out, we'd get stuck in an infinite loop.
Why? Because we weren't acknowledging that read() returns 0 on EOF.
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently these exist for some parts of the source tree, but not all of it. They're nice if you are only modifing code in a one part of the tree as the full test suite can be a little slow.
Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
When flash controllers get deconfigured or yanked out from under these
tools flash accesses tend to just return all 0xFF bytes.
libffs is usually the first thing to do reads and will fail parsing its
partition structures. This patch adds reporting when it fails to parse
because it got all 0xFF bytes.
The idea is that this will help debugging by splitting the possible reasons
for a failed init into 1) flash controller issue or reading erased flash 2)
flash corruption or not valid reading partition data. These two cases are
nice to be able to separate as early as possible as they usually mean two
quite different type of bugs.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
These 32MB chips are used in the Barreleye OpenBMC BMC.
Signed-off-by: Adriana Kobylak <anoo@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently the file backend will keep a file descriptor open until the
structure is destroyed. This is undesirable for daemons and long running
processes that only have a very occasional need to access the file. Keeping
the file open requires users of blocklevel to close and reinit their
structures every time, doing is isn't disastrous but can easily be
managed at the interface level.
This has been done at the blocklevel_device interface so as to provide
minimal changes to arch_flash_init().
At the moment there isn't a need for the actually flash driver to be able
to do this, this remains unimplmented there.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently there are two error cases that ffs_next_side() may hit and will
leave the return pointer untouched. This isn't a huge problem as the caller
should be checking the return value anyway but as we know, callers don't
always do that.
It doesn't hurt for ffs_next_side() to make it as clear as possible that it
encountered a problem.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Mendoza-Jonas <sam@mendozajonas.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Some confusion has arisen from the first consumer of ffs_cmp() in that they
expected a strcmp style less than one, zero or greater than one return value.
This has been addressed in this patch in two ways, by changing the return
type to a boolean in order to (attempt) to alert the programmer that this
is not the case and by renaming it to equal to avoid the implied comparison
and imply very much a boolean outcome.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Mendoza-Jonas <sam@mendozajonas.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Some FFS structures will have a partition called "OTHER_SIDE", this is a
pointer to another ffs TOC on which another ffs_handle can be instantiated.
Currently users of libffs would have to query for the presence of this
partition and then initialise a new ffs_handle themselves. As accessing the
"other" side appears to be becoming a common operation this convenience
function should prove useful.
Furthermore, it is possible for these multiTOC flash chips to be circular,
that is the "OTHER_SIDE" partition of 'secondary' TOC points back to the
initial TOC. The solution is to add a comparison function capable of
detecting when repeated calls to ffs_next_side() go full circle. It should
be noted here that this is all the comparator function is designed to
detect, it will not be able to detect two identical TOCs opened with
different blocklevel_devices as this would require the ability to compare
blocklevel_devices.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The utility of this function has been superceeded by blocklevel code and is
no longer called from anywhere, it can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Simply isn't used anymore since libffs knows how to use the blocklevel
interface.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This 32MB part is used for the Barreleye OpenBMC BMC.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This way it can be grep'd for.
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
In commit 8f5b8616, we introduced a dependency on libgcc, for the
__builtin_parityl() function in commit 6cfaa3ba.
However, if we're building with a biarch compiler, we may not have a
libgcc available.
This commit removes the __builtin_parityl() call, and replaces with the
equivalent instructions, and removes the dependency on libgcc.
Although this is untested, I have confirmed that the __builtin_parityl()
functions emits the same instructions (on power7 and power8, with
gcc-4.9) as we're using in the parity() function.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
[stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com: only use inline asm for skiboot build]
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam.mj@au1.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
CID 97867 (#1 of 1): Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
5. uninit_use: Using uninitialized value rc.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Blocklevel_smart_write() can write in a smart fashion which avoids the need
for the caller to erase the flash before writing, except it never actually
does the erase if it needs to.
Furthermore, a very simple optimisation can be made where it should detect
if it doesn't actually need to clear the flash, but still needs to write.
This optimisation is from flash_smart_write(), which, for reasons, should
continue to exist at least for now.
In the process, this also addresses a bug. blocklevel_smart_write()
operates on erase block covered by the write, detects to see if an erase
needs to be performed and if so, performs the erase and then performs the
write.
Currently blocklevel_smart_write() won't detect that a write can span two
erase blocks and that it should split this process in two. This patch fixes
that.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam.mj@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Previous work did away with some typesafety when adding the
blocklevel_device abstraction, this has resulted in the ability to
accidently call libflash low level code with a blocklevel_device which has
not been initialised by the libflash backend.
The end result will not be good. Best to reintroduce that low level calls
be called with libflashes own structures.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
In order to access the flash on ARM (presumably code running on a BMC), the
hardware is involved. In order to access the flash on POWER (presumably
code running on a host), opal calls through the Linux MTD driver are
involved. In order to access the flash on x86 (presumably on a
developer/admin system), you can't but it would be nice to be able to
manipulate data which has come from the flash or will go onto the flash.
The pflash and the gard tool both can read and write to the 'flash' and
with the introduction of the blocklevel interface the details of how the
flash is read from and written to is sufficiently abstracted that these
tools don't need to know what they're running on.
What does differ is the setup, and not by too much either. This common code
pulls out the setup of the flash hardware on ARM, the searching for the
appropriate MTD device on power and generic blocklevel device init for all
three architectures.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
There are some functions (notably: erase_chip and set_4b_mode) which cannot
be abstracted away by the blocklevel interface, this means that if they are
really needed (by pflash for example) then at the moment a program like
pflash would need to pass a blocklevel_device struct to libflash.
This forces libflash to trust that it was given a blocklevel that it did
init. If it didn't init it the container_of call will return junk and
libflash has no way to protect its self. This method (while very useful)
has destroyed type safety. As such, this commit reintroduces some
typesafety back into this stack.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
If an ECC check fails in blocklevel_read(), the return code from
blocklevel_read() won't be correct.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
See https://github.com/lucasdemarchi/codespel
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
fixes.
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Current packaging builds (which specify -O2) fail for me, with:
CC libffs.o
../../libflash/libffs.c: In function ffs_init:
../../libflash/libffs.c:149:8: error: start may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
rc = blocklevel_ecc_protect(bl, start, total_size);
^
../../libflash/libffs.c:149:8: error: total_size may be used uninitialized in
this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
../../libflash/libffs.c:148:7: error: ecc may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
if (ecc) {
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
This is because we're not checking for the return value of
ffs_part_info, which may return with start/total_size/ecc uninitialised.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Check for the return value from blocklevel_ecc_protect(), while
registering regions of the flash and log error incase the return
registration of region fails.
Fixes Coverity defect#101019
Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Fun-sized version of the MXxxL25635F.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Passing a flag on libffs init will register all regions of the flash with
ecc (as per the libffs partition information) as being ecc protected (or
not).
This saves the consumer needing to know or care about the presence of ecc.
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
writing
For consumers who can't do better or who aren't to phased about
performance, having to book keep erasing in order to be able to write data
can be painful. Blocklevel can do it, possibly naively but its a convenience
function
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The new backend for blocklevel does this in a much neater way as much this
hacky code is no longer needed.
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently libflash reads from files by using the dodgy file_flash.c which
implements a very flash hardware themed interface but subverts it to read,
write and erase from a file descriptor.
With the introduction of this file backend, this will no longer be needed.
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
It has become apparent that communication between blocklevel and its
backend may be necessarily, at least so that the backend can inform
blocklevel as to if an erase must be done before a write.
An erase before flag isn't strictly necessary as erases can be performed
regardless of whether they need to be or not, however, the caveat with that
is that when erases don't need to be performed, this is likely due to the
backend not having erase blocks and therefore it may be impossible to set a
sane value for erase blocks which would be used to erase before write.
This flag saves backends that don't need erases before write to have to lie
about an erase block size.
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
At the moment ECC reads and writes are still being handled by the low level
core of libflash. ECC should be none of libflashes concern, it is primarily
a hardware access backend.
It makes sense for blocklevel to take care of ECC but currently it has no
way of knowing. With some simple modifications (which are rudimentary at
the moment and will need a performance improvement) blocklevel can handle
ECC, and with a little more effort this can be extended to provide read and
write protection in blocklevel.
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The ecc 'memcpy' style functions return success or fail in terms of the ECC
enum. This doesn't really make sense, use true or false. As the result the
ecc enum doesn't need to be exposed anymore, which makes more sense, not
clear why it was exposed in the first place.
Convert some of the ecc #defines to static inlines, shouldn't make any
difference but feels safer.
Fix minor stylistic and typo issues.
Reviewed-By: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
uint64_t is a long long, the constants need the "ull" suffix.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Blocklevel has no way to check that backends init the erase_mask correctly
and as such must trust them.
When a user calls blocklevel_get_info(), blocklevel has a chance to inspect
the return value and warn if the values do not match. This check happens on
every call which should be fine as it is doubtful that
blocklevel_get_info() will be called much.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyril.bur@au1.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|