Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The behaviour of atoi/atol on glibc (and according to the spec) is
to assume base 10, not to autodetect the base.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
When autodetecting the base, the code would strip hex prefixes twice.
Now the string is not modified in the detection stage.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
This increases coverage of atoi, atol, strtol and strtoul to 100%.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Now it shows up as untested in lcov!
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|