Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
The behaviour of atoi/atol on glibc (and according to the spec) is
to assume base 10, not to autodetect the base.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
When autodetecting the base, the code would strip hex prefixes twice.
Now the string is not modified in the detection stage.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
|
Moving assert_fail() out of libc and into core/utils.c so that we can
sanely call prlog(PR_EMERG).
We shorten it from three fputs calls down to one prlog() call.
This may increase the number of cycles and stack usage for when we
hit an assert, which may not be desirable.
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
|