diff options
author | Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> | 2022-06-09 20:42:50 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> | 2022-12-11 18:28:38 -0500 |
commit | cbf4496434ef78f695c2ceca4e9e093ea14ab784 (patch) | |
tree | 3ede2506f5b82ca67ba87e9978c66d6b0c988cde /mesonbuild/interpreter/interpreter.py | |
parent | 248c1d9bd5a043ee4c0a28b895b064c758ac70ac (diff) | |
download | meson-cbf4496434ef78f695c2ceca4e9e093ea14ab784.zip meson-cbf4496434ef78f695c2ceca4e9e093ea14ab784.tar.gz meson-cbf4496434ef78f695c2ceca4e9e093ea14ab784.tar.bz2 |
simplify install_tag handling according to the accepted API
There are two problems here: a typing problem, and an algorithm problem.
We expect it to always be passed to CustomTarget() as a list, but we ran
list() on it, which became horribly mangled if you violated the types
and passed a string instead. This caused weird*er* errors and didn't
even do anything. We want to do all validation in the interpreter,
anyway, and make the build level dumb.
Meanwhile we type it as accepting a T.Sequence, which technically
permits... a string, actually. This isn't intentional; the point of
using T.Sequence is out of a misguided idea that APIs are supposed to be
"technically correct" by allowing "anything that fulfills an interface",
which is a flawed concept because we aren't using interfaces here, and
also because "technically string fulfills the same interface as a list,
if we're talking sequences".
Basically:
- mypy is broken by design, because it typechecks "python", not "what we
wish python to be"
- we do not actually need to graciously permit passing tuples instead of
lists
As far as historic implementations of this logic go, we have formerly:
- originally, typeslistified anything
- switched to accepting list from the interpreter, redundantly ran list()
on the list we got, and mishandling API violations passing a string
(commit 11f96380351a88059ec55f1070fdebc1b1033117)
- switched to accepting anything, stringlistifying it if it was not
`None`, mishandling `[None]`, and invoking list(x) on a brand new list
from stringlistify (commit 157d43883515507f42618b065a64fb26501734a0)
- stopped stringlistify, just accept T.List[str | None] and re-cast to
list, violates typing because we use/handle plain None too
(commit a8521fef70ef76fb742d80aceb2e9ed634bd6a70)
- break typing by declaring we accept a simple string, which still
results in mishandling by converting 'foo' -> ['f', 'o', 'o']
(commit ac576530c43734495815f22456596772a8f6a8cc)
All of this. ALL of it. Is because we tried to be fancy and say we
accept T.Tuple; the only version of this logic that has ever worked
correctly is the original untyped do-all-validation-in-the-build-phase
typeslistified version.
Let's just call it what it is. We want a list | None, and we handle it too.
Diffstat (limited to 'mesonbuild/interpreter/interpreter.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions