From 825146d13dc0430e72c1c65b61cb1aa35e559fca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Huth Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 10:12:09 +0200 Subject: Fix typos in various documentation and source files The typos have been discovered with the "codespell" utility. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Message-Id: <20190520081209.20415-1-thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Gibson --- README.license | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'README.license') diff --git a/README.license b/README.license index d56c88f..50e9fca 100644 --- a/README.license +++ b/README.license @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Licensing and contribution policy of dtc and libfdt This dtc package contains two pieces of software: dtc itself, and libfdt which comprises the files in the libfdt/ subdirectory. These two pieces of software, although closely related, are quite distinct. -dtc does not incoporate or rely on libfdt for its operation, nor vice +dtc does not incorporate or rely on libfdt for its operation, nor vice versa. It is important that these two pieces of software have different license conditions. @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ back to the libfdt mainline. While I hope that doesn't happen, I believe the goal of allowing libfdt to be widely used is more important than avoiding that. libfdt is quite small, and hardly rocket science; so the incentive for such impolite behaviour is small, -and the inconvenience caused therby is not dire. +and the inconvenience caused thereby is not dire. Licenses such as the LGPL which would allow code to be used in non-GPL software, but also require contributions to be returned were -- cgit v1.1