libfdt: Fix a possible "unchecked return value" warning

Apparently the unchecked return value of the first fdt_next_tag() call in
fdt_add_subnode_namelen() is tripping Coverity Scan in some circumstances,
although it appears not to for the scan on our project itself.

This fdt_next_tag() should always return FDT_BEGIN_NODE, since otherwise
the fdt_subnode_offset_namelen() above would have returned BADOFFSET or
BADSTRUCTURE.

Still, add a check to shut Coverity up, gated by a can_assume() to avoid
bloat in small builds.

Reported-by: Ryan Long <ryan.long@oarcorp.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions