From a4a411fbaf95b5712b30de6e65f37ff0aa6cb142 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:35:28 -0500 Subject: Replace "iothread lock" with "BQL" in comments MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The term "iothread lock" is obsolete. The APIs use Big QEMU Lock (BQL) in their names. Update the code comments to use "BQL" instead of "iothread lock". Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-5-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- util/rcu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'util') diff --git a/util/rcu.c b/util/rcu.c index bb7f633..fa32c94 100644 --- a/util/rcu.c +++ b/util/rcu.c @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static void rcu_init_complete(void) qemu_event_init(&rcu_call_ready_event, false); - /* The caller is assumed to have iothread lock, so the call_rcu thread + /* The caller is assumed to have BQL, so the call_rcu thread * must have been quiescent even after forking, just recreate it. */ qemu_thread_create(&thread, "call_rcu", call_rcu_thread, -- cgit v1.1