From ac7199a2523ce2ccf8e685087a5d177eeca89b09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Shan Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 22:03:00 +0800 Subject: qtest/numa-test: Specify CPU topology in aarch64_numa_cpu() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The CPU topology isn't enabled on arm/virt machine yet, but we're going to do it in next patch. After the CPU topology is enabled by next patch, "thread-id=1" becomes invalid because the CPU core is preferred on arm/virt machine. It means these two CPUs have 0/1 as their core IDs, but their thread IDs are all 0. It will trigger test failure as the following message indicates: [14/21 qemu:qtest+qtest-aarch64 / qtest-aarch64/numa-test ERROR 1.48s killed by signal 6 SIGABRT >>> G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh \ QTEST_QEMU_STORAGE_DAEMON_BINARY=./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon \ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-aarch64 \ QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=83 \ /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/tests/qtest/numa-test --tap -k ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― stderr: qemu-system-aarch64: -numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1: no match found This fixes the issue by providing comprehensive SMP configurations in aarch64_numa_cpu(). The SMP configurations aren't used before the CPU topology is enabled in next patch. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang Message-id: 20220503140304.855514-3-gshan@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell --- tests/qtest/numa-test.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tests') diff --git a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c index 749429d..976526e 100644 --- a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c +++ b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c @@ -223,7 +223,8 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data) QTestState *qts; g_autofree char *cli = NULL; - cli = make_cli(data, "-machine smp.cpus=2 " + cli = make_cli(data, "-machine " + "smp.cpus=2,smp.sockets=1,smp.clusters=1,smp.cores=1,smp.threads=2 " "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 " "-numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 " "-numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1"); -- cgit v1.1 From e280ecb39bc1629f74ea5479d464fd1608dc8f76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gavin Shan Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 22:03:02 +0800 Subject: qtest/numa-test: Correct CPU and NUMA association in aarch64_numa_cpu() In aarch64_numa_cpu(), the CPU and NUMA association is something like below. Two threads in the same core/cluster/socket are associated with two individual NUMA nodes, which is unreal as Igor Mammedov mentioned. We don't expect the association to break NUMA-to-socket boundary, which matches with the real world. NUMA-node socket cluster core thread ------------------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 This corrects the topology for CPUs and their association with NUMA nodes. After this patch is applied, the CPU and NUMA association becomes something like below, which looks real. Besides, socket/cluster/core/thread IDs are all checked when the NUMA node IDs are verified. It helps to check if the CPU topology is properly populated or not. NUMA-node socket cluster core thread ------------------------------------------ 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Suggested-by: Igor Mammedov Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan Acked-by: Igor Mammedov Message-id: 20220503140304.855514-5-gshan@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell --- tests/qtest/numa-test.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'tests') diff --git a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c index 976526e..c5eb13f 100644 --- a/tests/qtest/numa-test.c +++ b/tests/qtest/numa-test.c @@ -224,17 +224,17 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data) g_autofree char *cli = NULL; cli = make_cli(data, "-machine " - "smp.cpus=2,smp.sockets=1,smp.clusters=1,smp.cores=1,smp.threads=2 " + "smp.cpus=2,smp.sockets=2,smp.clusters=1,smp.cores=1,smp.threads=1 " "-numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram -numa node,nodeid=1 " - "-numa cpu,node-id=1,thread-id=0 " - "-numa cpu,node-id=0,thread-id=1"); + "-numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1,cluster-id=0,core-id=0,thread-id=0 " + "-numa cpu,node-id=1,socket-id=0,cluster-id=0,core-id=0,thread-id=0"); qts = qtest_init(cli); cpus = get_cpus(qts, &resp); g_assert(cpus); while ((e = qlist_pop(cpus))) { QDict *cpu, *props; - int64_t thread, node; + int64_t socket, cluster, core, thread, node; cpu = qobject_to(QDict, e); g_assert(qdict_haskey(cpu, "props")); @@ -242,12 +242,18 @@ static void aarch64_numa_cpu(const void *data) g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "node-id")); node = qdict_get_int(props, "node-id"); + g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "socket-id")); + socket = qdict_get_int(props, "socket-id"); + g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "cluster-id")); + cluster = qdict_get_int(props, "cluster-id"); + g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "core-id")); + core = qdict_get_int(props, "core-id"); g_assert(qdict_haskey(props, "thread-id")); thread = qdict_get_int(props, "thread-id"); - if (thread == 0) { + if (socket == 0 && cluster == 0 && core == 0 && thread == 0) { g_assert_cmpint(node, ==, 1); - } else if (thread == 1) { + } else if (socket == 1 && cluster == 0 && core == 0 && thread == 0) { g_assert_cmpint(node, ==, 0); } else { g_assert(false); -- cgit v1.1