From db08244a3a7ec312dfed3fd9b88e114281215458 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Rosato Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:16:07 -0400 Subject: s390x/s390-virtio-ccw: Reset PCI devices during subsystem reset Currently, a subsystem reset event leaves PCI devices enabled, causing issues post-reset in the guest (an example would be after a kexec). These devices need to be reset during a subsystem reset, allowing them to be properly re-enabled afterwards. Add the S390 PCI host bridge to the list of qdevs to be reset during subsystem reset. Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato Reviewed-by: Eric Farman Acked-by: Halil Pasic Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Message-Id: <1602767767-32713-1-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck --- hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c index e52182f..2e90033 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static const char *const reset_dev_types[] = { "s390-sclp-event-facility", "s390-flic", "diag288", + TYPE_S390_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE, }; static void subsystem_reset(void) -- cgit v1.1 From 3df4843d0e612a3c838e8d94c3e9c24520f2e680 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Janosch Frank Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:31:34 -0400 Subject: s390x: pv: Remove sclp boundary checks The SCLP boundary cross check is done by the Ultravisor for a protected guest, hence we don't need to do it. As QEMU doesn't get a valid SCCB address in protected mode this is even problematic and can lead to QEMU reporting a false boundary cross error. Fixes: db13387ca0 ("s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks") Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Tested-by: Marc Hartmayer Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Collin Walling Acked-by: Halil Pasic Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Message-Id: <20201022103135.126033-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck --- hw/s390x/sclp.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c index 00f1e46..0cf2290 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c @@ -285,11 +285,6 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, goto out_write; } - if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length), code)) { - work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION); - goto out_write; - } - sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code); out_write: s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb, -- cgit v1.1 From 3ded270a2697852a71961b45291519ae044f25e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Janosch Frank Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 06:31:35 -0400 Subject: s390x: pv: Fix diag318 PV fencing Diag318 fencing needs to be determined on the current VM PV state and not on the state that the VM has when we create the CPU model. Fixes: fabdada935 ("s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318") Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Tested-by: Marc Hartmayer Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger Reviewed-by: Collin Walling Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Message-Id: <20201022103135.126033-3-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck --- target/s390x/cpu_features.c | 5 +++++ target/s390x/cpu_features.h | 4 ++++ target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 4 ++++ target/s390x/kvm.c | 3 +-- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c index 31ea8df..42fe0bf 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include "qemu/osdep.h" #include "qemu/module.h" #include "cpu_features.h" +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h" #define DEF_FEAT(_FEAT, _NAME, _TYPE, _BIT, _DESC) \ [S390_FEAT_##_FEAT] = { \ @@ -105,6 +106,10 @@ void s390_fill_feat_block(const S390FeatBitmap features, S390FeatType type, } feat = find_next_bit(features, S390_FEAT_MAX, feat + 1); } + + if (type == S390_FEAT_TYPE_SCLP_FAC134 && s390_is_pv()) { + clear_be_bit(s390_feat_def(S390_FEAT_DIAG_318)->bit, data); + } } void s390_add_from_feat_block(S390FeatBitmap features, S390FeatType type, diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.h b/target/s390x/cpu_features.h index ef52ffc..87463f0 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.h +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.h @@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ const S390FeatGroupDef *s390_feat_group_def(S390FeatGroup group); #define BE_BIT_NR(BIT) (BIT ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) +static inline void clear_be_bit(unsigned int bit_nr, uint8_t *array) +{ + array[bit_nr / 8] &= ~(0x80 >> (bit_nr % 8)); +} static inline void set_be_bit(unsigned int bit_nr, uint8_t *array) { array[bit_nr / 8] |= 0x80 >> (bit_nr % 8); diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c index ca484bf..461e0b8 100644 --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include "hw/pci/pci.h" #endif #include "qapi/qapi-commands-machine-target.h" +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h" #define CPUDEF_INIT(_type, _gen, _ec_ga, _mha_pow, _hmfai, _name, _desc) \ { \ @@ -238,6 +239,9 @@ bool s390_has_feat(S390Feat feat) } return 0; } + if (feat == S390_FEAT_DIAG_318 && s390_is_pv()) { + return false; + } return test_bit(feat, cpu->model->features); } diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c index f13eff6..baa070f 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c @@ -2498,8 +2498,7 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, Error **errp) */ set_bit(S390_FEAT_EXTENDED_LENGTH_SCCB, model->features); - /* DIAGNOSE 0x318 is not supported under protected virtualization */ - if (!s390_is_pv() && kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318)) { + if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_S390_DIAG318)) { set_bit(S390_FEAT_DIAG_318, model->features); } -- cgit v1.1