From 83d5e19d3eedcf533d8be009a03c167b7e1ccf2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Huth Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:59:38 +0200 Subject: hw/arm/highbank: Silence warnings about missing fallthrough statements When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code, the fallthrough is very likely intended here, so add some comments to silence the compiler warnings. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Message-id: 20201020105938.23209-1-thuth@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell --- hw/arm/highbank.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/arm/highbank.c b/hw/arm/highbank.c index da0510d..f710878 100644 --- a/hw/arm/highbank.c +++ b/hw/arm/highbank.c @@ -92,10 +92,12 @@ static void hb_reset_secondary(ARMCPU *cpu, const struct arm_boot_info *info) address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x30, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL); + /* fallthrough */ case 3: address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x20, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL); + /* fallthrough */ case 2: address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory, SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x10, 0, -- cgit v1.1