aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/rtc-test.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-02-17qtest: Include system headers before user headersStefan Hajnoczi1-2/+3
It is dangerous to include user headers before system headers since user macros can affect system headers. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
2013-11-19qtest: Use -display none by defaultAndreas Färber1-1/+1
This avoids each test needing to add it to suppress windows popping up. [Commit 7ceeedd016facf8d58e14a0d1417fa7225d71072 ("blockdev-test: add test case for drive_add duplicate IDs") and commit 43cd209803d6cffb1e1a028c9ff2fd0ff4fce954 ("qdev-monitor-test: add device_add leak test cases") added qtest tests without specifying -display none. As a result, "make check" now tries to use graphics (GTK or SDL). Since graphics are not used by the test and inappropriate for headless "make check" runs, add the missing -display none. This fixes "make check" in the QEMU buildbot. -- Stefan] Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2013-04-08hw: move headers to include/Paolo Bonzini1-1/+1
Many of these should be cleaned up with proper qdev-/QOM-ification. Right now there are many catch-all headers in include/hw/ARCH depending on cpu.h, and this makes it necessary to compile these files per-target. However, fixing this does not belong in these patches. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2013-03-08rtc-test: Fix test failures with recent glibCole Robinson1-2/+2
As of glib 2.35.4, glib changed its logic for ordering test cases: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694487 This was causing failures in rtc-test. Group the reordered test cases into their own suite, which maintains the original ordering. CC: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2013-02-18rtc-test: add testcases for alarms in 12hour modePaolo Bonzini1-3/+199
Trying (unsuccessfully) to break the device model as mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1090558. At least if someone tries to fix that, it won't break what works... Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-id: 1357922817-17584-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
2013-02-18rtc-test: always set register B in its entiretyPaolo Bonzini1-27/+9
Eliminate dependencies between one test and the others. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-id: 1357922817-17584-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
2013-01-30tests: Fix {rtc, m48t59}-test build on illumosAndreas Färber1-0/+2
Struct tm does not have tm_gmtoff field on illumos. Fix the build by not zero-initializing these fields on Solaris. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@web.de> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2013-01-10rtc-test: skip year-2038 overflow check in case time_t is 32bit onlyGerd Hoffmann1-0/+4
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
2012-11-27rtc: Only call rtc_set_cmos when Register B SET flag is disabled.Alex Horn1-0/+40
This bug occurs when the SET flag of Register B is enabled. When an RTC data register (i.e. any of the ten time/calender CMOS bytes) is set, the data is (as expected) correctly stored in the cmos_data array. However, since the SET flag is enabled, the function rtc_set_time is not invoked. As a result, the field base_rtc in RTCState remains uninitialized. This causes a problem on subsequent writes which can end up overwriting data. To see this, consider writing data to Register A after having written data to any of the RTC data registers; the following figure illustrates the call stack for the Register A write operation: +- cmos_io_port_write +-- check_update_timer +---- get_next_alarm +------ rtc_update_time In rtc_update_time, get_guest_rtc calculates the wrong time and overwrites the previously written RTC data register values. Signed-off-by: Alex Horn <alex.horn@cs.ox.ac.uk> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
2012-10-05rtc: implement century bytePaolo Bonzini1-2/+30
Implement the century byte in the RTC emulation, and test that it works. This leads to some annoying compatibility code because we need to treat a value of 2000 for the base_year property as "use the century byte properly" (which would be a value of 0). The century byte will now be always-zero, rather than always-20, for the MIPS Magnum machine whose base_year is 1980. Commit 42fc73a (Support epoch of 1980 in RTC emulation for MIPS Magnum, 2009-01-24) correctly said: With an epoch of 1980 and a year of 2009, one could argue that [the century byte] should hold either 0, 1, 19 or 20. NT 3.50 on MIPS does not read the century byte. so I picked the simplest and most sensible implementation which is to return 0 for 1980-2079, 1 for 2080-2179 and so on. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
2012-10-05rtc: fix overflow in mktimegmPaolo Bonzini1-0/+45
When setting a date in 1980, Linux is actually disregarding the century byte and setting the year to 2080. This causes a year-2038 overflow in mktimegm. Fix this by doing the days-to-seconds computation in 64-bit math. Reported-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lookkas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
2012-04-19qtest: add register fuzzing to RTC testBlue Swirl1-0/+17
Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
2012-03-30qtest: avoid a warning with RTC testBlue Swirl1-3/+3
Avoid this warning on OpenBSD: CC tests/rtc-test.o /src/qemu/tests/rtc-test.c: In function 'check_time': /src/qemu/tests/rtc-test.c:171: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'time_t' /src/qemu/tests/rtc-test.c:173: warning: format '%ld' expects type 'long int', but argument 2 has type 'time_t' Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
2012-03-30qtest: add rtc-test test-caseAnthony Liguori1-0/+263
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>