aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/block
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-02-12virtio: Re-enable notifications after drainHanna Czenczek1-1/+6
During drain, we do not care about virtqueue notifications, which is why we remove the handlers on it. When removing those handlers, whether vq notifications are enabled or not depends on whether we were in polling mode or not; if not, they are enabled (by default); if so, they have been disabled by the io_poll_start callback. Because we do not care about those notifications after removing the handlers, this is fine. However, we have to explicitly ensure they are enabled when re-attaching the handlers, so we will resume receiving notifications. We do this in virtio_queue_aio_attach_host_notifier*(). If such a function is called while we are in a polling section, attaching the notifiers will then invoke the io_poll_start callback, re-disabling notifications. Because we will always miss virtqueue updates in the drained section, we also need to poll the virtqueue once after attaching the notifiers. Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-3934 Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20240202153158.788922-3-hreitz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 5bdbaebcce18fe6a627cafad2043ec08f3de5744) Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
2023-11-21block: Fix deadlocks in bdrv_graph_wrunlock()Kevin Wolf1-1/+14
bdrv_graph_wrunlock() calls aio_poll(), which may run callbacks that have a nested event loop. Nested event loops can depend on other iothreads making progress, so in order to allow them to make progress it must not hold the AioContext lock of another thread while calling aio_poll(). This introduces a @bs parameter to bdrv_graph_wrunlock() whose AioContext is temporarily dropped (which matches bdrv_graph_wrlock()), and a bdrv_graph_wrunlock_ctx() that can be used if the BlockDriverState doesn't necessarily exist any more when unlocking. This also requires a change to bdrv_schedule_unref(), which was relying on the incorrectly taken lock. It needs to take the lock itself now. While this is a separate bug, it can't be fixed a separate patch because otherwise the intermediate state would either deadlock or try to release a lock that we don't even hold. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231115172012.112727-3-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> [kwolf: Fixed up bdrv_schedule_unref()] Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-15include/block/ufs.h: spelling fix: settedMichael Tokarev1-1/+1
Fixes: bc4e68d362ec "hw/ufs: Initial commit for emulated Universal-Flash-Storage" Reviewed-by: Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
2023-11-08block: Protect bs->file with graph_lockKevin Wolf1-1/+1
Almost all functions that access bs->file already take the graph lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the struct field itself as protected by the graph lock. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-25-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-08block: Add missing GRAPH_RDLOCK annotationsKevin Wolf1-8/+9
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK to some driver callbacks that are already called with the graph lock held, and which will need the annotation because they access bs->file, but don't have it yet. This also covers a few callbacks that were not marked GRAPH_RDLOCK before, but where updating BlockDriver is trivially possible. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-21-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-08block: Introduce bdrv_co_change_backing_file()Kevin Wolf3-4/+12
bdrv_change_backing_file() is called both inside and outside coroutine context. This makes it difficult for it to take the graph lock internally. It also means that driver implementations need to be able to run outside of coroutines, too. Switch it to the usual model with a coroutine based implementation and a co_wrapper instead. The new function is marked GRAPH_RDLOCK. As the co_wrapper now runs the function in the AioContext of the node (as it should always have done), this is not GLOBAL_STATE_CODE() any more. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-20-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-08block: Protect bs->backing with graph_lockKevin Wolf1-1/+1
Almost all functions that access bs->backing already take the graph lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the struct field itself as protected by the graph lock. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-18-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_replace_node() GRAPH_WRLOCKKevin Wolf1-2/+4
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already hold it when calling bdrv_replace_node(). Its callers may already want to hold the graph lock and so wouldn't be able to call functions that take it internally. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-17-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_set_backing_hd_drained() GRAPH_WRLOCKKevin Wolf1-3/+4
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already hold it when calling bdrv_set_backing_hd_drained(). Basically everthing in the function needs the lock and its callers may already want to hold the graph lock and so wouldn't be able to call functions that take it internally. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-14-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_cow_child() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-2/+3
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_cow_child() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it accesses bs->backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-13-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_filter_child() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-2/+2
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_filter_child() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-12-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_chain_contains() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-1/+3
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_chain_contains() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_or_cow_bs(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-11-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_(un)freeze_backing_chain() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-5/+6
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_(un)freeze_backing_chain() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_or_cow_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Use the opportunity to make bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen() static, it has no external callers. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-10-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_skip_filters() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-5/+7
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_skip_filters() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-9-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_skip_implicit_filters() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-1/+2
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_skip_implicit_filters() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-8-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_filter_or_cow_bs() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-1/+2
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_filter_or_cow_bs() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_or_cow_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-7-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark block_job_add_bdrv() GRAPH_WRLOCKKevin Wolf2-6/+8
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already hold it when calling block_job_add_bdrv(). These callers will typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it internally. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-6-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_root_attach_child() GRAPH_WRLOCKKevin Wolf1-6/+7
Instead of taking the writer lock internally, require callers to already hold it when calling bdrv_root_attach_child(). These callers will typically already hold the graph lock once the locking work is completed, which means that they can't call functions that take it internally. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-5-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_filter_bs() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-2/+3
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_filter_bs() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_child(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-4-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_has_zero_init() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-2/+2
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_has_zero_init() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_bs(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-3-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-11-07block: Mark bdrv_probe_blocksizes() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-2/+3
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_probe_blocksizes() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_filter_bs(), which accesses bs->file/backing. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20231027155333.420094-2-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-31blockjob: query driver-specific info via a new 'query' driver methodFiona Ebner1-0/+5
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Message-ID: <20231031135431.393137-9-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-31blockjob: introduce block-job-change QMP commandFiona Ebner2-0/+18
which will allow changing job-type-specific options after job creation. In the JobVerbTable, the same allow bits as for set-speed are used, because set-speed can be considered an existing change command. Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Message-ID: <20231031135431.393137-2-f.ebner@proxmox.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-30hw/ufs: Modify lu.c to share codes with SCSI subsystemJeuk Kim1-1/+1
This patch removes the code that ufs-lu was duplicating from scsi-hd and allows them to share code. It makes ufs-lu have a virtual scsi-bus and scsi-hd internally. This allows scsi related commands to be passed thorugh to the scsi-hd. The query request and nop command work the same as the existing logic. Well-known lus do not have a virtual scsi-bus and scsi-hd, and handle the necessary scsi commands by emulating them directly. Signed-off-by: Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com>
2023-10-16Merge tag 'pull-ufs-20231013' of https://gitlab.com/jeuk20.kim/qemu into stagingStefan Hajnoczi1-2/+2
hw/ufs: fixes # -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- # # iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEUBfYMVl8eKPZB+73EuIgTA5dtgIFAmUozswACgkQEuIgTA5d # tgITExAAo0BSNir4I5MfeNIjZTNNdxLXDl0+92JyairB2m/gWH/02jGtrJBYp5On # ELnixKj2Ntn9IIRr3NwQHNTnDOZHRkUBH+pRVeMbZ+IWLjEoWQdl03ge7e9sHai3 # CLXB4HPSnXddy1SmS9FEkdBWopqxKF4BLZnpAfwh/dj2fzSyDyNIMmGoRimRQhph # 9A90304ERUdpREAXncTgSdXeDZz+lScadzUJZrPPiG2ZHXL+qzDCX7ojEnNaUFxz # W1IfriI8oeeORfCQaNEOncLKhSwE1WscGxP0vILPApKOu251tObgSbK90QlQR2qT # BMl7k4BDfYeksXMGc0BXVFrOfv1ud86NlCE2OokK6HBZVuHio4C6TU/t65MC4Rw5 # mJ8CPgbN+7sgVmAGo0sLYzI6GiRR27VqqLh6KXVAa5c/fAdt5pHSkakwSvxiXsAl # EqskmOY2em5O//+7CWN1CtY+I2pHyltMXAi3Cb2vjweNx88kuhmxFQWeZVI10/H3 # gNrNfu32+ihDLMqR7uQamdAZV0lnIwp97nCbf3LzpM0btjl70QvGZhsbiCDiLQrG # mJjnaix4xDb8T21WKrI8DKcwR4rvD8hZsCUp31XJnA8HWtdPnEQldK8NEGNlU5ye # lrGc6gxiwZLCBBIj9lwbZW3Zv9Vz9jNWISOmY+KWLCIus98DBxQ= # =XXsQ # -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- # gpg: Signature made Fri 13 Oct 2023 00:59:56 EDT # gpg: using RSA key 5017D831597C78A3D907EEF712E2204C0E5DB602 # gpg: Good signature from "Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com>" [unknown] # gpg: aka "Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@gmail.com>" [unknown] # gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! # gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. # Primary key fingerprint: 5017 D831 597C 78A3 D907 EEF7 12E2 204C 0E5D B602 * tag 'pull-ufs-20231013' of https://gitlab.com/jeuk20.kim/qemu: hw/ufs: Fix incorrect register fields hw/ufs: Fix code coverity issues Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2023-10-13hw/ufs: Fix incorrect register fieldsJeuk Kim1-2/+2
This patch fixes invalid ufs register fields. This fixes an issue reported by Bin Meng that caused ufs to fail over riscv. Fixes: bc4e68d362ec ("hw/ufs: Initial commit for emulated Universal-Flash-Storage") Signed-off-by: Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@samsung.com> Reported-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
2023-10-12block: Add assertion for bdrv_graph_wrlock()Kevin Wolf1-1/+2
bdrv_graph_wrlock() can't run in a coroutine (because it polls) and requires holding the BQL. We already have GLOBAL_STATE_CODE() to assert the latter. Assert the former as well and add a no_coroutine_fn marker. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-23-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Protect bs->children with graph_lockKevin Wolf1-2/+2
Almost all functions that access the child links already take the graph lock now. Add locking to the remaining users and finally annotate the struct field itself as protected by the graph lock. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-22-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Protect bs->parents with graph_lockKevin Wolf1-2/+2
Almost all functions that access the parent link already take the graph lock now. Add locking to the remaining user in a test case and finally annotate the struct field itself as protected by the graph lock. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-21-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_get_specific_info() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-4/+5
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_get_specific_info() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. This removes an assume_graph_lock() call in vmdk's implementation. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-20-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_apply_auto_read_only() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-2/+4
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_apply_auto_read_only() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_can_set_read_only(), which indirectly accesses the parents list of a node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-19-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_op_is_blocked() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-1/+3
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_op_is_blocked() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_get_device_or_node_name(), which accesses the parents list of a node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-18-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12qcow2: Mark qcow2_signal_corruption() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-2/+2
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of qcow2_signal_corruption() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it calls bdrv_get_node_name(), which accesses the parents list of a node. For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock() with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is properly annotated. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-15-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_amend_options() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-10/+8
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_amend_options() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. This removes an assume_graph_lock() call in crypto's implementation. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-14-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_get_parent_name() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf3-6/+11
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_get_parent_name() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it accesses the parents list of a node. For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock() with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is properly annotated. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-13-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_primary_child() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-2/+3
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_primary_child() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it accesses the children list of a node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-12-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_refresh_filename() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf3-16/+17
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_refresh_filename() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it accesses the children list of a node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-11-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_get_xdbg_block_graph() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-1/+1
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_get_xdbg_block_graph() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it accesses the children list of a node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-10-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Take graph rdlock in parts of reopenKevin Wolf1-5/+8
Reopen isn't easy with respect to locking because many of its functions need to iterate the graph, some change it, and then you get some drains in the middle where you can't hold any locks. Therefore just documents most of the functions to be unlocked, and take locks internally before accessing the graph. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-9-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_snapshot_fallback() and callers GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf2-18/+24
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_snapshot_fallback() need to hold a reader lock for the graph because it accesses the children list of a node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-8-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark drain related functions GRAPH_RDLOCKEmanuele Giuseppe Esposito2-8/+21
Draining recursively traverses the graph, therefore we need to make sure that also such accesses to the graph are protected by the graph rdlock. There are 3 different drain callers to consider: 1. drain in the main loop: no issue at all, rdlock is nop. 2. drain in an iothread: rdlock only works in main loop or coroutines, so disallow it. 3. drain in a coroutine (regardless of AioContext): the drain mechanism takes care of scheduling a BH in the bs->aio_context that will then take care of perform the actual draining. This is wrong, because as pointed in (2) if bs->aio_context is an iothread then rdlock won't work. Therefore change bdrv_co_yield_to_drain to schedule the BH in the main loop. Caller (2) also implies that we need to modify test-bdrv-drain.c to disallow draining in the iothreads. For some places, we know that they will hold the lock, but we don't have the GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations yet. In this case, add assume_graph_lock() with a FIXME comment. These places will be removed once everything is properly annotated. Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-6-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: Mark bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() GRAPH_RDLOCKKevin Wolf1-4/+5
This adds GRAPH_RDLOCK annotations to declare that callers of bdrv_first_blk() and bdrv_is_root_node() need to hold a reader lock for the graph. These functions are the only functions in block-backend.c that access the parent list of a node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-5-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block-coroutine-wrapper: Add no_co_wrapper_bdrv_rdlock functionsKevin Wolf1-2/+5
Add a new wrapper type for GRAPH_RDLOCK functions that should be called from coroutine context. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230929145157.45443-3-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: switch to co_wrapper for bdrv_is_allocated_*Paolo Bonzini1-5/+7
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-4-pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-12block: complete public block status APIPaolo Bonzini1-6/+11
Include both coroutine and non-coroutine versions, the latter being co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock of the former. Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230904100306.156197-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
2023-10-05nbd/server: Prepare for per-request filtering of BLOCK_STATUSEric Blake1-0/+1
The next commit will add support for the optional extension NBD_CMD_FLAG_PAYLOAD during NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, where the client can request that the server only return a subset of negotiated contexts, rather than all contexts. To make that task easier, this patch populates the list of contexts to return on a per-command basis (for now, identical to the full set of negotiated contexts). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230925192229.3186470-25-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
2023-10-05nbd/server: Refactor list of negotiated meta contextsEric Blake1-0/+1
Peform several minor refactorings of how the list of negotiated meta contexts is managed, to make upcoming patches easier: Promote the internal type NBDExportMetaContexts to the public opaque type NBDMetaContexts, and mark exp const. Use a shorter member name in NBDClient. Hoist calls to nbd_check_meta_context() earlier in their callers, as the number of negotiated contexts may impact the flags exposed in regards to an export, which in turn requires a new parameter. Drop a redundant parameter to nbd_negotiate_meta_queries. No semantic change intended on the success path; on the failure path, dropping context in nbd_check_meta_export even when reporting an error is safer. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Message-ID: <20230925192229.3186470-24-eblake@redhat.com>
2023-10-05nbd/client: Initial support for extended headersEric Blake1-1/+2
Update the client code to be able to send an extended request, and parse an extended header from the server. Note that since we reject any structured reply with a too-large payload, we can always normalize a valid header back into the compact form, so that the caller need not deal with two branches of a union. Still, until a later patch lets the client negotiate extended headers, the code added here should not be reached. Note that because of the different magic numbers, it is just as easy to trace and then tolerate a non-compliant server sending the wrong header reply as it would be to insist that the server is compliant. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230925192229.3186470-21-eblake@redhat.com> [eblake: fix trace format] Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
2023-09-25nbd: Prepare for 64-bit request effect lengthsEric Blake1-2/+2
Widen the length field of NBDRequest to 64-bits, although we can assert that all current uses are still under 32 bits: either because of NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE which is even smaller (and where size_t can still be appropriate, even on 32-bit platforms), or because nothing ever puts us into NBD_MODE_EXTENDED yet (and while future patches will allow larger transactions, the lengths in play here are still capped at 32-bit). There are no semantic changes, other than a typo fix in a couple of error messages. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20230829175826.377251-23-eblake@redhat.com> [eblake: fix assertion bug in nbd_co_send_simple_reply] Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
2023-09-22nbd: Add types for extended headersEric Blake1-36/+88
Add the constants and structs necessary for later patches to start implementing the NBD_OPT_EXTENDED_HEADERS extension in both the client and server, matching recent upstream nbd.git (through commit e6f3b94a934). This patch does not change any existing behavior, but merely sets the stage for upcoming patches. This patch does not change the status quo that neither the client nor server use a packed-struct representation for the request header. While most of the patch adds new types, there is also some churn for renaming the existing NBDExtent to NBDExtent32 to contrast it with NBDExtent64, which I thought was a nicer name than NBDExtentExt. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Message-ID: <20230829175826.377251-22-eblake@redhat.com>
generated by cgit v1.1 at 2025-03-14 20:00:03 +0000