aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/pci-host
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-03-21Use g_new() & friends where that makes obvious senseMarkus Armbruster2-2/+2
g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n). It's also safer, for two reasons. One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t. Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch more type errors. This commit only touches allocations with size arguments of the form sizeof(T). Patch created mechanically with: $ spatch --in-place --sp-file scripts/coccinelle/use-g_new-etc.cocci \ --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h FILES... Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20220315144156.1595462-4-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <Pavel.Dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>
2022-03-14ppc/pnv: Remove user-created PHB{3,4,5} devicesCédric Le Goater3-93/+9
On a real system with POWER{8,9,10} processors, PHBs are sub-units of the processor, they can be deactivated by firmware but not plugged in or out like a PCI adapter on a slot. Nevertheless, having user-created PHBs in QEMU seemed to be a good idea for testing purposes : 1. having a limited set of PHBs speedups boot time. 2. it is useful to be able to mimic a partially broken topology you some time have to deal with during bring-up. PowerNV is also used for distro install tests and having libvirt support eases these tasks. libvirt prefers to run the machine with -nodefaults to be sure not to drag unexpected devices which would need to be defined in the domain file without being specified on the QEMU command line. For this reason : 3. -nodefaults should not include default PHBs User-created PHB{3,4,5} devices satisfied all these needs but reality proves to be a bit more complex, internally when modeling such devices, and externally when dealing with the user interface. Req 1. and 2. can be simply addressed differently with a machine option: "phb-mask=<uint>", which QEMU would use to enable/disable PHB device nodes when creating the device tree. For Req 3., we need to make sure we are taking the right approach. It seems that we should expose a new type of user-created PHB device, a generic virtualized one, that libvirt would use and not one depending on the processor revision. This needs more thinking. For now, remove user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices. All the cleanups we did are not lost and they will be useful for the next steps. Fixes: 5bc67b052b51 ("ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devices") Fixes: 1f6a88fffc75 ("ppc/pnv: Introduce support for user created PHB3 devices") Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220314130514.529931-1-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-14ppc/pnv: Introduce a pnv-phb5 device to match root portFrederic Barrat2-4/+12
We already have the pnv-phb3 and pnv-phb4 devices for POWER8 and POWER9 respectively. POWER10 uses version 5 of the PHB. It is very close to the PHB4 from POWER9, at least in our model and we could almost keep using the PHB4 model. However the matching root port pnv-phb5-root-port is specific to POWER10 so to avoid confusion as well as making it easy to introduce differences later, we create a pnv-phb5 class, which is mostly an alias for pnv-phb4 for now. With this patch, the command line for a user-created PHB on powernv10 becomes: -machine powernv10 -nodefaults -device pnv-phb5 -device pnv-phb5-root-port Fixes: 623575e16cd5 ("ppc/pnv: Add model for POWER10 PHB5 PCIe Host bridge") Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220310155101.294568-2-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: Add support for PHB5 "Address-based trigger" modeCédric Le Goater2-6/+69
When the Address-Based Interrupt Trigger mode is activated, the PHB maps the interrupt source number into the interrupt command address. The PHB directly triggers the IC ESB page of the interrupt number and not the notify page of the IC anymore. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: Add support for PQ offload on PHB5Cédric Le Goater1-0/+9
The PQ_disable configuration bit disables the check done on the PQ state bits when processing new MSI interrupts. When bit 9 is enabled, the PHB forwards any MSI trigger to the XIVE interrupt controller without checking the PQ state bits. The XIVE IC knows from the trigger message that the PQ bits have not been checked and performs the check locally. This configuration bit only applies to MSIs and LSIs are still checked on the PHB to handle the assertion level. PQ_disable enablement is a requirement for StoreEOI. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/xive: Add support for PQ state bits offloadCédric Le Goater1-2/+7
The trigger message coming from a HW source contains a special bit informing the XIVE interrupt controller that the PQ bits have been checked at the source or not. Depending on the value, the IC can perform the check and the state transition locally using its own PQ state bits. The following changes add new accessors to the XiveRouter required to query and update the PQ state bits. This only applies to the PowerNV machine. sPAPR accessors are provided but the pSeries machine should not be concerned by such complex configuration for the moment. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: Add model for POWER10 PHB5 PCIe Host bridgeCédric Le Goater2-0/+73
PHB4 and PHB5 are very similar. Use the PHB4 models with some minor adjustements in a subclass for P10. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-03-02ppc/pnv: fix default PHB4 QOM hierarchyDaniel Henrique Barboza1-20/+16
Commit 3f4c369ea63e ("ppc/pnv: make PECs create and realize PHB4s") changed phb4_pec code to create the default PHB4 objects in pnv_pec_default_phb_realize(). In this process the stacks[] PEC array was removed and each PHB4 object is tied together with its PEC via the phb->pec pointer. This change also broke the previous QOM hierarchy - the PHB4 objects are being created and not being parented to their respective chips. This can be verified by 'info pic' in a powernv9 domain with default settings. pnv_chip_power9_pic_print_info() will fail to find the PHBs because object_child_foreach_recursive() won't find any. The solution is to set the parent chip and the parent bus, in the same way done for user created PHB4 devices, for all PHB4 devices. Fixes: 3f4c369ea63e ("ppc/pnv: make PECs create and realize PHB4s") Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220218202804.413157-1-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-28ppc/pnv: use a do-while() loop in pnv_phb4_translate_tve()Daniel Henrique Barboza1-2/+4
pnv_phb4_translate_tve() is quite similar to pnv_phb3_translate_tve(), and that includes the fact that 'taddr' can be considered uninitialized when throwing the "TCE access fault" error because, in theory, the loop that sets 'taddr' can be skippable due to 'lev' being an signed int. No one complained about this specific case yet, but since we took the time to handle the same situtation in pnv_phb3_translate_tve(), let's replicate it here as well. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Message-Id: <20220127122234.842145-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-28ppc/pnv: use a do-while() loop in pnv_phb3_translate_tve()Daniel Henrique Barboza1-2/+4
The 'taddr' variable is left unintialized, being set only inside the "while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop where we get the TCE address. The 'lev' var is an int32_t that is being initiliazed by the GETFIELD() macro, which returns an uint64_t. For a human reader this means that 'lev' will always be positive or zero. But some compilers may beg to differ. 'lev' being an int32_t can in theory be set as negative, and the "while ((lev--) >= 0)" loop might never be reached, and 'taddr' will be left unitialized. This can cause phb3_error() to use 'taddr' uninitialized down below: if ((is_write & !(tce & 2)) || ((!is_write) && !(tce & 1))) { phb3_error(phb, "TCE access fault at 0x%"PRIx64, taddr); A quick way of fixing it is to use a do/while() loop. This will keep the same semanting as the existing while() loop does and the compiler will understand that 'taddr' will be initialized at least once. Suggested-by: Matheus K. Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/573 Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220127122234.842145-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-28ppc/pnv: Fail DMA access if page permissions are not correctFrederic Barrat2-10/+12
If an iommu page has wrong permissions, an error message is displayed, but the access is allowed, which is odd. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220121152350.381685-1-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: Remove PHB4 version propertyCédric Le Goater2-11/+1
Grab the PHB version from the PEC class directly when needed. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-4-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: Add a 'rp_model' class attribute for the PHB4 PECCédric Le Goater1-1/+4
PHB5 will introduce its own root port model. Prepare ground for it. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-3-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: Move root port allocation under pnv_pec_default_phb_realize()Cédric Le Goater2-7/+3
The root port device is currently created and attached to the PHB early in pnv_phb4_realize(). Do it under pnv_pec_default_phb_realize() after the PHB is fully realized. It's cleaner and avoids an extra test on defaults_enabled(). Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220117122753.1655504-2-clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: rename pnv_pec_stk_update_map()Daniel Henrique Barboza1-2/+2
This function does not use 'stack' anymore. Rename it to pnv_pec_phb_update_map(). Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-9-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: remove PnvPhb4PecStack objectDaniel Henrique Barboza1-33/+0
All the complexity that was scattered between PnvPhb4PecStack and PnvPHB4 are now centered in the PnvPHB4 device. PnvPhb4PecStack does not serve any purpose in the current code base. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-8-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: make PECs create and realize PHB4sDaniel Henrique Barboza2-64/+28
This patch changes the design of the PEC device to create and realize PHB4s instead of PecStacks. After all the recent changes, PHB4s now contain all the information needed for their proper functioning, not relying on PecStack in any capacity. All changes are being made in a single patch to avoid renaming parts of the PecState and leaving the code in a strange way. E.g. rename PecClass->num_stacks to num_phbs, which would then read a pnv_pec_num_stacks[] array. To avoid mixing the old and new design more than necessary it's clearer to do these changes in a single step. The name changes made are: - in PnvPhb4PecState: * rename 'num_stacks' to 'num_phbs' * remove the pec->stacks[] array. Current code relies on the pec->stacks[] obj acting as a simple container, without ever accessing pec->stacks[] for any other purpose. Instead of converting this into a pec->phbs[] array, remove it - in PnvPhb4PecClass, rename *num_stacks to *num_phbs; - pnv_pec_num_stacks[] is renamed to pnv_pec_num_phbs[]. The logical changes: - pnv_pec_default_phb_realize(): * init and set the properties of the PnvPHB4 qdev * do not use stack->phb anymore; - pnv_pec_realize(): * use the new default_phb_realize() to init/realize each PHB if running with defaults; - pnv_pec_instance_init(): removed since we're creating the PHBs during pec_realize(); - pnv_phb4_get_stack(): * renamed to pnv_phb4_get_pec() and returns a PnvPhb4PecState*; - pnv_phb4_realize(): use 'phb->pec' instead of 'stack'. This design change shouldn't caused any behavioral change in the runtime of the machine. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-7-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: remove PnvPhb4PecStack::stack_noDaniel Henrique Barboza1-2/+0
pnv_pec_default_phb_realize() stopped using it after the previous patch and no one else is using it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move default_phb_realize() to pec_realize()Daniel Henrique Barboza1-30/+33
Move the current pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize() call to pec_realize(), renaming the function to pnv_pec_default_phb_realize(), and set the PHB attributes using the PEC object directly. This will be important to allow for PECs devices to handle PHB4s directly later on. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-5-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: remove stack pointer from PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza2-13/+4
This pointer was being used for two reasons: pnv_phb4_update_regions() was using it to access the PHB and phb4_realize() was using it as a way to determine if the PHB was user created. We can determine if the PHB is user created via phb->pec, introduced in the previous patch, and pnv_phb4_update_regions() is no longer using stack->phb. Remove the pointer from the PnvPHB4 device. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: reduce stack->stack_no usageDaniel Henrique Barboza1-12/+34
'stack->stack_no' represents the order that a stack appears in its PEC. Its primary use is in XSCOM address space calculation in pnv_phb4_xscom_realize() when calculating the memory region offset. This attribute is redundant with phb->phb_id, which is calculated via pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id() using stack->stack_no information. It'll also be awkward to assign it when dealing with PECs and PHBs only in a future patch. A new pnv_phb4_get_phb_stack_no() helper is introduced to eliminate most of the stack->stack_no uses we have. The only use left after this patch is during pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize() when calculating phb_id, which will also handled in the next patches. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: introduce PnvPHB4 'pec' propertyDaniel Henrique Barboza2-6/+15
This property will track the owner PEC of this PHB. For now it's redundant since we can retrieve the PEC via phb->stack->pec but it will not be redundant when we get rid of the stack device. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220114180719.52117-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move phb_regs_mr to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-3/+3
After recent changes, this MemoryRegion can be migrated to PnvPHB4 without too much trouble. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-11-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move nest_regs_mr to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-9/+7
We're now able to cleanly move nest_regs_mr to the PnvPHB4 device. One thing of notice here is the need to use a phb->stack->pec pointer because pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write requires a PEC object. Another thing that can be noticed in the use of 'stack->stack_no' that still remains throughout the XSCOM code. After moving all MemoryRegions to the PnvPHB4 object, this illustrates what is the remaining role of the stack: provide a PEC pointer and the 'stack_no' information. If we can provide these in the PnvPHB4 object instead (spoiler: we can, and we will), the PnvPhb4PecStack device will be deprecated and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-10-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: change pnv_pec_stk_update_map() to use PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-3/+3
stack->nest_regs_mr wasn't migrated to PnvPHB4 together with phb->nest_regs[] in the previous patch. We were unable to cleanly convert its write MemoryRegionOps, pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write(), to use PnvPHB4 instead of PnvPhb4PecStack due to pnv_pec_stk_update_map() using a stack. Thing is, we're now able to convert pnv_pec_stk_update_map() because of what the did in previous patch. The need for this intermediate step is a good example of the interconnected relationship between stack and phb that we aim to cleanup. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-9-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move nest_regs[] to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-25/+27
stack->nest_regs[] is used in several XSCOM functions and it's one of the main culprits of having to deal with stack->phb pointers around the code. Sure, we're having to add 2 extra stack->phb pointers to ease nest_regs[] migration to PnvPHB4. They'll be dealt with shortly. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-8-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move mmbar0/mmbar1 and friends to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-26/+26
These 2 MemoryRegions, together with mmio(0|1)_base and mmio(0|1)_size variables, are used together in the same functions. We're better of moving them all in a single step. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-7-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: change pnv_phb4_update_regions() to use PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-5/+3
The function does not rely on stack for anything it does anymore. This is also one less instance of 'stack->phb' that we need to worry about. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move intbar to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-9/+9
This MemoryRegion can also be moved in a single step. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-5-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move phbbar to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-9/+10
This MemoryRegion is simple enough to be moved in a single step. A 'stack->phb' pointer had to be introduced in pnv_pec_stk_update_map() because this function isn't ready to be fully converted to use a PnvPHB4 pointer instead. This will be dealt with in the following patches. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: move PCI registers to PnvPHB4Daniel Henrique Barboza1-15/+15
Previous patch changed pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read() and pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write() to use a PnvPHB4 opaque, making it easier to move both pci_regs[] and the pci_regs_mr MemoryRegion to the PnvHB4 object. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-18ppc/pnv: use PHB4 obj in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_opsDaniel Henrique Barboza1-5/+5
The current relationship between PnvPhb4PecStack and PnvPHB4 objects is overly complex. Recent work done in pnv_phb4.c and pnv_phb4_pec.c shows that the stack obj role in the overall design is more of a placeholder for its 'phb' object, having no atributes that stand on its own. This became clearer after pnv-phb4 user creatable devices were implemented. What remains now are a lot of stack->phb and phb->stack pointers throughout .read and .write callbacks of MemoryRegionOps that are being initialized in phb4_realize() time. stk_realize() is a no-op if the machine is being run with -nodefaults. The first step of trying to decouple the stack and phb relationship is to move the MemoryRegionOps that belongs to PnvPhb4PecStack to PhbPHB4. Unfortunately this can't be done without some preliminary steps to change the usage of 'stack' and replace it with 'phb' in these read/write callbacks. This patch starts this process by using a PnvPHB4 opaque in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_ops instead of PnvPhb4PecStack. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220113192952.911188-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: use stack->pci_regs[] in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write()Daniel Henrique Barboza1-10/+10
pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write() is pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_ops write callback. It writes values into regs in the stack->nest_regs[] array. The pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read read callback, on the other hand, returns values of the stack->pci_regs[]. In fact, at this moment, the only use of stack->pci_regs[] is in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_read(). There's no code that is written anything in stack->pci_regs[], which is suspicious. Considering that stack->nest_regs[] is widely used by the nested MemoryOps pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_ops, in both read and write callbacks, the conclusion is that we're writing the wrong array in pnv_pec_stk_pci_xscom_write(). This function should write stack->pci_regs[] instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20220111200132.633896-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: turn pnv_phb4_update_regions() into staticDaniel Henrique Barboza1-26/+26
Its only callers are inside pnv_phb4.c. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: Introduce user creatable pnv-phb4 devicesDaniel Henrique Barboza2-4/+87
This patch introduces pnv-phb4 user creatable devices that are created in a similar manner as pnv-phb3 devices, allowing the user to interact with the PHBs directly instead of creating PCI Express Controllers that will create a certain amount of PHBs per controller index. We accomplish this by doing the following: - add a pnv_phb4_get_stack() helper to retrieve which stack an user created phb4 would occupy; - when dealing with an user created pnv-phb4 (detected by checking if phb->stack is NULL at the start of phb4_realize()), retrieve its stack and initialize its properties as done in stk_realize(); - use 'defaults_enabled()' in stk_realize() to avoid creating and initializing a 'stack->phb' qdev that might be overwritten by an user created pnv-phb4 device. This process is wrapped into a new helper called pnv_pec_stk_default_phb_realize(). Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-5-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: turn 'phb' into a pointer in struct PnvPhb4PecStackDaniel Henrique Barboza2-14/+8
At this moment, stack->phb is the plain PnvPHB4 device itself instead of a pointer to the device. This will present a problem when adding user creatable devices because we can't deal with this struct and the realize() callback from the user creatable device. We can't get rid of this attribute, similar to what we did when enabling pnv-phb3 user creatable devices, because pnv_phb4_update_regions() needs to access stack->phb to do its job. This function is called twice in pnv_pec_stk_update_map(), which is one of the nested xscom write callbacks (via pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write()). In fact, pnv_pec_stk_update_map() code comment is explicit about how the order of the unmap/map operations relates with the PHB subregions. All of this indicates that this code is tied together in a way that we either go on a crusade, featuring lots of refactories and redesign and considerable pain, to decouple stack and phb mapping, or we allow stack update_map operations to access the associated PHB as it is today even after introducing pnv-phb4 user devices. This patch chooses the latter. Instead of getting rid of stack->phb, turn it into a PHB pointer. This will allow us to assign an user created PHB to an existing stack later. In this process, pnv_pec_stk_instance_init() is removed because stack->phb is being initialized in stk_realize() instead. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: move PHB4 XSCOM init to phb4_realize()Daniel Henrique Barboza2-292/+304
The 'stack->phb_regs_mr' PHB4 passthrough XSCOM initialization relies on 'stack->phb' being not NULL. Moving 'stack->phb_regs_mr' region_init() and add_subregion() to phb4_realize() time is a natural thing to do since it's strictly PHB related. The remaining XSCOM initialization is also related to 'stack->phb' but in a different manner. For instance, 'stack->nest_regs_mr' MemoryRegionOps, 'pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_ops', uses pnv_pec_stk_nest_xscom_write() as a write callback. When trying to write the PEC_NEST_STK_BAR_EN reg, pnv_pec_stk_update_map() is called. Inside this function, pnv_phb4_update_regions() is called twice. This function uses 'stack->phb' to manipulate memory regions of the phb. This is not a problem now but, when enabling user creatable phb4s, a stack that doesn't have an associated phb (i.e. stack->phb = NULL) it will cause a SIGINT during boot in pnv_phb4_update_regions(). All this can be avoided if all XSCOM realize is moved to phb4_realize(), when we have certainty about the existence of 'stack->phb'. A lot of code was moved from pnv_phb4_pec.c to pnv_phb4.c due to static constant and variables being used but the cleaner logic is worth the trouble. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: set phb4 properties in stk_realize()Daniel Henrique Barboza1-3/+3
Moving all phb4 properties setup to stk_realize() keeps this logic in a single place instead of having it scattered between stk_realize() and pec_realize(). 'phb->index' can be retrieved using stack->stack_no and pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id(), deprecating the use of 'phb-id' alias that was being used for this purpose in pec_realize(). Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220111131027.599784-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12pnv_phb4_pec: use pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id() in pnv_pec_dt_xscom()Daniel Henrique Barboza1-3/+2
Relying on stack->phb to write the xscom DT of the PEC is something that we won't be able to do with user creatable pnv-phb4 devices. Hopefully, this can be done by using pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id(), which is already used by pnv_pec_realize() to set the phb-id of the stack. Use the same idea in pnv_pec_dt_xscom() to write ibm,phb-index without the need to accessing stack->phb, since stack->phb is not granted to be != NULL when user creatable phbs are introduced. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220110143346.455901-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12pnv_phb4_pec.c: move pnv_pec_phb_offset() to pnv_phb4.cDaniel Henrique Barboza2-14/+18
The logic inside pnv_pec_phb_offset() will be useful in the next patch to determine the stack that should contain a PHB4 device. Move the function to pnv_phb4.c and make it public since there's no pnv_phb4_pec.h header. While we're at it, add 'stack_index' as a parameter and make the function return 'phb-id' directly. And rename it to pnv_phb4_pec_get_phb_id() to be even clearer about the function intent. Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220110143346.455901-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: Complete user created PHB3 devicesCédric Le Goater1-0/+9
PHB3s ared SysBus devices and should be allowed to be dynamically created. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-9-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: Reparent user created PHB3 devices to the PnvChipCédric Le Goater1-0/+6
The powernv machine uses the object hierarchy to populate the device tree and each device should be parented to the chip it belongs to. This is not the case for user created devices which are parented to the container "/unattached". Make sure a PHB3 device is parented to its chip by reparenting the object if necessary. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-8-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: Introduce support for user created PHB3 devicesCédric Le Goater1-1/+10
PHB3 devices and PCI devices can now be added to the powernv8 machine using : -device pnv-phb3,chip-id=0,index=1 \ -device nec-usb-xhci,bus=pci.1,addr=0x0 The 'index' property identifies the PHB3 in the chip. In case of user created devices, a lookup on 'chip-id' is required to assign the owning chip. Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-7-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12pnv_phb4.c: check if root port exists in rc_config functionsDaniel Henrique Barboza1-2/+8
pnv_phb4_rc_config_read() and pnv_phb4_rc_config_write() are asserting the existence of the root port. The root port is now optional, and there will be cases where a pnv-phb4 device won't have a root port attached. Instead of asserting, check if the root port exists before read/writing into it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12pnv_phb4.c: make pnv-phb4-root-port user creatableDaniel Henrique Barboza1-11/+7
We want to create only the absolutely minimal amount of devices when running with -nodefaults. The root port is something that the machine can boot up without. But, to do that, we need to provide a way for the user to add them by hand. This patch makes pnv-phb4-root-port user creatable and then uses the pnv_phb_attach_root_port() helper to add a pnv_phb4_root_port only when running with default settings. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-5-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12ppc/pnv: Attach PHB3 root port device when defaults are enabledCédric Le Goater1-9/+6
This cleanups the PHB3 model a bit more since the root port is an independent device and it will ease our task when adding user created PHB3s. pnv_phb_attach_root_port() is made public in pnv.c so it can be reused with the pnv_phb4 root port later. Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12pnv_phb4.c: add unique chassis and slot for pnv_phb4_root_portDaniel Henrique Barboza1-0/+15
A similar situation as described previously with pnv_phb3_root_port devices also happens with pnv_phb4_root_ports. The solution is the same: assign an unique chassis/slot combo for them. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-12pnv_phb3.c: add unique chassis and slot for pnv_phb3_root_portDaniel Henrique Barboza1-0/+16
When creating a pnv_phb3_root_port using the command line, the first root port is created successfully, but the second fails with the following error: qemu-system-ppc64: -device pnv-phb3-root-port,bus=phb3-root.0,id=pcie.3: Can't add chassis slot, error -16 This error comes from the realize() function of its parent type, rp_realize() from TYPE_PCIE_ROOT_PORT. pcie_chassis_add_slot() fails with -EBUSY if there's an existing PCIESlot that has the same chassis/slot value, regardless of being in a different bus. One way to prevent this error is simply set chassis and slot values in the command line. However, since phb3 root buses only supports a single root port, we can just get an unique chassis/slot value by checking which root bus the pnv_phb3_root_port is going to be attached, get the equivalent phb3 device and use its chip-id and index values, which are guaranteed to be unique. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20220105212338.49899-2-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-04pnv_phb4.c: do not set 'root-bus' as bus nameDaniel Henrique Barboza1-1/+1
This change has the same motivation as the one done for pnv-phb3-root-bus buses previously. Defaulting every bus to 'root-bus' makes it impossible to attach root ports to specific buses and it doesn't allow for custom bus naming because we're ignoring the 'id' value when registering the root bus. After this patch, creating pnv-phb4 devices with 'id' being set will result in the following qtree: qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv9,accel=tcg \ -device pnv-phb4,chip-id=0,index=0,id=pcie.0 \ -device pnv-phb4,chip-id=1,index=4,id=pcie.1 bus: main-system-bus type System dev: pnv-phb4, id "pcie.1" index = 4 (0x4) chip-id = 1 (0x1) version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002) device-id = 1217 (0x4c1) x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true bypass-iommu = false bus: pcie.1 type pnv-phb4-root-bus dev: pnv-phb4, id "pcie.0" index = 0 (0x0) chip-id = 0 (0x0) version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002) device-id = 1217 (0x4c1) x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true bypass-iommu = false bus: pcie.0 type pnv-phb4-root-bus And without setting any ids: qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv9,accel=tcg \ -device pnv-phb4,chip-id=0,index=0,id=pcie.0 \ -device pnv-phb4,chip-id=1,index=4,id=pcie.1 bus: main-system-bus type System dev: pnv-phb4, id "" index = 4 (0x4) chip-id = 1 (0x1) version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002) device-id = 1217 (0x4c1) x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true bypass-iommu = false bus: pnv-phb4-root-bus.1 type pnv-phb4-root-bus dev: pnv-phb4, id "" index = 0 (0x0) chip-id = 0 (0x0) version = 704374636546 (0xa400000002) device-id = 1217 (0x4c1) x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true bypass-iommu = false bus: pnv-phb4-root-bus.0 type pnv-phb4-root-bus Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20211228193806.1198496-17-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
2022-01-04pnv_phb3.c: do not set 'root-bus' as bus nameDaniel Henrique Barboza1-1/+2
All pnv-phb3-root-bus buses are being created as 'root-bus'. This makes it impossible to, for example, add a pnv-phb3-root-port in a specific root bus, since they all have the same name. By default the device will be parented by the pnv-phb3 device that precedeced it in the QEMU command line. Moreover, this doesn't all for custom bus naming. Libvirt, for instance, likes to name these buses as 'pcie.N', where 'N' is the index value of the controller in the domain XML, by using the 'id' command line attribute. At this moment this is also being ignored - the created root bus will always be named 'root-bus'. This patch fixes both scenarios by removing the 'root-bus' name from the pci_register_root_bus() call. If an "id" is provided, use that. Otherwise use 'NULL' as bus name. The 'NULL' value will be handled in qbus_init_internal() and it will defaulted as lowercase bus type + the global bus_id value. After this path we can define the bus name by using the 'id' attribute: qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv8,accel=tcg \ -device pnv-phb3,chip-id=0,index=1,id=pcie.0 dev: pnv-phb3, id "pcie.0" index = 1 (0x1) chip-id = 0 (0x0) x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true bypass-iommu = false bus: pcie.0 type pnv-phb3-root-bus And without an 'id' we will have the following default: qemu-system-ppc64 -m 4G -machine powernv8,accel=tcg \ -device pnv-phb3,chip-id=0,index=1 dev: pnv-phb3, id "" index = 1 (0x1) chip-id = 0 (0x0) x-config-reg-migration-enabled = true bypass-iommu = false bus: pnv-phb3-root-bus.0 type pnv-phb3-root-bus Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Message-Id: <20211228193806.1198496-3-danielhb413@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>