aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-03-08hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Implement SSE-200 and SSE-300 PID register valuesPeter Maydell1-2/+19
The SSE-200 and SSE-300 have different PID register values from the IoTKit for the sysctl register block. We incorrectly implemented the SSE-200 with the same PID values as IoTKit. Fix the SSE-200 bug and report these register values for SSE-300. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Handle SSE-300 changes to PDCM_PD_*_SENSE registersPeter Maydell1-2/+59
The sysctl PDCM_PD_*_SENSE registers control various power domains in the system and allow the guest to configure which conditions keep a power domain awake and what power state to use when the domain is in a low power state. QEMU doesn't model power domains, so for us these registers are dummy reads-as-written implementations. The SSE-300 has a different power domain setup, so the set of registers is slightly different: Offset SSE-200 SSE-300 --------------------------------------------------- 0x200 PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE 0x204 reserved PDCM_PD_CPU0_SENSE 0x208 reserved reserved 0x20c PDCM_PD_SRAM0_SENSE reserved 0x210 PDCM_PD_SRAM1_SENSE reserved 0x214 PDCM_PD_SRAM2_SENSE PDCM_PD_VMR0_SENSE 0x218 PDCM_PD_SRAM3_SENSE PDCM_PD_VMR1_SENSE Offsets 0x200 and 0x208 are the same for both, so handled in a previous commit; here we deal with 0x204, 0x20c, 0x210, 0x214, 0x218. (We can safely add new lines to the SSE300 vmstate because no board uses this device in an SSE300 yet.) Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Implement dummy version of SSE-300 PWRCTRL registerPeter Maydell1-0/+52
The SSE-300 has a new PWRCTRL register at offset 0x1fc (previously reserved). This register controls accessibility of some registers in the Power Policy Units (PPUs). Since QEMU doesn't implement the PPUs, we don't need to implement any real behaviour for this register, so we just handle the UNLOCK bit which controls whether writes to the register itself are permitted and otherwise make it be reads-as-written. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Handle INITSVTOR* for SSE-300Peter Maydell1-2/+25
The SSE-300 has only one CPU and so no INITSVTOR1. It does have INITSVTOR0, but unlike the SSE-200 this register now has a LOCK bit which can be set to 1 to prevent any further writes to the register. Implement these differences. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Handle CPU_WAIT, NMI_ENABLE for SSE-300Peter Maydell1-12/+76
In the SSE-300 the CPU_WAIT and NMI_ENABLE registers have moved offsets, so they are now where the SSE-200's WICCTRL and EWCTRL were. The SSE-300 does not have WICCTLR or EWCTRL at all, and the old offsets are reserved: Offset SSE-200 SSE-300 ----------------------------------- 0x118 CPUWAIT reserved 0x118 NMI_ENABLE reserved 0x120 WICCTRL CPUWAIT 0x124 EWCTRL NMI_ENABLE Handle this reshuffle, and the fact that SSE-300 has only one CPU and so only one active bit in CPUWAIT. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Add SSE-300 cases which match SSE-200 behaviourPeter Maydell1-1/+11
The SSE-300's iokit-sysctl device is similar to the SSE-200, but some registers have moved address or have different behaviours. In this commit we add case statements for the registers where the SSE-300 and SSE-200 have the same behaviour. Some registers are the same on all SSE versions and so need no code change at all. Putting both of these categories together covers: 0x0 SECDBGSTAT 0x4 SECDBGSET 0x8 SECDBGCLR 0xc SCSECCTRL 0x10 CLK_CFG0 -- this is like SSE-200 FCLK_DIV but with a different set of clocks being controlled; our implementation is a dummy reads-as-written anyway 0x14 CLK_CFG1 -- similar to SSE-200 SYSCLK_DIV; our implementation is a dummy 0x18 CLK_FORCE -- similar to SSE-200 but different bit allocations; we have a dummy implementation 0x100 RESET_SYNDROME -- bit allocation differs from SSE-200 but our implementation is a dummy 0x104 RESET_MASK -- bit allocation differs from SSE-200 but our implementation is a dummy 0x108 SWRESET 0x10c GRETREG 0x200 PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE -- some bit allocations differ, but our implementation is a dummy We also need to migrate the state of these registers which are shared between the SSE-200 and SSE-300, so update the vmstate 'needed' function to do this. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Remove is_sse200 flagPeter Maydell1-69/+187
Remove the is_sse200 flag in favour of just directly testing the new sse_version field. Since some of these registers exist in the SSE-300 but some do not or have different behaviour, we expand out the if() statements in the read and write functions into switch()es, so we have an easy place to put SSE-300 specific behaviour. (Until we do add the SSE-300 behaviour, the thing preventing us reaching the "unreachable" default cases is that armsse.c doesn't yet pass us an ARMSSE_SSE300 version.) Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/arm/armsse: Introduce SSE subsystem version propertyPeter Maydell1-4/+7
We model Arm "Subsystems for Embedded" SoC subsystems using generic code which is split into various sub-devices which are configurable by QOM properties to handle the behaviour differences between the SSE subsystems we implement. Currently the only sub-device which needs to change is the IOTKIT_SYSCTL device, and we do this with a mix of properties that directly specify divergent behaviours (eg CPUWAIT_RST) and passing it the SYS_VERSION register value as a way for it to distinguish IoTKit from SSE-200. The "pass SYS_VERSION" approach is already a bit hacky, since the IOTKIT_SYSCTL device has to know that the different part of the register value happens to be bits [31:28]. For SSE-300 this register is renamed SOC_IDENTITY and has a different format entirely, all of whose fields can be configured by the SoC integrator when they integrate the SSE into their SoC, and so "pass SYS_VERSION" breaks down completely. Switch to using a simple integer property representing an internal-to-QEMU enumeration of the SSE flavour. For the moment we only need this in IOTKIT_SYSCTL, but as we add SSE-300 support a few of the other devices will also need to know. We define and permit a value for the SSE-300 so we can start using it in subsequent commits which add SSE-300 support. The now-redundant is_sse200 flag in IoTKitSysCtl will be removed in the following commit. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2021-03-08hw/arm/mps2: Update old infocenter.arm.com URLsPeter Maydell1-1/+1
Update old infocenter.arm.com URLs to the equivalent developer.arm.com ones (the old URLs should redirect, but we might as well avoid the redirection notice, and the new URLs are pleasantly shorter). This commit covers the links to the MPS2 board TRM, the various Application Notes, the IoTKit and SSE-200 documents. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20210215115138.20465-25-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2020-09-22qom: simplify object_find_property / object_class_find_propertyDaniel P. Berrangé1-1/+1
When debugging QEMU it is often useful to put a breakpoint on the error_setg_internal method impl. Unfortunately the object_property_add / object_class_property_add methods call object_property_find / object_class_property_find methods to check if a property exists already before adding the new property. As a result there are a huge number of calls to error_setg_internal on startup of most QEMU commands, making it very painful to set a breakpoint on this method. Most callers of object_find_property and object_class_find_property, however, pass in a NULL for the Error parameter. This simplifies the methods to remove the Error parameter entirely, and then adds some new wrapper methods that are able to raise an Error when needed. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200914135617.1493072-1-berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
2020-07-10qom: Put name parameter before value / visitor parameterMarkus Armbruster1-1/+1
The object_property_set_FOO() setters take property name and value in an unusual order: void object_property_set_FOO(Object *obj, FOO_TYPE value, const char *name, Error **errp) Having to pass value before name feels grating. Swap them. Same for object_property_set(), object_property_get(), and object_property_parse(). Convert callers with this Coccinelle script: @@ identifier fun = { object_property_get, object_property_parse, object_property_set_str, object_property_set_link, object_property_set_bool, object_property_set_int, object_property_set_uint, object_property_set, object_property_set_qobject }; expression obj, v, name, errp; @@ - fun(obj, v, name, errp) + fun(obj, name, v, errp) Chokes on hw/arm/musicpal.c's lcd_refresh() with the unhelpful error message "no position information". Convert that one manually. Fails to convert hw/arm/armsse.c, because Coccinelle gets confused by ARMSSE being used both as typedef and function-like macro there. Convert manually. Fails to convert hw/rx/rx-gdbsim.c, because Coccinelle gets confused by RXCPU being used both as typedef and function-like macro there. Convert manually. The other files using RXCPU that way don't need conversion. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-Id: <20200707160613.848843-27-armbru@redhat.com> [Straightforwad conflict with commit 2336172d9b "audio: set default value for pcspk.iobase property" resolved]
2020-01-24qdev: set properties with device_class_set_props()Marc-André Lureau1-1/+1
The following patch will need to handle properties registration during class_init time. Let's use a device_class_set_props() setter. spatch --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h --sp-file ./scripts/coccinelle/qdev-set-props.cocci --keep-comments --in-place --dir . @@ typedef DeviceClass; DeviceClass *d; expression val; @@ - d->props = val + device_class_set_props(d, val) Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200110153039.1379601-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-08-16sysemu: Split sysemu/runstate.h off sysemu/sysemu.hMarkus Armbruster1-1/+1
sysemu/sysemu.h is a rather unfocused dumping ground for stuff related to the system-emulator. Evidence: * It's included widely: in my "build everything" tree, changing sysemu/sysemu.h still triggers a recompile of some 1100 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h, down from 5400 due to the previous two commits). * It pulls in more than a dozen additional headers. Split stuff related to run state management into its own header sysemu/runstate.h. Touching sysemu/sysemu.h now recompiles some 850 objects. qemu/uuid.h also drops from 1100 to 850, and qapi/qapi-types-run-state.h from 4400 to 4200. Touching new sysemu/runstate.h recompiles some 500 objects. Since I'm touching MAINTAINERS to add sysemu/runstate.h anyway, also add qemu/main-loop.h. Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-30-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> [Unbreak OS-X build]
2019-08-16Include hw/qdev-properties.h lessMarkus Armbruster1-0/+1
In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/qdev-properties.h triggers a recompile of some 2700 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h). Many places including hw/qdev-properties.h (directly or via hw/qdev.h) actually need only hw/qdev-core.h. Include hw/qdev-core.h there instead. hw/qdev.h is actually pointless: all it does is include hw/qdev-core.h and hw/qdev-properties.h, which in turn includes hw/qdev-core.h. Replace the remaining uses of hw/qdev.h by hw/qdev-properties.h. While there, delete a few superfluous inclusions of hw/qdev-core.h. Touching hw/qdev-properties.h now recompiles some 1200 objects. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-22-armbru@redhat.com>
2019-08-16Include migration/vmstate.h lessMarkus Armbruster1-0/+1
In my "build everything" tree, changing migration/vmstate.h triggers a recompile of some 2700 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h). hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience. Several other headers include it just to get VMStateDescription. The previous commit made that unnecessary. Include migration/vmstate.h only where it's still needed. Touching it now recompiles only some 1600 objects. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-16-armbru@redhat.com> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
2019-06-12Include qemu/module.h where needed, drop it from qemu-common.hMarkus Armbruster1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190523143508.25387-4-armbru@redhat.com> [Rebased with conflicts resolved automatically, except for hw/usb/dev-hub.c hw/misc/exynos4210_rng.c hw/misc/bcm2835_rng.c hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c hw/display/virtio-vga.c hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c; ui/cocoa.m fixed up]
2019-02-28hw/arm/armsse: Unify init-svtor and cpuwait handlingPeter Maydell1-12/+8
At the moment the handling of init-svtor and cpuwait initial values is split between armsse.c and iotkit-sysctl.c: the code in armsse.c sets the initial state of the CPU object by setting the init-svtor and start-powered-off properties, but the iotkit-sysctl.c code has its own code setting the reset values of its registers (which are then used when updating the CPU when the guest makes runtime changes). Clean this up by making the armsse.c code set properties on the iotkit-sysctl object to define the initial values of the registers, so they always match the initial CPU state, and update the comments in armsse.c accordingly. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2019-02-28hw/arm/iotkit-sysctl: Implement CPUWAIT and INITSVTOR*Peter Maydell1-4/+37
The CPUWAIT register acts as a sort of power-control: if a bit in it is 1 then the CPU will have been forced into waiting when the system was reset (which in QEMU we model as the CPU starting powered off). Writing a 0 to the register will allow the CPU to boot (for QEMU, we model this as powering it on). Note that writing 0 to the register does not power off a CPU. For this to work correctly we need to also honour the INITSVTOR* registers, which let the guest control where the CPU will load its SP and PC from when it comes out of reset. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2019-02-28hw/arm/iotkit-sysctl: Add SSE-200 registersPeter Maydell1-5/+240
The SYSCTL block in the SSE-200 has some extra registers that are not present in the IoTKit version. Add these registers (as reads-as-written stubs), enabled by a new QOM property. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2019-02-28hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Correct typo in INITSVTOR0 register namePeter Maydell1-8/+8
The iotkit-sysctl device has a register it names INITSVRTOR0. This is actually a typo present in the IoTKit documentation and also in part of the SSE-200 documentation: it should be INITSVTOR0 because it is specifying the initial value of the Secure VTOR register in the CPU. Correct the typo. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
2018-08-24hw/misc/iotkit-sysctl: Implement IoTKit system control elementPeter Maydell1-0/+261
The Arm IoTKit includes a system control element which provides a block of read-only ID registers and a block of read-write control registers. Implement a minimal version of this. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org