diff options
author | Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br> | 2022-10-28 15:36:17 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> | 2022-10-29 06:34:52 -0300 |
commit | fb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56 (patch) | |
tree | e6ea55504519b9d0aa62378aeade62bd6327a0e2 /target | |
parent | 63e4bf8e84721231ea447b0e4afcb0a4378763c2 (diff) | |
download | qemu-fb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56.zip qemu-fb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56.tar.gz qemu-fb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56.tar.bz2 |
target/ppc: Fix regression in Radix MMU
Commit 47e83d9107 ended up unintentionally changing the control flow
of ppc_radix64_process_scoped_xlate(). When guest_visible is false,
it must not raise an exception, even if the radix configuration is
not valid.
This regression prevented Linux boot in a nested environment with
L1 using TCG and emulating KVM (cap-nested-hv=on) and L2 using
KVM. L2 would hang on Linux's futex_init(), when it tested how a
futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() handled a fault, because L1 would
start a loop of trying to perform partition scoped translations
and raising exceptions.
Fixes: 47e83d9107 ("target/ppc: Improve Radix xlate level validation")
Reported-by: Victor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br>
Tested-by: VĂctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221028183617.121786-1-leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br>
[danielhb: use %"PRIu64" to print 'nls']
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target')
-rw-r--r-- | target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c | 29 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c index 00f2e9f..031efda 100644 --- a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ static void ppc_radix64_set_rc(PowerPCCPU *cpu, MMUAccessType access_type, static bool ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(int level, int psize, uint64_t nls) { + bool ret; + /* * Check if this is a valid level, according to POWER9 and POWER10 * Processor User's Manuals, sections 4.10.4.1 and 5.10.6.1, respectively: @@ -249,16 +251,25 @@ static bool ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(int level, int psize, uint64_t nls) */ switch (level) { case 0: /* Root Page Dir */ - return psize == 52 && nls == 13; + ret = psize == 52 && nls == 13; + break; case 1: case 2: - return nls == 9; + ret = nls == 9; + break; case 3: - return nls == 9 || nls == 5; + ret = nls == 9 || nls == 5; + break; default: - qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "invalid radix level: %d\n", level); - return false; + ret = false; + } + + if (unlikely(!ret)) { + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "invalid radix configuration: " + "level %d size %d nls %"PRIu64"\n", + level, psize, nls); } + return ret; } static int ppc_radix64_next_level(AddressSpace *as, vaddr eaddr, @@ -519,11 +530,13 @@ static int ppc_radix64_process_scoped_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, if (!ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(level++, *g_page_size, nls)) { fault_cause |= DSISR_R_BADCONFIG; - return 1; + ret = 1; + } else { + ret = ppc_radix64_next_level(cs->as, eaddr & R_EADDR_MASK, + &h_raddr, &nls, g_page_size, + &pte, &fault_cause); } - ret = ppc_radix64_next_level(cs->as, eaddr & R_EADDR_MASK, &h_raddr, - &nls, g_page_size, &pte, &fault_cause); if (ret) { /* No valid pte */ if (guest_visible) { |