diff options
| author | Su Hang <suhang16@mails.ucas.ac.cn> | 2018-03-06 15:04:50 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2018-03-06 14:01:28 +0100 |
| commit | 2b9aef6fcd96ba7ed8c1ee723e391901852d344c (patch) | |
| tree | fa569a91844570f495786edf9a47cf43ded9b243 /scripts/checkpatch.pl | |
| parent | fb8446d94ec7a3dc0c3a7e7da672406476f075ac (diff) | |
| download | qemu-2b9aef6fcd96ba7ed8c1ee723e391901852d344c.zip qemu-2b9aef6fcd96ba7ed8c1ee723e391901852d344c.tar.gz qemu-2b9aef6fcd96ba7ed8c1ee723e391901852d344c.tar.bz2 | |
checkpatch: add check for `while` and `for`
Adding check for `while` and `for` statements, which condition has more than
one line.
The former checkpatch.pl can check `if` statement, which condition has more
than one line, whether block misses brace round, like this:
'''
if (cond1 ||
cond2)
statement;
'''
But it doesn't do the same check for `for` and `while` statements.
Using `(?:...)` instead of `(...)` in regex pattern catch.
Because `(?:...)` is faster and avoids unwanted side-effect.
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Hang <suhang16@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Message-Id: <1520319890-19761-1-git-send-email-suhang16@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/checkpatch.pl')
| -rwxr-xr-x | scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index a88af61..d1fe79b 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -2352,8 +2352,9 @@ sub process { } } -# check for missing bracing round if etc - if ($line =~ /(^.*)\bif\b/ && $line !~ /\#\s*if/) { +# check for missing bracing around if etc + if ($line =~ /(^.*)\b(?:if|while|for)\b/ && + $line !~ /\#\s*if/) { my ($level, $endln, @chunks) = ctx_statement_full($linenr, $realcnt, 1); if ($dbg_adv_apw) { |