aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/hw
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHalil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2017-09-21 20:08:40 +0200
committerCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>2017-10-06 10:53:02 +0200
commit62a2554ec2630896d1299e1a282a64c7f3b00da0 (patch)
tree4df6b2fcf1b36f37d94da2b334350c2ab6d03925 /include/hw
parentf57ba05823b7c444133f0862077b45824a6a89b5 (diff)
downloadqemu-62a2554ec2630896d1299e1a282a64c7f3b00da0.zip
qemu-62a2554ec2630896d1299e1a282a64c7f3b00da0.tar.gz
qemu-62a2554ec2630896d1299e1a282a64c7f3b00da0.tar.bz2
390x/css: introduce maximum data address checking
The architecture mandates the addresses to be accessed on the first indirection level (that is, the data addresses without IDA, and the (M)IDAW addresses with (M)IDA) to be checked against an CCW format dependent limit maximum address. If a violation is detected, the storage access is not to be performed and a channel program check needs to be generated. As of today, we fail to do this check. Let us stick even closer to the architecture specification. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20170921180841.24490-5-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/hw')
-rw-r--r--include/hw/s390x/css.h1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/css.h b/include/hw/s390x/css.h
index 078356e..69b3747 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/css.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/css.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ typedef struct CcwDataStream {
#define CDS_F_MIDA 0x02
#define CDS_F_I2K 0x04
#define CDS_F_C64 0x08
+#define CDS_F_FMT 0x10 /* CCW format-1 */
#define CDS_F_STREAM_BROKEN 0x80
uint8_t flags;
uint8_t at_idaw;