aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/s390x
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJanosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>2020-10-22 06:31:34 -0400
committerCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>2020-10-22 15:47:27 +0200
commit3df4843d0e612a3c838e8d94c3e9c24520f2e680 (patch)
tree65acbcce796c20304e0a6705a40aabe5bac16609 /hw/s390x
parentdb08244a3a7ec312dfed3fd9b88e114281215458 (diff)
downloadqemu-3df4843d0e612a3c838e8d94c3e9c24520f2e680.zip
qemu-3df4843d0e612a3c838e8d94c3e9c24520f2e680.tar.gz
qemu-3df4843d0e612a3c838e8d94c3e9c24520f2e680.tar.bz2
s390x: pv: Remove sclp boundary checks
The SCLP boundary cross check is done by the Ultravisor for a protected guest, hence we don't need to do it. As QEMU doesn't get a valid SCCB address in protected mode this is even problematic and can lead to QEMU reporting a false boundary cross error. Fixes: db13387ca0 ("s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks") Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201022103135.126033-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw/s390x')
-rw-r--r--hw/s390x/sclp.c5
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index 00f1e46..0cf2290 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -285,11 +285,6 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
goto out_write;
}
- if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length), code)) {
- work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
- goto out_write;
- }
-
sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code);
out_write:
s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,