aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2019-07-19 12:20:01 -0500
committerEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>2019-07-19 13:19:18 -0500
commit5cf42b1c1f75499b467701926d3c9691d27712e1 (patch)
treedd0055f36f26ae0b5c6c16eb52a2f4977535471c
parente2b47666fe1544959c89bd3ed159e9e37cc9fc73 (diff)
downloadqemu-5cf42b1c1f75499b467701926d3c9691d27712e1.zip
qemu-5cf42b1c1f75499b467701926d3c9691d27712e1.tar.gz
qemu-5cf42b1c1f75499b467701926d3c9691d27712e1.tar.bz2
nbd: Initialize reply on failure
We've had two separate reports of different callers running into use of uninitialized data if s->quit is set (one detected by gcc -O3, another by valgrind), due to checking 'nbd_reply_is_simple(reply) || s->quit' in the wrong order. Rather than chasing down which callers need to pre-initialize reply, and whether there are any other uninitialized uses, it's easier to guarantee that reply will always be set by nbd_co_receive_one_chunk() even on failure. The uninitialized use happens to be harmless (the only time the variable is uninitialized is if s->quit is set, so the conditional results in the same action regardless of what was read from reply), and was introduced in commit 65e01d47. In fixing the problem, it can also be seen that all (one) callers pass in a non-NULL reply, so there is a dead conditional to also be cleaned up. Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Reported-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190719172001.19770-1-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--block/nbd.c5
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/block/nbd.c b/block/nbd.c
index 81edabb..57c1a20 100644
--- a/block/nbd.c
+++ b/block/nbd.c
@@ -640,12 +640,11 @@ static coroutine_fn int nbd_co_receive_one_chunk(
request_ret, qiov, payload, errp);
if (ret < 0) {
+ memset(reply, 0, sizeof(*reply));
s->quit = true;
} else {
/* For assert at loop start in nbd_connection_entry */
- if (reply) {
- *reply = s->reply;
- }
+ *reply = s->reply;
s->reply.handle = 0;
}