aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
author马文霜 <kevinnma@tencent.com>2015-07-01 15:41:41 +0200
committerMichael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2015-07-29 21:54:31 -0500
commit2060efae47c070df84db02e4d12012d5aa34053e (patch)
tree547cad392f691bc47727cc9463d497c7d3a7959b
parent8d64975c98d334de4f635afb5ced8b7704908b3b (diff)
downloadqemu-2060efae47c070df84db02e4d12012d5aa34053e.zip
qemu-2060efae47c070df84db02e4d12012d5aa34053e.tar.gz
qemu-2060efae47c070df84db02e4d12012d5aa34053e.tar.bz2
Fix irq route entries exceeding KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES
Last month, we experienced several guests crash(6cores-8cores), qemu logs display the following messages: qemu-system-x86_64: /build/qemu-2.1.2/kvm-all.c:976: kvm_irqchip_commit_routes: Assertion `ret == 0' failed. After analysis and verification, we can confirm it's irq-balance daemon(in guest) leads to the assertion failure. Start a 8 core guest with two disks, execute the following scripts will reproduce the BUG quickly: irq_affinity.sh ======================================================================== vda_irq_num=25 vdb_irq_num=27 while [ 1 ] do for irq in {1,2,4,8,10,20,40,80} do echo $irq > /proc/irq/$vda_irq_num/smp_affinity echo $irq > /proc/irq/$vdb_irq_num/smp_affinity dd if=/dev/vda of=/dev/zero bs=4K count=100 iflag=direct dd if=/dev/vdb of=/dev/zero bs=4K count=100 iflag=direct done done ======================================================================== QEMU setup static irq route entries in kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(), PIC and IOAPIC share the first 15 GSI numbers, take up 23 GSI numbers, but take up 38 irq route entries. When change irq smp_affinity in guest, a dynamic route entry may be setup, the current logic is: if allocate GSI number succeeds, a new route entry can be added. The available dynamic GSI numbers is 1021(KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES-23), but available irq route entries is only 986(KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES-38), GSI numbers greater than route entries. irq-balance's behavior will eventually leads to total irq route entries exceed KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES, ioctl(KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING) fail and kvm_irqchip_commit_routes() trigger assertion failure. This patch fix the BUG. Signed-off-by: Wenshuang Ma <kevinnma@tencent.com> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit bdf026317daa3b9dfa281f29e96fbb6fd48394c8) Conflicts: kvm-all.c * remove context dependency on bd2a8884 Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-rw-r--r--kvm-all.c17
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index dd44f8c..481c560 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -1142,9 +1142,17 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_get_virq(KVMState *s)
uint32_t *word = s->used_gsi_bitmap;
int max_words = ALIGN(s->gsi_count, 32) / 32;
int i, bit;
- bool retry = true;
-again:
+ /*
+ * PIC and IOAPIC share the first 16 GSI numbers, thus the available
+ * GSI numbers are more than the number of IRQ route. Allocating a GSI
+ * number can succeed even though a new route entry cannot be added.
+ * When this happens, flush dynamic MSI entries to free IRQ route entries.
+ */
+ if (!s->direct_msi && s->irq_routes->nr == s->gsi_count) {
+ kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes(s);
+ }
+
/* Return the lowest unused GSI in the bitmap */
for (i = 0; i < max_words; i++) {
bit = ffs(~word[i]);
@@ -1154,11 +1162,6 @@ again:
return bit - 1 + i * 32;
}
- if (!s->direct_msi && retry) {
- retry = false;
- kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes(s);
- goto again;
- }
return -ENOSPC;
}