aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>2021-11-12 17:04:54 +0000
committerPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>2021-12-15 10:11:34 +0000
commit229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e (patch)
tree741c9985b30d5db3c892efd115cb13c5b83a871b
parent76b56fdfc9fa43ec6e5986aee33f108c6c6a511e (diff)
downloadqemu-229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e.zip
qemu-229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e.tar.gz
qemu-229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e.tar.bz2
hw/intc: clean-up error reporting for failed ITS cmd
While trying to debug a GIC ITS failure I saw some guest errors that had poor formatting as well as leaving me confused as to what failed. As most of the checks aren't possible without a valid dte split that check apart and then check the other conditions in steps. This avoids us relying on undefined data. I still get a failure with the current kvm-unit-tests but at least I know (partially) why now: Exception return from AArch64 EL1 to AArch64 EL1 PC 0x40080588 PASS: gicv3: its-trigger: inv/invall: dev2/eventid=20 now triggers an LPI ITS: MAPD devid=2 size = 0x8 itt=0x40430000 valid=0 INT dev_id=2 event_id=20 process_its_cmd: invalid command attributes: invalid dte: 0 for 2 (MEM_TX: 0) PASS: gicv3: its-trigger: mapd valid=false: no LPI after device unmap SUMMARY: 6 tests, 1 unexpected failures Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Message-id: 20211112170454.3158925-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org Cc: Shashi Mallela <shashi.mallela@linaro.org> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
-rw-r--r--hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c39
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
index c929a9c..b99e63d 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
@@ -274,21 +274,36 @@ static bool process_its_cmd(GICv3ITSState *s, uint64_t value, uint32_t offset,
if (res != MEMTX_OK) {
return result;
}
+ } else {
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "%s: invalid command attributes: "
+ "invalid dte: %"PRIx64" for %d (MEM_TX: %d)\n",
+ __func__, dte, devid, res);
+ return result;
}
- if ((devid > s->dt.maxids.max_devids) || !dte_valid || !ite_valid ||
- !cte_valid || (eventid > max_eventid)) {
+
+ /*
+ * In this implementation, in case of guest errors we ignore the
+ * command and move onto the next command in the queue.
+ */
+ if (devid > s->dt.maxids.max_devids) {
qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
- "%s: invalid command attributes "
- "devid %d or eventid %d or invalid dte %d or"
- "invalid cte %d or invalid ite %d\n",
- __func__, devid, eventid, dte_valid, cte_valid,
- ite_valid);
- /*
- * in this implementation, in case of error
- * we ignore this command and move onto the next
- * command in the queue
- */
+ "%s: invalid command attributes: devid %d>%d",
+ __func__, devid, s->dt.maxids.max_devids);
+
+ } else if (!dte_valid || !ite_valid || !cte_valid) {
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "%s: invalid command attributes: "
+ "dte: %s, ite: %s, cte: %s\n",
+ __func__,
+ dte_valid ? "valid" : "invalid",
+ ite_valid ? "valid" : "invalid",
+ cte_valid ? "valid" : "invalid");
+ } else if (eventid > max_eventid) {
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "%s: invalid command attributes: eventid %d > %d\n",
+ __func__, eventid, max_eventid);
} else {
/*
* Current implementation only supports rdbase == procnum