//===--- ASTConcept.cpp - Concepts Related AST Data Structures --*- C++ -*-===// // // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// /// /// \file /// \brief This file defines AST data structures related to concepts. /// //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// #include "clang/AST/ASTConcept.h" #include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h" #include "clang/AST/ExprConcepts.h" #include "clang/AST/PrettyPrinter.h" #include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h" using namespace clang; static void CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(const ASTContext &C, const UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord &Detail, UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord *TrailingObject) { if (auto *E = dyn_cast(Detail)) new (TrailingObject) UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(E); else { auto &SubstitutionDiagnostic = *cast *>(Detail); StringRef Message = C.backupStr(SubstitutionDiagnostic.second); auto *NewSubstDiag = new (C) std::pair( SubstitutionDiagnostic.first, Message); new (TrailingObject) UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(NewSubstDiag); } } ASTConstraintSatisfaction::ASTConstraintSatisfaction( const ASTContext &C, const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) : NumRecords{Satisfaction.Details.size()}, IsSatisfied{Satisfaction.IsSatisfied}, ContainsErrors{ Satisfaction.ContainsErrors} { for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumRecords; ++I) CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(C, Satisfaction.Details[I], getTrailingObjects() + I); } ASTConstraintSatisfaction::ASTConstraintSatisfaction( const ASTContext &C, const ASTConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) : NumRecords{Satisfaction.NumRecords}, IsSatisfied{Satisfaction.IsSatisfied}, ContainsErrors{Satisfaction.ContainsErrors} { for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumRecords; ++I) CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(C, *(Satisfaction.begin() + I), getTrailingObjects() + I); } ASTConstraintSatisfaction * ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(const ASTContext &C, const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) { std::size_t size = totalSizeToAlloc( Satisfaction.Details.size()); void *Mem = C.Allocate(size, alignof(ASTConstraintSatisfaction)); return new (Mem) ASTConstraintSatisfaction(C, Satisfaction); } ASTConstraintSatisfaction *ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Rebuild( const ASTContext &C, const ASTConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) { std::size_t size = totalSizeToAlloc(Satisfaction.NumRecords); void *Mem = C.Allocate(size, alignof(ASTConstraintSatisfaction)); return new (Mem) ASTConstraintSatisfaction(C, Satisfaction); } void ConstraintSatisfaction::Profile( llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const ASTContext &C, const NamedDecl *ConstraintOwner, ArrayRef TemplateArgs) { ID.AddPointer(ConstraintOwner); ID.AddInteger(TemplateArgs.size()); for (auto &Arg : TemplateArgs) Arg.Profile(ID, C); } ConceptReference * ConceptReference::Create(const ASTContext &C, NestedNameSpecifierLoc NNS, SourceLocation TemplateKWLoc, DeclarationNameInfo ConceptNameInfo, NamedDecl *FoundDecl, TemplateDecl *NamedConcept, const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo *ArgsAsWritten) { return new (C) ConceptReference(NNS, TemplateKWLoc, ConceptNameInfo, FoundDecl, NamedConcept, ArgsAsWritten); } void ConceptReference::print(llvm::raw_ostream &OS, const PrintingPolicy &Policy) const { if (NestedNameSpec) NestedNameSpec.getNestedNameSpecifier()->print(OS, Policy); ConceptName.printName(OS, Policy); if (hasExplicitTemplateArgs()) { OS << "<"; llvm::ListSeparator Sep(", "); // FIXME: Find corresponding parameter for argument for (auto &ArgLoc : ArgsAsWritten->arguments()) { OS << Sep; ArgLoc.getArgument().print(Policy, OS, /*IncludeType*/ false); } OS << ">"; } } concepts::ExprRequirement::ExprRequirement( Expr *E, bool IsSimple, SourceLocation NoexceptLoc, ReturnTypeRequirement Req, SatisfactionStatus Status, ConceptSpecializationExpr *SubstitutedConstraintExpr) : Requirement(IsSimple ? RK_Simple : RK_Compound, Status == SS_Dependent, Status == SS_Dependent && (E->containsUnexpandedParameterPack() || Req.containsUnexpandedParameterPack()), Status == SS_Satisfied), Value(E), NoexceptLoc(NoexceptLoc), TypeReq(Req), SubstitutedConstraintExpr(SubstitutedConstraintExpr), Status(Status) { assert((!IsSimple || (Req.isEmpty() && NoexceptLoc.isInvalid())) && "Simple requirement must not have a return type requirement or a " "noexcept specification"); assert((Status > SS_TypeRequirementSubstitutionFailure && Req.isTypeConstraint()) == (SubstitutedConstraintExpr != nullptr)); } concepts::ExprRequirement::ExprRequirement( SubstitutionDiagnostic *ExprSubstDiag, bool IsSimple, SourceLocation NoexceptLoc, ReturnTypeRequirement Req) : Requirement(IsSimple ? RK_Simple : RK_Compound, Req.isDependent(), Req.containsUnexpandedParameterPack(), /*IsSatisfied=*/false), Value(ExprSubstDiag), NoexceptLoc(NoexceptLoc), TypeReq(Req), Status(SS_ExprSubstitutionFailure) { assert((!IsSimple || (Req.isEmpty() && NoexceptLoc.isInvalid())) && "Simple requirement must not have a return type requirement or a " "noexcept specification"); } concepts::ExprRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement( TemplateParameterList *TPL) : TypeConstraintInfo(TPL, false) { assert(TPL->size() == 1); const TypeConstraint *TC = cast(TPL->getParam(0))->getTypeConstraint(); assert(TC && "TPL must have a template type parameter with a type constraint"); auto *Constraint = cast(TC->getImmediatelyDeclaredConstraint()); bool Dependent = Constraint->getTemplateArgsAsWritten() && TemplateSpecializationType::anyInstantiationDependentTemplateArguments( Constraint->getTemplateArgsAsWritten()->arguments().drop_front(1)); TypeConstraintInfo.setInt(Dependent ? true : false); } concepts::ExprRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement( TemplateParameterList *TPL, bool IsDependent) : TypeConstraintInfo(TPL, IsDependent) {} concepts::TypeRequirement::TypeRequirement(TypeSourceInfo *T) : Requirement(RK_Type, T->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType(), T->getType()->containsUnexpandedParameterPack(), // We reach this ctor with either dependent types (in which // IsSatisfied doesn't matter) or with non-dependent type in // which the existence of the type indicates satisfaction. /*IsSatisfied=*/true), Value(T), Status(T->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType() ? SS_Dependent : SS_Satisfied) {}