From 1ce2015f7eb0aadfecf70d62d3c520e6d54823ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AdityaK <1894981+hiraditya@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:29:41 -0700
Subject: [NFC] check for UnreachableInst first as it is cheaper compared to
 getTerminatingDeoptimizeCall

Reviewers: craig.topper, aeubanks, Peter
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134490
---
 llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp')

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp
index 7509c48..5a66100 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp
@@ -600,8 +600,8 @@ bool llvm::IsBlockFollowedByDeoptOrUnreachable(const BasicBlock *BB) {
   unsigned Depth = 0;
   while (BB && Depth++ < MaxDeoptOrUnreachableSuccessorCheckDepth &&
          VisitedBlocks.insert(BB).second) {
-    if (BB->getTerminatingDeoptimizeCall() ||
-        isa<UnreachableInst>(BB->getTerminator()))
+    if (isa<UnreachableInst>(BB->getTerminator()) ||
+        BB->getTerminatingDeoptimizeCall())
       return true;
     BB = BB->getUniqueSuccessor();
   }
-- 
cgit v1.1