From 1a1531d65ee5dc9e025be69ab35ca0406a0c6ea0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chad Rosier Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:24:25 +0000 Subject: Replace the use of isPredicable() with isPredicated() in MachineBasicBlock::canFallThrough(). We're interested in the state of the instruction (i.e., is this a barrier or not?), not if the instruction is predicable or not. rdar://10501092 llvm-svn: 149070 --- llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.cpp | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.cpp') diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.cpp index b4a2ca1..0205c0a 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.cpp @@ -535,13 +535,12 @@ bool MachineBasicBlock::canFallThrough() { if (TII->AnalyzeBranch(*this, TBB, FBB, Cond)) { // If we couldn't analyze the branch, examine the last instruction. // If the block doesn't end in a known control barrier, assume fallthrough - // is possible. The isPredicable check is needed because this code can be + // is possible. The isPredicated check is needed because this code can be // called during IfConversion, where an instruction which is normally a // Barrier is predicated and thus no longer an actual control barrier. This // is over-conservative though, because if an instruction isn't actually // predicated we could still treat it like a barrier. - return empty() || !back().isBarrier() || - back().isPredicable(); + return empty() || !back().isBarrier() || TII->isPredicated(&back()); } // If there is no branch, control always falls through. -- cgit v1.1