From bacf7e4f397f5863e52a0fad4155abd9a6b84b8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yunzhong Gao Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:15:02 +0000 Subject: Do not define GXX_RTTI macro for C. This is same as GCC behavior (tested with GCC 4.8.2). Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16365 llvm-svn: 258850 --- clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp') diff --git a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp index a202996..4ad9a33 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp @@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ static void ParseLangArgs(LangOptions &Opts, ArgList &Args, InputKind IK, Opts.SjLjExceptions = Args.hasArg(OPT_fsjlj_exceptions); Opts.TraditionalCPP = Args.hasArg(OPT_traditional_cpp); - Opts.RTTI = !Args.hasArg(OPT_fno_rtti); + Opts.RTTI = Opts.CPlusPlus && !Args.hasArg(OPT_fno_rtti); Opts.RTTIData = Opts.RTTI && !Args.hasArg(OPT_fno_rtti_data); Opts.Blocks = Args.hasArg(OPT_fblocks); Opts.BlocksRuntimeOptional = Args.hasArg(OPT_fblocks_runtime_optional); -- cgit v1.1