| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
to prevent protential null deref
All these potential null pointer dereferences are reported by my static analyzer for null smart pointer dereferences, which has a different implementation from `alpha.cplusplus.SmartPtr`.
The checked pointers in this patch are initialized by Target::createXXX functions. When the creator function pointer is not correctly set, a null pointer will be returned, or the creator function may originally return a null pointer.
Some of them may not make sense as they may be checked before entering the function, but I fixed them all in this patch. I submit this fix because 1) similar checks are found in some other places in the LLVM codebase for the same return value of the function; and, 2) some of the pointers are dereferenced before they are checked, which may definitely trigger a null pointer dereference if the return value is nullptr.
Reviewed By: tejohnson, MaskRay, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91410
|
|
Make DebugLogging a member variable so that users of PassBuilder don't
need to pass it around so much.
Move call to TargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks() within
PassBuilder so users don't need to remember to call it.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90437
|
|
llvm::EmbedBitcodeInModule needs (what used to be called) EmbedMarker
set, in order to emit .llvmcmd. EmbedMarker is really about embedding the
command line, so renamed the parameter accordingly, too.
This was not caught at test because the check-prefix was incorrect, but
FileCheck does not report that when multiple prefixes are provided. A
separate patch will address that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90278
|
|
Changing to pass by ref - less null checks to worry about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90330
|
|
This completes the circle, complementing -lto-embed-bitcode
(specifically, post-merge-pre-opt). Using -thinlto-assume-merged skips
function importing. The index file is still needed for the other data it
contains.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87949
|
|
This will embed bitcode after (Thin)LTO merge, but before optimizations.
In the case the thinlto backend is called from clang, the .llvmcmd
section is also produced. Doing so in the case where the caller is the
linker doesn't yet have a motivation, and would require plumbing through
command line args.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87636
|
|
The current behavior of -lto-embed-bitcode is not quite the same as that
of -fembed-bitcode. While both populate .llvmbc with bitcode, the latter
populates it with pre-optimized bitcode(*), while the former with
post-optimized. The scenarios driving them are different - the latter's
goal is to allow re-compilation, while the former, IIUC, is execution.
I plan to add a third mode for thinlto cases, closely-related to
-fembed-bitcode's scenario: adding the bitcode pre-optimization, but
post-merging. This would allow re-compilation without requiring the
other .bc files that were merged (akin to how -fembed-bitcode allows
recompilation without all the .h files)
The third mode can't co-exist with the current -lto-embed-bitcode mode,
because the latter would overwrite it. For clarity, we change
-lto-embed-bitcode to be an enum.
(*) That's the compiler semantics. The driver splits compilation in 2
phases, so if -fembed-bitcode is given to the driver, the .llvmbc is
optimized bitcode; if the option is passed to the compiler (after -cc1),
the section is pre-optimized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87477
|
|
llvm::EmbedBitcodeInModule handles serializing the passed-in module, if
the provided MemoryBufferRef is invalid. This is already the path taken
in one of the uses of the API - clang::EmbedBitcode, when called from
BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit - so might as well do the same
here and reduce (by very little) code duplication.
The only difference this patch introduces is that the serialization happens
with ShouldPreserveUseListOrder set to true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87339
|
|
Instead, passing in the command line options, initialized to nullptr. In
an upcoming patch, we can then use the parameter to pass actual command
line options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87336
|
|
OptNoneInstrumentation is part of StandardInstrumentations. It skips
functions (or loops) that are marked optnone.
The feature of skipping optional passes for optnone functions under NPM
is gated on a -enable-npm-optnone flag. Currently it is by default
false. That is because we still need to mark all required passes to be
required. Otherwise optnone functions will start having incorrect
semantics. After that is done in following changes, we can remove the
flag and always enable this.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83519
|
|
Summary:
The patch wraps ThinLTO index into immutable
pass which can be used by StackSafety analysis.
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80985
|
|
Summary:
The working set size heuristics (ProfileSummaryInfo::hasHugeWorkingSetSize)
under the partial sample PGO may not be accurate because the profile is partial
and the number of hot profile counters in the ProfileSummary may not reflect the
actual working set size of the program being compiled.
To improve this, the (approximated) ratio of the the number of profile counters
of the program being compiled to the number of profile counters in the partial
sample profile is computed (which is called the partial profile ratio) and the
working set size of the profile is scaled by this ratio to reflect the working
set size of the program being compiled and used for the working set size
heuristics.
The partial profile ratio is approximated based on the number of the basic
blocks in the program and the NumCounts field in the ProfileSummary and computed
through the thin LTO indexing. This means that there is the limitation that the
scaled working set size is available to the thin LTO post link passes only.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, eraman, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79831
|
|
This should make both static and dynamic NewPM plugins work with LTO.
And as a bonus, it makes static linking of OldPM plugins more reliable
for plugins with both an OldPM and NewPM interface.
I only implemented the command-line flag to specify NewPM plugins in
llvm-lto2, to show it works. Support can be added for other tools later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76866
|
|
dso_local leads to direct access even if the definition is not within this compilation unit (it is
still in the same linkage unit). On ELF, such a relocation (e.g. R_X86_64_PC32) referencing a
STB_GLOBAL STV_DEFAULT object can cause a linker error in a -shared link.
If the linkage is changed to available_externally, the dso_local flag should be dropped, so that no
direct access will be generated.
The current behavior is benign, because -fpic does not assume dso_local
(clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:shouldAssumeDSOLocal).
If we do that for -fno-semantic-interposition (D73865), there will be an
R_X86_64_PC32 linker error without this patch.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74751
|
|
Otherwise ld.lld -save-temps will crash when writing to ResolutionFile.
llvm-lto2 -save-temps does not crash because it exits immediately.
Reviewed By: evgeny777
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75426
|
|
sockets and all NUMA groups
The goal of this patch is to maximize CPU utilization on multi-socket or high core count systems, so that parallel computations such as LLD/ThinLTO can use all hardware threads in the system. Before this patch, on Windows, a maximum of 64 hardware threads could be used at most, in some cases dispatched only on one CPU socket.
== Background ==
Windows doesn't have a flat cpu_set_t like Linux. Instead, it projects hardware CPUs (or NUMA nodes) to applications through a concept of "processor groups". A "processor" is the smallest unit of execution on a CPU, that is, an hyper-thread if SMT is active; a core otherwise. There's a limit of 32-bit processors on older 32-bit versions of Windows, which later was raised to 64-processors with 64-bit versions of Windows. This limit comes from the affinity mask, which historically is represented by the sizeof(void*). Consequently, the concept of "processor groups" was introduced for dealing with systems with more than 64 hyper-threads.
By default, the Windows OS assigns only one "processor group" to each starting application, in a round-robin manner. If the application wants to use more processors, it needs to programmatically enable it, by assigning threads to other "processor groups". This also means that affinity cannot cross "processor group" boundaries; one can only specify a "preferred" group on start-up, but the application is free to allocate more groups if it wants to.
This creates a peculiar situation, where newer CPUs like the AMD EPYC 7702P (64-cores, 128-hyperthreads) are projected by the OS as two (2) "processor groups". This means that by default, an application can only use half of the cores. This situation could only get worse in the years to come, as dies with more cores will appear on the market.
== The problem ==
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() API was introduced so that only *one hardware thread per core* was used. Once that API returns, that original intention is lost, only the number of threads is retained. Consider a situation, on Windows, where the system has 2 CPU sockets, 18 cores each, each core having 2 hyper-threads, for a total of 72 hyper-threads. Both heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() and hardware_concurrency() currently return 36, because on Windows they are simply wrappers over std::thread::hardware_concurrency() -- which can only return processors from the current "processor group".
== The changes in this patch ==
To solve this situation, we capture (and retain) the initial intention until the point of usage, through a new ThreadPoolStrategy class. The number of threads to use is deferred as late as possible, until the moment where the std::threads are created (ThreadPool in the case of ThinLTO).
When using hardware_concurrency(), setting ThreadCount to 0 now means to use all the possible hardware CPU (SMT) threads. Providing a ThreadCount above to the maximum number of threads will have no effect, the maximum will be used instead.
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() is similar to hardware_concurrency(), except that only one thread per hardware *core* will be used.
When LLVM_ENABLE_THREADS is OFF, the threading APIs will always return 1, to ensure any caller loops will be exercised at least once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71775
|
|
This extends the RemarkStreamer to allow for other emitters (e.g.
frontends, SIL, etc.) to emit remarks through a common interface.
See changes in llvm/docs/Remarks.rst for motivation and design choices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73676
|
|
Use the std::string conversion operator introduced in
d7049213d0fcda691c9e79f9b41e357198d99738.
|
|
This only works with regular LTO for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73597
|
|
Summary:
The old pass manager separated speed optimization and size optimization
levels into two unsigned values. Coallescing both in an enum in the new
pass manager may lead to unintentional casts and comparisons.
In particular, taking a look at how the loop unroll passes were constructed
previously, the Os/Oz are now (==new pass manager) treated just like O3,
likely unintentionally.
This change disallows raw comparisons between optimization levels, to
avoid such unintended effects. As an effect, the O{s|z} behavior changes
for loop unrolling and loop unroll and jam, matching O2 rather than O3.
The change also parameterizes the threshold values used for loop
unrolling, primarily to aid testing.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: zzheng, ychen, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72547
|
|
The lto::Config object saved on the global LTO object should not be
updated by any of the LTO backends. Otherwise we could run into
interference between threads utilizing it. Motivated by some proposed
changes that would have caused it to get modified in the ThinLTO
backends.
|
|
down to pass builder in ltobackend.
Currently CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP in clang
are not passed down to pass builder in ltobackend when new pass manager is
used. This is inconsistent with the behavior when new pass manager is used
and thinlto is not used. Such inconsistency causes slp vectorization pass
not being enabled in ltobackend for O3 + thinlto right now. This patch
fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72386
|
|
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71608
|
|
Summary:
This adds support for embedding bitcode in a binary during LTO. The libLTO gains supports the `-lto-embed-bitcode` flag. The option allows users of the LTO library to embed a bitcode section. For example, LLD can pass the option via `ld.lld -mllvm=-lto-embed-bitcode`.
This feature allows doing something comparable to `clang -c -fembed-bitcode`, but on the (LTO) linker level. Having bitcode alongside native code has many use-cases. To give an example, the MacOS linker can create a `-bitcode_bundle` section containing bitcode. Also, having this feature built into LLVM is an alternative to 3rd party tools such as [[ https://github.com/travitch/whole-program-llvm | wllvm ]] or [[ https://github.com/SRI-CSL/gllvm | gllvm ]]. As with these tools, this feature simplifies creating "whole-program" llvm bitcode files, but in contrast to wllvm/gllvm it does not rely on a specific llvm frontend/driver.
Patch by Josef Eisl <josef.eisl@oracle.com>
Reviewers: #llvm, #clang, rsmith, pcc, alexshap, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: tejohnson, mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, aheejin, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, #llvm, #clang
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68213
|
|
Summary: IR printing has not been correctly supported with (Thin)LTO if the new pass manager is enabled. Previously we only get outputs from backend(codegen) passes, as they are still under legacy pass manager even when the new pass manager is enabled. This patch addresses the issue and enables IR printing for optimization passes with new pass manager + (Thin)LTO setting.
Reviewers: fedor.sergeev, philip.pfaffe
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66253
llvm-svn: 369024
|
|
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
|
|
F_{None,Text,Append} are kept for compatibility since r334221.
llvm-svn: 367800
|
|
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
|
|
Summary:
With Split DWARF the resulting object file (then called skeleton CU)
contains the file name of another ("DWO") file with the debug info.
This can be a problem for remote compilation, as it will contain the
name of the file on the compilation server, not on the client.
To use Split DWARF with remote compilation, one needs to either
* make sure only relative paths are used, and mirror the build directory
structure of the client on the server,
* inject the desired file name on the client directly.
Since llc already supports the latter solution, we're just copying that
over. We allow setting the actual output filename separately from the
value of the DW_AT_[GNU_]dwo_name attribute in the skeleton CU.
Fixes PR40276.
Reviewers: dblaikie, echristo, tejohnson
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59673
llvm-svn: 363496
|
|
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363415
|
|
This reverts commit 6e6e3af55bb97e1a4c97375c15a2b0099120c5a7.
This breaks greendragon.
llvm-svn: 363343
|
|
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363328
|
|
Summary:
Trying to add the plumbing necessary to add tuning options to the new pass manager.
Testing with the flags for loop vectorize.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, jlebar, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59723
llvm-svn: 358763
|
|
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
|
|
This reverts commit 20fff32b7d1f1a1bd417b22aa9f26ededd97a3e5.
llvm-svn: 355976
|
|
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
|
|
Part 3 of CSPGO changes (mostly related to PassMananger).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54175
llvm-svn: 355330
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
Summary:
This fixes PR 37422
In ELF, non-weak symbols can also be non-prevailing. In this particular
PR, the __llvm_profile_* symbols are non-prevailing but weren't getting
dropped - causing multiply-defined errors with lld.
Also add a test, strong_non_prevailing.ll, to ensure that multiple
copies of a strong symbol are dropped.
To fix the test regressions exposed by this fix,
- do not mark prevailing copies for symbols with 'appending' linkage.
There's no one prevailing copy for such symbols.
- fix the prevailing version in dead-strip-fulllto.ll
- explicitly pass exported symbols to llvm-lto in fumcimport.ll and
funcimport_var.ll
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith,
dang, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54125
llvm-svn: 346436
|
|
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.
TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246
llvm-svn: 344685
|
|
This reverts r344519 due to failures in pipeline-parsing test.
llvm-svn: 344524
|
|
Summary:
All the PassBuilder::parse interfaces now return descriptive StringError
instead of a plain bool. It allows to make -passes/aa-pipeline parsing
errors context-specific and thus less confusing.
TODO: ideally we should also make suggestions for misspelled pass names,
but that requires some extensions to PassBuilder.
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe, chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53246
llvm-svn: 344519
|
|
This can be used to preserve profiling information across codebase
changes that have widespread impact on mangled names, but across which
most profiling data should still be usable. For example, when switching
from libstdc++ to libc++, or from the old libstdc++ ABI to the new ABI,
or even from a 32-bit to a 64-bit build.
The user can provide a remapping file specifying parts of mangled names
that should be treated as equivalent (eg, std::__1 should be treated as
equivalent to std::__cxx11), and profile data will be treated as
applying to a particular function if its name is equivalent to the name
of a function in the profile data under the provided equivalences. See
the documentation change for a description of how this is configured.
Remapping is supported for both sample-based profiling and instruction
profiling. We do not support remapping indirect branch target
information, but all other profile data should be remapped
appropriately.
Support is only added for the new pass manager. If someone wants to also
add support for this for the old pass manager, doing so should be
straightforward.
This is the LLVM side of Clang r344199.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson, dlj, erik.pilkington
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51249
llvm-svn: 344200
|
|
Currently the code-model does not get saved in the module IR,
so if a code model is specified when compiling with LTO,
it gets lost and is not propagated properly to LTO. This patch,
along with one for the front end, fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52322
llvm-svn: 342760
|
|
Summary:
Enable these passes for CFI and WPD in ThinLTO and LTO with the new pass
manager. Add a couple of tests for both PMs based on the clang tests
tools/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-cfi*.ll, but just test
through llvm-lto2 and not with distributed ThinLTO.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49429
llvm-svn: 337461
|
|
-fthinlto-index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47597
llvm-svn: 333677
|
|
llvm-svn: 332889
|
|
direct emission.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47091
llvm-svn: 332884
|
|
up to dwo output.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47089
llvm-svn: 332881
|
|
Summary:
This change is necessary for D46464, which will pass -1 as the Task
ID for distributed backends, so that the save temps files don't end
up with "4294967295" in their path. For distributed back ends, when -1
is passed, don't append any Task ID.
An existing test (tools/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto_backend.ll) will
fail without this change after D46464.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46488
llvm-svn: 331591
|
