| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
A follow-up commit will modify the memory-layout of `Value`, `User`, and
`MDNode`. First fix the comments to be doxygen-friendly (and to follow
the coding standards).
- Use "\brief" instead of "repeatedName -".
- Add a brief intro where it was missing.
- Remove duplicated comments from source files (and a couple of
noisy/trivial comments altogether).
llvm-svn: 219844
|
|
it has no value for us.
llvm-svn: 204704
|
|
User.cpp
never returns, which is true by design.
Initially assumed that the reason is llvm_unreachable being dependent on NDEBUG.
However, even if llvm_unreachable is replaced by __assume(false), VC still warns in
Release modes but not in Debug modes...
The real reason turned out to be optimization flags.
With /Od in Debug modes the warning is not issued whereas with /O1 it is.
I could not find any documentation to this effect, but it is reproducable:
Try compiling http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/khwfyc5d(v=vs.90).aspx
with /O1 and then with /Od.
llvm-svn: 204659
|
|
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
|
|
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
llvm-svn: 171359
|
