| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This lets us optimize away selects that perform the same address computation in
two different ways and is also the first step towards being able to handle
selects between two different, but compatible, address computations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38242
llvm-svn: 314794
|
|
TargetTransformInfo::enableMemCmpExpansion.
Summary:
Right now there are two functions with the same name, one does the work
and the other one returns true if expansion is needed. Rename
TargetTransformInfo::expandMemCmp to make it more consistent with other
members of TargetTransformInfo.
Remove the unused Instruction* parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38165
llvm-svn: 314096
|
|
Summary:
GEP merging can sometimes increase the number of live values and register
pressure across control edges and cause performance problems particularly if the
increased register pressure results in spills.
This change implements GEP unmerging around an IndirectBr in certain cases to
mitigate the issue. This is in the CodeGenPrepare pass (after all the GEP
merging has happened.)
With this patch, the Python interpreter loop runs faster by ~5%.
Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: eastig, junbuml, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36772
llvm-svn: 312930
|
|
warnings; other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 312053
|
|
As suggested in D37121, here's a wrapper for removeFromParent() + insertAfter(),
but implemented using moveBefore() for symmetry/efficiency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37239
llvm-svn: 312001
|
|
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 311288
|
|
If we want to substitute the relocation of derived pointer with gep of base then
we must ensure that relocation of base dominates the relocation of derived pointer.
Currently only check for basic block is present. However it is possible that both
relocation are in the same basic block but relocation of derived pointer is defined
earlier.
The patch moves the relocation of base pointer right before relocation of derived
pointer in this case.
Reviewers: sanjoy,artagnon,igor-laevsky,reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36462
llvm-svn: 311067
|
|
This only affects very small memcmp on x86 for now, but it
will become more important if we allow vector-sized load and
compares.
llvm-svn: 309711
|
|
As noted in the code comment, transforming this in the other direction might require
a separate transform here in CGP given the block-at-a-time DAG constraint.
Besides that theoretical motivation, there are 2 practical motivations for the
subtract-of-cmps form:
1. The codegen for both x86 and PPC is better for this IR (though PPC could be better still).
There is discussion about canonicalizing IR to the select form
( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/114885.html ),
so we probably need to add DAG transforms for those patterns anyway, but this improves the
memcmp output without waiting for that step.
2. If we allow vector-sized chunks for the load and compare, x86 is better prepared to convert
that to optimal code when using subtract-of-cmps, so another prerequisite patch is avoided
if we choose to enable that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34904
llvm-svn: 309597
|
|
Summary:
Since r293359, most dump() function are only defined when
`!defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)` holds. print() functions
only used by dump() functions are now unused in release builds,
generating lots of warnings. This patch only defines some print()
functions if they are used.
Reviewers: MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: arsenm, mzolotukhin, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35949
llvm-svn: 309553
|
|
This avoids excessive compile time. The case I'm looking at is
Function.cpp from an old version of LLVM that still had the giant memcmp
string matcher in it. Before r308322 this compiled in about 2 minutes,
after it, clang takes infinite* time to compile it. With this patch
we're at 5 min, which is still bad but this is a pathological case.
The cut off at 20 uses was chosen by looking at other cut-offs in LLVM
for user scanning. It's probably too high, but does the job and is very
unlikely to regress anything.
Fixes PR33900.
* I'm impatient and aborted after 15 minutes, on the bug report it was
killed after 2h.
llvm-svn: 308891
|
|
Allowing cycles in Phi traversal increases the scope of optimize memory instruction
in case we are in loop.
The added test shows an example of enabling optimization inside a loop.
Reviewers: loladiro, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35294
llvm-svn: 308419
|
|
optimizeMemoryInst contains a vector AddrModeInsts.
The only use of this vector is to check that all instructions are in the same
block as memory instruction. This check is guarded by PhiSeen flag,
so if we traversed through phi node then we do not need to keep information
in AddrModeInsts. AddModeInsts is set first time we found some addressing mode
and updated if we found new one later.
We can find next addressing mode only if we traverse phi node so all code
related to update of AddModeInsts can be safely removed.
Reviewers: loladiro, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35291
llvm-svn: 308265
|
|
Now, getUserCost() only checks the src and dst types of EXT to decide it is free
or not. This change first checks the types, then calls isExtFreeImpl(), and
check if EXT can form ExtLoad at last. Currently, only AArch64 has customized
implementation of isExtFreeImpl() to check if EXT can be folded into its use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34458
llvm-svn: 308076
|
|
When we fail to sink an instruction, we must make sure not to modify
the function; otherwise, we end up in an infinite loop because
CodeGenPrepare iterates until it doesn't make any changes.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33608 .
llvm-svn: 307866
|
|
CodeGenPrepare::optimizeMemoryInst contains a check that we do nothing
if all instructions combining the address for memory instruction is in the same
block as memory instruction itself.
However if any of these instruction are placed after memory instruction then
address calculation will not be folded to memory instruction.
The added test case shows an example.
Reviewers: loladiro, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34862
llvm-svn: 307628
|
|
Summary:
Arguably non-integral pointers probably shouldn't show up here at all,
but since the backend doesn't complain and this takes valid (according
to the Verifier) IR and makes it invalid, make sure not to introduce
any inttoptr instructions if we're dealing with non-integral pointers.
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33110
llvm-svn: 306737
|
|
llvm-svn: 306485
|
|
As noted in D34071, there are some IR optimization opportunities that could be
handled by normal IR passes if this expansion wasn't happening so late in CGP.
Regardless of that, it seems wasteful to knowingly produce suboptimal IR here,
so I'm proposing this change:
%s = sub i32 %x, %y
%r = icmp ne %s, 0
=>
%r = icmp ne %x, %y
Changing the predicate to 'eq' mimics what InstCombine would do, so that's just
an efficiency improvement if we decide this expansion should happen sooner.
The fact that the PowerPC backend doesn't eliminate the 'subf.' might be
something for PPC folks to investigate separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34416
llvm-svn: 306471
|
|
llvm-svn: 306452
|
|
This was a clean-up suggestion from:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34005
llvm-svn: 306438
|
|
succesor -> successor
llvm-svn: 306393
|
|
trunc
llvm-svn: 305936
|
|
llvm-svn: 305935
|
|
This is the last step needed to avoid regressions for x86 before we flip the switch to allow
expansion of the smallest set of memcpy() via CGP. The DAG version checks for constant strings,
so we need to do that here too.
FWIW, the 2 constant test is not handled by LibCallSimplifier::optimizeMemCmp() because that
code is limited to 8-bit constant arrays. LibCallSimplifier will also fail to optimize some 1
constant tests because its alignment requirements are too strict (shouldn't require alignment
for a constant operand).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34071
llvm-svn: 305734
|
|
Summary:
At present, `-profile-guided-section-prefix` is a `cl::Optional` option, which means it demands to be passed exactly zero or one times. Our build system makes it pretty tricky to guarantee this. We often accidentally pass the flag more than once (but always with the same "false" value) which results in an error, after which compilation fails:
```
clang (LLVM option parsing): for the -profile-guided-section-prefix option: may only occur zero or one times!
```
While we work on improving our build system, it also seems reasonable just to allow `-profile-guided-section-prefix` to be passed more than once, by to `cl::ZeroOrMore`. Quoting [[ http://llvm.org/docs/CommandLine.html#controlling-the-number-of-occurrences-required-and-allowed | the documentation ]]:
> The cl::ZeroOrMore modifier ... indicates that your program will allow the option to be specified zero or more times.
> ...
> If an option is specified multiple times for an option of the cl::opt class, only the last value will be retained.
Reviewers: danielcdh
Reviewed By: danielcdh
Subscribers: twoh, david2050, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34219
llvm-svn: 305413
|
|
We're currently passing endian-ness around as a param (and not uniformly),
so this eliminates the need for that. I'd like to add a constant fold
call too, and that requires a DL.
llvm-svn: 305129
|
|
llvm-svn: 305008
|
|
This matches the behavior used in the SDAG when expanding memcmp.
For reference, we're intentionally treating the earlier fortified call transforms differently after:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23093
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL233776
One motivation for not transforming nobuiltin calls is that it can interfere with sanitizers:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D19781
https://reviews.llvm.org/D19801
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34043
llvm-svn: 305007
|
|
The test diff for PowerPC shows we can better optimize if this case is one block.
For x86, there's would be a substantial difference if CGP expansion was enabled because branches are assumed
cheap and SDAG can't optimize across blocks.
Instead of this:
_cmp_eq8:
movq (%rdi), %rax
cmpq (%rsi), %rax
je LBB23_1
## BB#2: ## %res_block
movl $1, %ecx
jmp LBB23_3
LBB23_1:
xorl %ecx, %ecx
LBB23_3: ## %endblock
xorl %eax, %eax
testl %ecx, %ecx
sete %al
retq
We get this:
cmp_eq8:
movq (%rdi), %rcx
xorl %eax, %eax
cmpq (%rsi), %rcx
sete %al
retq
And that matches the optimal codegen that we get from the current expansion in SelectionDAGBuilder::visitMemCmpCall().
If this looks right, then I just need to confirm that vector-sized expansion will work from here, and we can enable
CGP memcmp() expansion for x86. Ie, we'll bypass the power-of-2 special cases currently optimized in SDAG because we
can lower the IR produced here optimally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34005
llvm-svn: 304987
|
|
This could be viewed as another shortcoming of the DAGCombiner:
when both operands of a compare are zexted from the same source
type, we should be able to compare the original types.
The effect on PowerPC perf is likely unnoticeable, but there's a
visible regression for x86 if we feed the suboptimal IR for memcmp
expansion to the DAG:
_cmp_eq4_zexted_to_i64:
movl (%rdi), %ecx
movl (%rsi), %edx
xorl %eax, %eax
cmpq %rdx, %rcx
sete %al
_cmp_eq4_better:
movl (%rdi), %ecx
xorl %eax, %eax
cmpl (%rsi), %ecx
sete %al
llvm-svn: 304923
|
|
Avoid extracting the constant int twice.
llvm-svn: 304920
|
|
Avoid extracting the constant int twice.
llvm-svn: 304917
|
|
llvm-svn: 304916
|
|
In the special (but also the likely common) case, we can avoid
the multi-block complexity of the general algorithm, so moving
this part off on its own will make it re-usable.
llvm-svn: 304908
|
|
llvm-svn: 304903
|
|
memcmp() expansion
I'd like to enable CGP memcmp expansion for x86, but the output from CGP would regress the
special cases (memcmp(x,y,N) != 0 for N=1,2,4,8,16,32 bytes) that we already handle.
I'm not sure if we'll actually be able to produce the optimal code given the block-at-a-time
limitation in the DAG. We might have to just avoid those special-cases here in CGP. But
regardless of that, I think this is a win for the more general cases.
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/cbQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33963
llvm-svn: 304849
|
|
llvm-svn: 304830
|
|
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
|
|
This patch does an inline expansion of memcmp.
It changes the memcmp library call into an inline expansion when the size is
known at compile time and is under a target specified threshold.
This expansion is implemented in CodeGenPrepare and expands into straight line
code. The target specifies a maximum load size and the expansion works by using
this size to load the two sources, compare, and exit early if a difference is
found. It also has a special case when the memcmp result is used in a compare
to zero equality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28637
llvm-svn: 304313
|
|
Rename the DEBUG_TYPE to match the names of corresponding passes where
it makes sense. Also establish the pattern of simply referencing
DEBUG_TYPE instead of repeating the passname where possible.
llvm-svn: 303921
|
|
Summary:
Implements PR889
Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing
This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal. However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue. I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.
I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261
llvm-svn: 303362
|
|
This provides a new way to access the TargetMachine through
TargetPassConfig, as a dependency.
The patterns replaced here are:
* Passes handling a null TargetMachine call
`getAnalysisIfAvailable<TargetPassConfig>`.
* Passes not handling a null TargetMachine
`addRequired<TargetPassConfig>` and call
`getAnalysis<TargetPassConfig>`.
* MachineFunctionPasses now use MF.getTarget().
* Remove all the TargetMachine constructors.
* Remove INITIALIZE_TM_PASS.
This fixes a crash when running `llc -start-before prologepilog`.
PEI needs StackProtector, which gets constructed without a TargetMachine
by the pass manager. The StackProtector pass doesn't handle the case
where there is no TargetMachine, so it segfaults.
Related to PR30324.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33222
llvm-svn: 303360
|
|
intrinsics to run also on -O0 option.
Currently, when masked load, store, gather or scatter intrinsics are used, we check in CodeGenPrepare pass if the subtarget support these intrinsics, if not we replace them with scalar code - this is a functional transformation not an optimization (not optional).
CodeGenPrepare pass does not run when the optimization level is set to CodeGenOpt::None (-O0).
Functional transformation should run with all optimization levels, so here I created a new pass which runs on all optimization levels and does no more than this transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32487
llvm-svn: 303050
|
|
Summary:
r284533 added hot and cold section prefixes based on profile
information, to enable grouping of hot/cold functions at link time.
However, it used "cold" as the prefix for cold sections, but gold only
recognizes "unlikely" (which is used by gcc for cold sections).
Therefore, cold sections were not properly being grouped. Switch to
using "unlikely"
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32983
llvm-svn: 302502
|
|
This relands r301424.
llvm-svn: 301812
|
|
llvm-svn: 301673
|
|
Commits were:
"Use WeakVH instead of WeakTrackingVH in AliasSetTracker's UnkownInsts"
"Add a new WeakVH value handle; NFC"
"Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC"
The changes assumed pointers are 8 byte aligned on all architectures.
llvm-svn: 301429
|
|
Summary:
I plan to use WeakVH to mean "nulls itself out on deletion, but does
not track RAUW" in a subsequent commit.
Reviewers: dblaikie, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, jfb, llvm-commits, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32266
llvm-svn: 301424
|
|
This patch uses lshrInPlace to replace code where the object that lshr is called on is being overwritten with the result.
This adds an lshrInPlace(const APInt &) version as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32155
llvm-svn: 300566
|
