| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
I've converted all known uses of None to std::nullopt, so we no longer
need to include None.h.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
getCanonicalMDString() also returns a nullptr for empty strings, which
tripped over the getSource() method. Solve the ambiguity of no source
versus an optional containing a nullptr by simply storing a pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138658
|
|
|
|
Many llvm/IR/* files have been migrated by other contributors.
This migrates most remaining files.
|
|
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
|
|
This restores commit 98ed423361de2f9dc0113a31be2aa04524489ca9 and
follow on fix 00c22351ba697dbddb4b5bf0ad94e4bcea4b316b, which were
reverted in 5d938eb6f79b16f55266dd23d5df831f552ea082 due to an
MSVC bot failure. I've included a fix for that failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135714
|
|
This reverts commit 00c22351ba697dbddb4b5bf0ad94e4bcea4b316b.
This reverts commit 98ed423361de2f9dc0113a31be2aa04524489ca9.
Seemingly MSVC has some kind of issue with this patch, in terms of linking:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/14137
I'll post more detail on D135714 momentarily.
|
|
This restores 47459455009db4790ffc3765a2ec0f8b4934c2a4, which was
reverted in commit 452a14efc84edf808d1e2953dad2c694972b312f, along with
fixes for a couple of bot failures.
|
|
This reverts commit 47459455009db4790ffc3765a2ec0f8b4934c2a4.
Revert while I try to fix a couple of non-Linux build failures.
|
|
Implements the ThinLTO summary support for memprof related metadata.
This includes support for the assembly format, and for building the
summary from IR during ModuleSummaryAnalysis.
To reduce space in both the bitcode format and the in memory index,
we do 2 things:
1. We keep a single vector of all uniq stack id hashes, and record the
index into this vector in the callsite and allocation memprof
summaries.
2. When building the combined index during the LTO link, the callsite
and allocation memprof summaries are only kept on the FunctionSummary
of the prevailing copy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135714
|
|
The Assignment Tracking debug-info feature is outlined in this RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/
rfc-assignment-tracking-a-better-way-of-specifying-variable-locations-in-ir
Add the DIAssignID metadata attachment boilerplate. Includes a textual-bitcode
roundtrip test and tests that the verifier and parser catch badly formed IR.
This piece of metadata links together stores (used as an attachment) and the
yet-to-be-added llvm.dbg.assign debug intrinsic (used as an operand).
Reviewed By: jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132222
|
|
This switches everything to use the memory attribute proposed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-unify-memory-effect-attributes/65579.
The old argmemonly, inaccessiblememonly and inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly
attributes are dropped. The readnone, readonly and writeonly attributes
are restricted to parameters only.
The old attributes are auto-upgraded both in bitcode and IR.
The bitcode upgrade is a policy requirement that has to be retained
indefinitely. The IR upgrade is mainly there so it's not necessary
to update all tests using memory attributes in this patch, which
is already large enough. We could drop that part after migrating
tests, or retain it longer term, to make it easier to import IR
from older LLVM versions.
High-level Function/CallBase APIs like doesNotAccessMemory() or
setDoesNotAccessMemory() are mapped transparently to the memory
attribute. Code that directly manipulates attributes (e.g. via
AttributeList) on the other hand needs to switch to working with
the memory attribute instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135780
|
|
This reverts commit c285df77e9b78f971f9cd9d025248c20b030cc2a.
A sanitizer bot found an issue:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/28809/steps/13/logs/stdio
|
|
The Assignment Tracking debug-info feature is outlined in this RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/
rfc-assignment-tracking-a-better-way-of-specifying-variable-locations-in-ir
Add the DIAssignID metadata attachment boilerplate. Includes a textual-bitcode
roundtrip test and tests that the verifier and parser catch badly formed IR.
This piece of metadata links together stores (used as an attachment) and the
yet-to-be-added llvm.dbg.assign debug intrinsic (used as an operand).
Reviewed By: jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132222
|
|
This implements IR and bitcode support for the memory attribute,
as specified in https://reviews.llvm.org/D135597.
The new attribute is not used for anything yet (and as such, the
old memory attributes are unaffected).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135592
|
|
This patch renames FuncletPadInst::getNumArgOperands to arg_size for
consistency with CallBase, where getNumArgOperands was removed in
favor of arg_size in commit 3e1c787b3160bed4146d3b2b5f922aeed3caafd7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136048
|
|
As discussed in [0], this diff adds the `skipprofile` attribute to
prevent the function from being profiled while allowing profiled
functions to be inlined into it. The `noprofile` attribute remains
unchanged.
The `noprofile` attribute is used for functions where it is
dangerous to add instrumentation to while the `skipprofile` attribute is
used to reduce code size or performance overhead.
[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/why-does-the-noprofile-attribute-restrict-inlining/64108
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130807
|
|
This allows the construct to be shared between different backends. However, it
still remains illegal to use TypedPointerType in LLVM IR--the type is intended
to remain an auxiliary type, not a real LLVM type. So no support is provided for
LLVM-C, nor bitcode, nor LLVM assembly (besides the bare minimum needed to make
Type->dump() work properly).
Reviewed By: beanz, nikic, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130592
|
|
llvm::sort is beneficial even when we use the iterator-based overload,
since it can optionally shuffle the elements (to detect
non-determinism). However llvm::sort is not usable everywhere, for
example, in compiler-rt.
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130406
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56290: when an ifunc is
aliased in LTO, clang will attempt to create an alias summary; however, as ifunc
is not included in the module summary, doing so will lead to crash.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129009
|
|
For MTE globals, we should have clang emit the attribute for all GV's
that it creates, and then use that in the upcoming AArch64 global
tagging IR pass. We need a positive attribute for this sanitizer (rather
than implicit sanitization of all globals) because it needs to interact
with other parts of LLVM, including:
1. Suppressing certain global optimisations (like merging),
2. Emitting extra directives by the ASM writer, and
3. Putting extra information in the symbol table entries.
While this does technically make the LLVM IR / bitcode format
non-backwards-compatible, nobody should have used this attribute yet,
because it's a no-op.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128950
|
|
Adds support for:
* `-mfunction-return=<value>` command line flag, and
* `__attribute__((function_return("<value>")))` function attribute
Where the supported <value>s are:
* keep (disable)
* thunk-extern (enable)
thunk-extern enables clang to change ret instructions into jmps to an
external symbol named __x86_return_thunk, implemented as a new
MachineFunctionPass named "x86-return-thunks", keyed off the new IR
attribute fn_ret_thunk_extern.
The symbol __x86_return_thunk is expected to be provided by the runtime
the compiled code is linked against and is not defined by the compiler.
Enabling this option alone doesn't provide mitigations without
corresponding definitions of __x86_return_thunk!
This new MachineFunctionPass is very similar to "x86-lvi-ret".
The <value>s "thunk" and "thunk-inline" are currently unsupported. It's
not clear yet that they are necessary: whether the thunk pattern they
would emit is beneficial or used anywhere.
Should the <value>s "thunk" and "thunk-inline" become necessary,
x86-return-thunks could probably be merged into x86-retpoline-thunks
which has pre-existing machinery for emitting thunks (which could be
used to implement the <value> "thunk").
Has been found to build+boot with corresponding Linux
kernel patches. This helps the Linux kernel mitigate RETBLEED.
* CVE-2022-23816
* CVE-2022-28693
* CVE-2022-29901
See also:
* "RETBLEED: Arbitrary Speculative Code Execution with Return
Instructions."
* AMD SECURITY NOTICE AMD-SN-1037: AMD CPU Branch Type Confusion
* TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR MITIGATING BRANCH TYPE CONFUSION REVISION 1.0
2022-07-12
* Return Stack Buffer Underflow / Return Stack Buffer Underflow /
CVE-2022-29901, CVE-2022-28693 / INTEL-SA-00702
SystemZ may eventually want to support "thunk-extern" and "thunk"; both
options are used by the Linux kernel's CONFIG_EXPOLINE.
This functionality has been available in GCC since the 8.1 release, and
was backported to the 7.3 release.
Many thanks for folks that provided discrete review off list due to the
embargoed nature of this hardware vulnerability. Many Bothans died to
bring us this information.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF6HbCKQHK8
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54404
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01197.html
Link: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/return-stack-buffer-underflow.html
Link: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/07/intel-and-amd-cpus-vulnerable-to-a-new-speculative-execution-attack/?comments=1
Link: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ce114c866860aa9eae3f50974efc68241186ba60
Link: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00702.html
Link: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00707.html
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129572
|
|
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
|
|
This removes the insertvalue constant expression, as part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
This is very similar to the extractvalue removal from D125795.
insertvalue is also not supported in bitcode, so no auto-ugprade
is necessary.
ConstantExpr::getInsertValue() can be replaced with
IRBuilder::CreateInsertValue() or ConstantFoldInsertValueInstruction(),
depending on whether a constant result is required (with the latter
being fallible).
The ConstantExpr::hasIndices() and ConstantExpr::getIndices()
methods also go away here, because there are no longer any constant
expressions with indices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128719
|
|
Remove some leftover bits of extractvalue handling after the
removal in D125795.
|
|
This implements an autoupgrade from constant expressions to
instructions, which is needed for
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
The basic approach is that constant expressions (CST_CODE_CE_*
records) now initially only create a BitcodeConstant value that
holds opcode, flags and operands IDs. Then, when the value actually
gets used, it can be converted either into a constant expression
(if that expression type is still supported) or into a sequence of
instructions. As currently all expressions are still supported,
-expand-constant-exprs is added for testing purposes, to force
expansion.
PHI nodes require special handling, because the constant expression
needs to be evaluated on the incoming edge. We do this by putting
it into a temporary block and then wiring it up appropriately
afterwards (for non-critical edges, we could also move the
instructions into the predecessor).
This also removes the need for the forward referenced constants
machinery, as the BitcodeConstants only hold value IDs. At the
point where the value is actually materialized, no forward
references are needed anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127729
|
|
This is required by @nikic in https://reviews.llvm.org/D127383 to
decrease the cost to check whether a function is a coroutine and this
fixes a FIXME too.
Reviewed By: rjmccall, ezhulenev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127471
|
|
Looks like comment on D126100 was unnoticed.
|
|
Plan is the migrate the global variable metadata for sanitizers, that's
currently carried around generally in the 'llvm.asan.globals' section,
onto the global variable itself.
This patch adds the attribute and plumbs it through the LLVM IR and
bitcode formats, but is a no-op other than that so far.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, kstoimenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126100
|
|
|
|
|
|
I chose to encode the allockind information in a string constant because
otherwise we would get a bit of an explosion of keywords to deal with
the possible permutations of allocation function types.
I'm not sure that CodeGen.h is the correct place for this enum, but it
seemed to kind of match the UWTableKind enum so I put it in the same
place. Constructive suggestions on a better location most certainly
encouraged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123088
|
|
Switch to the more common `Constant && !GlobalValue` test.
Use the more common `Worklist/Visited` variable names.
|
|
The original fix (commit 23ec5782c3cc) of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52787 only adds `Function`s
that have `Instruction`s that directly use `BlockAddress`es into the
bitcode (`FUNC_CODE_BLOCKADDR_USERS`).
However, in either @rickyz's original reproducing code:
```
void f(long);
__attribute__((noinline)) static void fun(long x) {
f(x + 1);
}
void repro(void) {
fun(({
label:
(long)&&label;
}));
}
```
```
...
define dso_local void @repro() #0 {
entry:
br label %label
label: ; preds = %entry
tail call fastcc void @fun()
ret void
}
define internal fastcc void @fun() unnamed_addr #1 {
entry:
tail call void @f(i64 add (i64 ptrtoint (i8* blockaddress(@repro, %label) to i64), i64 1)) #3
ret void
}
...
```
or the xfs and overlayfs in the Linux kernel, `BlockAddress`es (e.g.,
`i8* blockaddress(@repro, %label)`) may first compose `ConstantExpr`s
(e.g., `i64 ptrtoint (i8* blockaddress(@repro, %label) to i64)`) and
then used by `Instruction`s. This case is not handled by the original
fix.
This patch adds *indirect* users of `BlockAddress`es, i.e., the
`Instruction`s using some `Constant`s which further use the
`BlockAddress`es, into the bitcode as well, by doing depth-first
searches.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52787
Fixes: 23ec5782c3cc ("[Bitcode] materialize Functions early when BlockAddress taken")
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124878
|
|
This continues the push away from hard-coded knowledge about functions
towards attributes. We'll use this to annotate free(), realloc() and
cousins and obviate the hard-coded list of free functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123083
|
|
As implemented this patch assumes that Typed pointer support remains in
the llvm::PointerType class, however this could be modified to use a
different subclass of llvm::Type that could be disallowed from use in
other contexts.
This does not rely on inserting typed pointers into the Module, it just
uses the llvm::PointerType class to track and unique types.
Fixes #54918
Reviewed By: kuhar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122268
|
|
The patch adds SPIRV-specific MC layer implementation, SPIRV object
file support and SPIRVInstPrinter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116462
Authors: Aleksandr Bezzubikov, Lewis Crawford, Ilia Diachkov,
Michal Paszkowski, Andrey Tretyakov, Konrad Trifunovic
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezzubikov <zuban32s@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ilia Diachkov <iliya.diyachkov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Michal Paszkowski <michal.paszkowski@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Tretyakov <andrey1.tretyakov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Konrad Trifunovic <konrad.trifunovic@intel.com>
|
|
specifying DW_AT_trampoline as a string. Also update the signature
of DIBuilder::createFunction to reflect this addition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123697
|
|
IRLinker builds a work list of functions to materialize, then moves them
from a source module to a destination module one at a time.
This is a problem for blockaddress Constants, since they need not refer
to the function they are used in; IPSCCP is quite good at sinking these
constants deep into other functions when passed as arguments.
This would lead to curious errors during LTO:
ld.lld: error: Never resolved function from blockaddress ...
based on the ordering of function definitions in IR.
The problem was that IRLinker would basically do:
for function f in worklist:
materialize f
splice f from source module to destination module
in one pass, with Functions being lazily added to the running worklist.
This confuses BitcodeReader, which cannot disambiguate whether a
blockaddress is referring to a function which has not yet been parsed
("materialized") or is simply empty because its body was spliced out.
This causes BitcodeReader to insert Functions into its BasicBlockFwdRefs
list incorrectly, as it will never re-materialize an already
materialized (but spliced out) function.
Because of the possibility that blockaddress Constants may appear in
Functions other than the ones they reference, this patch adds a new
bitcode function code FUNC_CODE_BLOCKADDR_USERS that is a simple list of
Functions that contain BlockAddress Constants that refer back to this
Function, rather then the Function they are scoped in. We then
materialize those functions when materializing `f` from the example loop
above. This might over-materialize Functions should the user of
BitcodeReader ultimately decide not to link those Functions, but we can
at least now we can avoid this ordering related issue with blockaddresses.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52787
Fixes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1215
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120781
|
|
functions to return an array of bytes
Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` is better ergonomics for the hashing functions usage, instead of a `StringRef`:
* When returning `StringRef`, client code is "jumping through hoops" to do string manipulations instead of dealing with fixed array of bytes directly, which is more natural
* Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` avoids the need for the hasher classes to keep a field just for the purpose of wrapping it and returning it as a `StringRef`
As part of this patch also:
* Introduce `TruncatedBLAKE3` which is useful for using BLAKE3 as the hasher type for `HashBuilder` with non-default hash sizes.
* Make `MD5Result` inherit from `std::array<uint8_t, 16>` which improves & simplifies its API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123100
|
|
DXIL is wrapped in a container format defined by the DirectX 11
specification. Codebases differ in calling this format either DXBC or
DXILContainer.
Since eventually we want to add support for DXBC as a target
architecture and the format is used by DXBC and DXIL, I've termed it
DXContainer here.
Most of the changes in this patch are just adding cases to switch
statements to address warnings.
Reviewed By: pete
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122062
|
|
Cleanup a few extra files, this closes the work on libLLVM dependencies on my
side.
Impact on libLLVM preprocessed output: -35876 lines
Discourse thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122576
|
|
The one use check here is very misleading: At this point we should
actually have no uses, because the only possible use in llvm.used
was already dropped. But because the use in llvm.used is generally
bitcasted, we end up still having one dead use here.
What we actually want to check is that there are no live uses, for
which a helper has recently been added.
|
|
Bitcode currently cannot encode these. Throw a more obvious error
in this case, rather than failing an operand count assertion.
|
|
The constexpr source element type was enumerated if the GEP was
used as part of an instruction. However, things like global
initializers go through a different code path, and we need to
enumerate the type there as well.
|
|
Since D101045, allocas are no longer required to be part of the
default alloca address space. There may be allocas in multiple
different address spaces. However, the bitcode reader would
simply assume the default alloca address space, resulting in
either an error or incorrect IR.
Add an optional record for allocas which encodes the address
space.
|
|
This will let us start moving away from hard-coded attributes in
MemoryBuiltins.cpp and put the knowledge about various attribute
functions in the compilers that emit those calls where it probably
belongs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117921
|
|
Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling
-fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang
frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by
no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the
BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the
attribute.
The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively
disable sanitizer pass on certain functions.
In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional
function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the
BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In
order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772)
to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking
pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
|
|
`WriteIndexToFile` is used by external projects so I do not touch it.
|
