| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Summary:
Support ConstantInt::get() and Constant::getAllOnesValue() for scalable
vector type, this requires ConstantVector::getSplat() to take in 'ElementCount',
instead of 'unsigned' number of element count.
This change is needed for D73753.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, apazos, spatel, huntergr, willlovett
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74386
|
|
This is part of the IR sibling for:
D75576
Related transform committed with:
rG8ec71585719d
|
|
This is part of the IR sibling for:
D75576
(I'm splitting part of the transform as a separate commit
to reduce risk. I don't know of any bugs that might be
exposed by this improved folding, but it's hard to see
those in advance...)
|
|
|
|
Summary:
Cost modelling strikes again.
In PR44668 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44668> patch series,
i've made the same mistake of always using generic `getOperationCost()`
that i missed in reviewing D73480/D74495 which was later fixed
in 62dd44d76da9aa596fb199bda8b1e8768bb41033.
We should be using more specific hooks instead - `getCastInstrCost()`,
`getArithmeticInstrCost()`, `getCmpSelInstrCost()`.
Evidently, this does not have an effect on the existing testcases,
with unchanged default cost budget. But if it *does* have an effect
on some target, we'll have to segregate tests that use this function
per-target, much like we already do with other TTI-aware transform tests.
There's also an issue that @samparker has brought up in post-commit-review:
>>! In D73501#1905171, @samparker wrote:
> Hi,
> Did you get performance numbers for these patches? We track the performance
> of our (Arm) open source DSP library and the cost model fixes were generally
> a notable improvement, so many thanks for that! But the final patch
> for rewriting exit values has generally been bad, especially considering
> the gains from the modelling improvements. I need to look into it further,
> but on my current test case I'm seeing +30% increase in stack accesses
> with a similar decrease in performance.
> I'm just wondering if you observed any negative effects yourself?
I don't know if this addresses that, or we need D66450 for that.
Reviewers: samparker, spatel, mkazantsev, reames, wmi
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits, samparker
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75908
|
|
Summary:
For scalable vector, index out-of-bound can not be determined at compile-time.
The same apply for VectorUtil findScalarElement().
Add test cases to check the functionality of SimplifyInsert/ExtractElementInst for scalable vector.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, spatel, apazos
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: cameron.mcinally, tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75782
|
|
Refines the gather/scatter cost model, but also changes the TTI
function getIntrinsicInstrCost to accept an additional parameter
which is needed for the gather/scatter cost evaluation.
This did require trivial changes in some non-ARM backends to
adopt the new parameter.
Extending gathers and truncating scatters are now priced cheaper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75525
|
|
If a call argument has the "returned" attribute, we can simplify
the call to the value of that argument. The "-inst-simplify" pass
already handled this for the constant integer argument case via
known bits, which is invoked in SimplifyInstruction. However,
non-constant (or non-int) arguments are not handled at all right now.
This addresses one of the regressions from D75801.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75815
|
|
As pointed out by jdoerfert on D75815, we must be careful when
simplifying musttail calls: We can only replace the return value
if we can eliminate the call entirely. As we can't make this
guarantee for all consumers of InstSimplify, this patch disables
simplification of musttail calls. Without this patch, musttail
simplification currently results in module verification errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75824
|
|
With the addition of the LLD time tracing it made sense to include coverage
for LLVM's various passes. Doing so ensures that ThinLTO is also covered
with a time trace.
Before:
{F11333974}
After:
{F11333928}
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74516
|
|
Summary:
This folds the following family of intrinsics:
llvm.amdgcn.cubeid (face id)
llvm.amdgcn.cubema (major axis)
llvm.amdgcn.cubesc (S coordinate)
llvm.amdgcn.cubetc (T coordinate)
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75187
|
|
Reviewers: ekatz, spatel, jfb, tlively, craig.topper, RKSimon, nikic, scanon
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, dexonsmith, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75744
|
|
conditions of dominating blocks' terminators
Summary:
```
br i1 c, BB1, BB2:
BB1:
use1(c)
BB2:
use2(c)
```
In BB1 and BB2, c is never undef or poison because otherwise the branch would have triggered UB.
This is a resubmission of 952ad47 with crash fix of llvm/test/Transforms/LoopRotate/freeze-crash.ll.
Checked with Alive2
Reviewers: xbolva00, spatel, lebedev.ri, reames, jdoerfert, nlopes, sanjoy
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: jdoerfert, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75401
|
|
branch conditions of dominating blocks' terminators"
That commit causes SIGSEGV on some simple tests.
This reverts commit 952ad4701cf0d8da79789f6b83ddaa386c60d535.
|
|
InstSimplify can fold icmps of gep where the base pointers are the
same and the offsets are constant. It does so by constructing a
constant expression icmp and assumes that it gets folded -- but
this doesn't actually happen, because GEP expressions can usually
only be folded by the target-dependent constant folding layer.
As such, we need to explicitly invoke it here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75407
|
|
Spin-off from D75407. As described there, ConstantFoldConstant()
currently returns null for non-ConstantExpr/ConstantVector inputs,
but otherwise always returns non-null, independently of whether
any folding has happened or not.
This is confusing and makes consumer code more complicated.
I would expect either that ConstantFoldConstant() returns only if
it actually folded something, or that it always returns non-null.
I'm going to the latter possibility here, which appears to be more
useful considering existing usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75543
|
|
should not be shared with general accesses(PR42151).
Summary:
This is second attempt to fix the problem with incorrect dependencies reported in presence of invariant load. Initial fix (https://reviews.llvm.org/D64405) was reverted due to a regression reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D70516.
The original fix changed caching behavior for invariant loads. Namely such loads are not put into the second level cache (NonLocalDepInfo). The problem with that fix is the first level cache (CachedNonLocalPointerInfo) still works as if invariant loads were in the second level cache. The solution is in addition to not putting dependence results into the second level cache avoid putting info about invariant loads into the first level cache as well.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, reames, hfinkel, efriedma
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: DaniilSuchkov, hiraditya, bmahjour, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73027
|
|
conditions of dominating blocks' terminators
Summary:
```
br i1 c, BB1, BB2:
BB1:
use1(c)
BB2:
use2(c)
```
In BB1 and BB2, c is never undef or poison because otherwise the branch would have triggered UB.
Checked with Alive2
Reviewers: xbolva00, spatel, lebedev.ri, reames, jdoerfert, nlopes, sanjoy
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: jdoerfert, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75401
|
|
Summary: This patch adds an analysis pass to collect loop nests and
summarize properties of the nest (e.g the nest depth, whether the nest
is perfect, what's the innermost loop, etc...).
The motivation for this patch was discussed at the latest meeting of the
LLVM loop group (https://ibm.box.com/v/llvm-loop-nest-analysis) where we
discussed
the unimodular loop transformation framework ( “A Loop Transformation
Theory and an Algorithm to Maximize Parallelism”, Michael E. Wolf and
Monica S. Lam, IEEE TPDS, October 1991). The unimodular framework
provides a convenient way to unify legality checking and code generation
for several loop nest transformations (e.g. loop reversal, loop
interchange, loop skewing) and their compositions. Given that the
unimodular framework is applicable to perfect loop nests this is one
property of interest we expose in this analysis. Several other utility
functions are also provided. In the future other properties of interest
can be added in a centralized place.
Authored By: etiotto
Reviewer: Meinersbur, bmahjour, kbarton, Whitney, dmgreen, fhahn,
reames, hfinkel, jdoerfert, ppc-slack
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: bryanpkc, ppc-slack, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68789
|
|
This reverts commit 3a063d68e3c97136d10a2e770f389e6c13c3b317.
Broke the build with modules enabled:
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/lldb-cmake/10655/console .
|
|
Summary: This patch adds an analysis pass to collect loop nests and
summarize properties of the nest (e.g the nest depth, whether the nest
is perfect, what's the innermost loop, etc...).
The motivation for this patch was discussed at the latest meeting of the
LLVM loop group (https://ibm.box.com/v/llvm-loop-nest-analysis) where we
discussed
the unimodular loop transformation framework ( “A Loop Transformation
Theory and an Algorithm to Maximize Parallelism”, Michael E. Wolf and
Monica S. Lam, IEEE TPDS, October 1991). The unimodular framework
provides a convenient way to unify legality checking and code generation
for several loop nest transformations (e.g. loop reversal, loop
interchange, loop skewing) and their compositions. Given that the
unimodular framework is applicable to perfect loop nests this is one
property of interest we expose in this analysis. Several other utility
functions are also provided. In the future other properties of interest
can be added in a centralized place.
Authored By: etiotto
Reviewer: Meinersbur, bmahjour, kbarton, Whitney, dmgreen, fhahn,
reames, hfinkel, jdoerfert, ppc-slack
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: bryanpkc, ppc-slack, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68789
|
|
Summary: This follows up D67377 that added the isHot side.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75283
|
|
mentioning about br
Summary:
This patch helps getGuaranteedNonFullPoisonOp handle llvm.assume call.
Also, a comment about the semantics of branch is removed to prevent confusion.
As llvm.assume does, branching on poison directly raises UB (as LangRef says), and this allows transformations such as introduction of llvm.assume on branch condition at each successor, or freely replacing values after conditional branch (such as at loop exit).
Handling br is not addressed in this patch. It makes SCEV more accurate, causing existing LoopVectorize/IndVar/etc tests to fail.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, nlopes
Reviewed By: nlopes
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75397
|
|
Summary:
This patch helps isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison return true if the value
makes the program always undefined.
According to value tracking functions' comments, it is not still in consensus
whether a poison value can be bitwise or not, so conservatively only the case with
i1 is considered.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, reames, nlopes, regehr
Reviewed By: nlopes
Subscribers: uenoku, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75396
|
|
Summary:
Final patch in series to fix inlining between functions with different
nobuiltin attributes/options, which was specifically an issue in LTO.
See discussion on D61634 for background.
The prior patch in this series (D67923) enabled per-Function TLI
construction that identified the nobuiltin attributes.
Here I have allowed inlining to proceed if the callee's nobuiltins are a
subset of the caller's nobuiltins, but not in the reverse case, which
should be conservatively correct. This is controlled by a new option,
-inline-caller-superset-nobuiltin, which is enabled by default.
Reviewers: hfinkel, gchatelet, chandlerc, davidxl
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, mehdi_amini, eraman, hiraditya, haicheng, dexonsmith, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74162
|
|
According to Joseph Myers, a libm maintainer
> They were only ever an ABI (selected by use of -ffinite-math-only or
> options implying it, which resulted in the headers using "asm" to redirect
> calls to some libm functions), not an API. The change means that ABI has
> turned into compat symbols (only available for existing binaries, not for
> anything newly linked, not included in static libm at all, not included in
> shared libm for future glibc ports such as RV32), so, yes, in any case
> where tools generate direct calls to those functions (rather than just
> following the "asm" annotations on function declarations in the headers),
> they need to stop doing so.
As a consequence, we should no longer assume these symbols are available on the
target system.
Still keep the TargetLibraryInfo for constant folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74712
|
|
Summary:
Currently the dependence analysis in LLVM is unable to compute accurate
dependence vectors for multi-dimensional fixed size arrays.
This is mainly because the delinearization algorithm in scalar evolution
relies on parametric terms to be present in the access functions. In the
case of fixed size arrays such parametric terms are not present, but we
can use the indexes from GEP instructions to recover the subscripts for
each dimension of the arrays. This patch adds this ability under the
existing option `-da-disable-delinearization-checks`.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, sebpop, fhahn, dmgreen, grosser, etiotto, bollu
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, Whitney, ppc-slack, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72178
|
|
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75179
|
|
Add extra diagnostics for the inline cost analysis under
-print-instruction-deltas cl option. When enabled along with
-debug-only=inline-cost it prints the IR of inline candidate
annotated with cost and threshold change per every instruction.
Reviewed By: apilipenko, davidxl, mtrofin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71501
|
|
SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansion()
Summary: This addresses the `llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/elim-extend.ll` `@nestedIV` regression from D73728
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73777
|
|
Summary:
Previosly we simply always said that `SCEVMinMaxExpr` is too costly to expand.
But this isn't really true, it expands into just a comparison+swap pair.
And again much like with add/mul, there will be one less such pair
than the number of operands. And we need to count the cost of operands themselves.
This does change a number of testcases, and as far as i can tell,
all of these changes are improvements, in the sense that
we fixed up more latches to do the [in]equality comparison.
This concludes cost-modelling changes, no other SCEV expressions exist as of now.
This is a part of addressing [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44668 | PR44668 ]].
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73744
|
|
recurrence
Summary:
So, i wouldn't call this *obviously* correct,
but i think i got it right this time :)
Roughly, we have
```
Op0*x^0 + Op1*x^1 + Op2*x^2 ...
```
where `Op_{n} * x^{n}` is called term, and `n` the degree of term.
Due to the way they are stored internally in `SCEVAddRecExpr`,
i believe we can have `Op_{n}` to be `0`, so we should not charge for those.
I think it is most straight-forward to count the cost in 4 steps:
1. First, count it the same way we counted `scAddExpr`, but be sure to skip terms with zero constants.
Much like with `add` expr we will have one less addition than number of terms.
2. Each non-constant term (term degree >= 1) requires a multiplication between the `Op_{n}` and `x^{n}`.
But again, only charge for it if it is required - `Op_{n}` must not be 0 (no term) or 1 (no multiplication needed),
and obviously don't charge constant terms (`x^0 == 1`).
3. We must charge for all the `x^0`..`x^{poly_degree}` themselves.
Since `x^{poly_degree}` is `x * x * ... * x`, i.e. `poly_degree` `x`'es multiplied,
for final `poly_degree` term we again require `poly_degree-1` multiplications.
Note that all the `x^{0}`..`x^{poly_degree-1}` will be computed for the free along the way there.
4. And finally, the operands themselves.
Here, much like with add/mul exprs, we really don't look for preexisting instructions..
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73741
|
|
Summary:
While this resolves the regression from D73722 in `llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/exit_value_test2.ll`,
this now regresses `llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarSimplify/elim-extend.ll` `@nestedIV` test,
we no longer can perform that expansion within default budget of `4`, but require budget of `6`.
That regression is being addressed by D73777.
The basic idea here is simple.
```
Op0, Op1, Op2 ...
| | |
\--+--/ |
| |
\---+---/
```
I.e. given N operands, we will have N-1 operations,
so we have to add cost of an add (mul) for **every** Op processed,
**except** the first one, plus we need to recurse into *every* Op.
I'm guessing there's already canonicalization that ensures we won't
have `1` operand in `scMulExpr`, and no `0` in `scAddExpr`/`scMulExpr`.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73728
|
|
Summary:
If we don't believe this UDiv is actually a LShr in disguise, things are much worse.
First, we try to see if this UDiv actually originates from user code,
by looking for `S + 1`, and if found considering this UDiv to be free.
But otherwise, we always considered this UDiv to be high-cost.
However that is no longer the case with TTI-driven cost model:
our default budget is 4, which matches the default cost of UDiv,
so now we allow a single UDiv to not be counted as high-cost.
While that is the case, it is evident this is actually a regression
due to the fact that cost-modelling is incomplete - we did not account
for the `add`, `mul` costs yet. That is being addressed in D73728.
Cost-modelling for UDiv also seems pretty straight-forward:
subtract cost of the UDiv itself, and recurse into both the LHS and RHS.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73722
|
|
power-of-two as LShr
Summary:
Like with casts, we need to subtract the cost of `lshr` instruction
from budget, and recurse into LHS operand.
Seems "pretty obviously correct" to me?
To be noted, there is a number of other shortcuts we //could// cost-model:
* `... + (-1 * ...)` -> `... - ...` <- likely very frequent case
* `x - (rem x, power-of-2)`, which is currently `(x udiv power-of-2) * power-of-2` -> `x & -log2(power-of-2)`
* `rem x, power-of-2`, which is currently `x - ((x udiv power-of-2) * power-of-2)` -> `x & log2(power-of-2)-1`
* `... * power-of-2` -> `... << log2(power-of-2)` <- likely not very beneficial
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73718
|
|
model cast cost
Summary:
This is not a NFC, although it does not change any of the existing tests.
I'm not really sure if we should have specific tests for the cost modelling itself.
This is the first patch that actually makes `SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper()`
account for the cost of the SCEV expression, and consider the budget available,
by modelling cast expressions.
I believe the logic itself is "pretty obviously correct" - from budget,
we need to subtract the cost of the cast expression from inner type `Op->getType()`
to the `S->getType()` type, and recurse into the expression we are casting.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73716
|
|
Summary:
Currently, as per `check-llvm`, we never call `SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansion()` with null TTI,
so this appears to be a safe restriction.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73712
|
|
processed expression first
Summary:
As far as i can tell this is still NFC.
Initially in rL146438 it was added at the top of the function,
later rL238507 dethroned it, and rL244474 did it again.
I'm not sure if we have already checked the cost of this expansion, we should be doing that again.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy, atrick, igor-laevsky
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73706
|
|
SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper()
Summary:
In future patches`SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper()` will respect the budget allocated by performing TTI cost modelling.
This is a fully NFC patch to make things reviewable.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73705
|
|
Summary:
Future patches will make use of TTI to perform cost-model-driven `SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansionHelper()`
This is a fully NFC patch to make things reviewable.
Reviewers: reames, mkazantsev, wmi, sanjoy
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, javed.absar, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73704
|
|
Summary:
This patch moves the getIndexExpressionsFromGEP function from polly
into ScalarEvolution so that both polly and DependenceAnalysis can
use it for the purpose of subscript delinearization when the array
sizes are not parametric.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, sebpop, fhahn, dmgreen, grosser, etiotto, bollu
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, Whitney, ppc-slack, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73995
|
|
Added two flags to omit uncommon or dead paths in the CFG graphs:
-cfg-hide-unreachable-paths
-cfg-hide-deoptimize-paths
The main purpose is performance analysis when such block are not
"interesting" from perspective of common path performance.
Reviewed By: apilipenko, davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74346
|
|
is broken in presence of TBAA (PR42733).
Summary:
There is a flaw in memory dependence analysis caching mechanism when memory accesses with TBAA are involved. Assume we first analysed and cached results for access with TBAA. Later we request dependence for the same memory but without TBAA (or different TBAA). By design these two queries should share one entry in the internal cache which corresponds to a general access (without TBAA). Thus upon second request internal cached is cleared and we continue analysis for access as if there is no TBAA.
The problem is that even though internal cache is cleared the set of visited nodes is not. That means we won't traverse visited nodes again and populate internal cache with the corresponding dependence results. So we end up with internal cache in an incomplete state. Current implementation tries to signal that situation by resetting CacheInfo->Pair at line 1104. But that doesn't actually help since later code ignores this invalidation and relies on 'Cache->empty()' property to decide on cache completeness.
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel, chandlerc, fedor.sergeev, asbirlea, fhahn, john.brawn, Prazek, sunfish
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: DaniilSuchkov, kosarev, jfb, dantrushin, hiraditya, bmahjour, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73032
|
|
Summary:
As mentioned in D71974, it is useful for must-be-executed-context to explore CFG backwardly.
This patch is ported from parts of D64975. We use a dominator tree to find the previous context if
a dominator tree is available.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, hfinkel, baziotis, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74817
|
|
Summary:
This is the last functional patch affecting the representation of DDG.
Here we try to simplify the DDG to reduce the number of nodes and edges by
iteratively merging pairs of nodes that satisfy the following conditions,
until no such pair can be identified. A pair of nodes consisting of a and b
can be merged if:
1. the only edge from a is a def-use edge to b and
2. the only edge to b is a def-use edge from a and
3. there is no cyclic edge from b to a and
4. all instructions in a and b belong to the same basic block and
5. both a and b are simple (single or multi instruction) nodes.
These criteria allow us to fold many uninteresting def-use edges that
commonly exist in the graph while avoiding the risk of introducing
dependencies that didn't exist before.
Authored By: bmahjour
Reviewer: Meinersbur, fhahn, myhsu, xtian, dmgreen, kbarton, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: ychen, arphaman, simoll, a.elovikov, mgorny, hiraditya, jfb, wuzish, llvm-commits, jsji, Whitney, etiotto, ppc-slack
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72350
|
|
isKnownNonNaN() could not recognize a zero splat because that is a
ConstantAggregateZero which is-a ConstantData but not a ConstantDataVector.
Patch makes a ConstantAggregateZero return true.
Review: Thomas Lively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74263
|
|
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74835
|
|
After having committed https://reviews.llvm.org/D72226, 2 buildbots
running GCC 5.4.0 began failing. The cause was the order in which those
compilers evaluated the left- and right-hand sides of the expression
`RC.SCCIndices[C] = RC.SCCIndices.size();`. This commit splits the
expression into multiple statements to avoid ambiguity, and adds a test
case that exercises the code that caused the test failures on those
older compilers (which was originally included in the reviewed patch,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72226).
|
|
Essentially, fold OrderedBasicBlock into BasicBlock, and make it
auto-invalidate the instruction ordering when new instructions are
added. Notably, we don't need to invalidate it when removing
instructions, which is helpful when a pass mostly delete dead
instructions rather than transforming them.
The downside is that Instruction grows from 56 bytes to 64 bytes. The
resulting LLVM code is substantially simpler and automatically handles
invalidation, which makes me think that this is the right speed and size
tradeoff.
The important change is in SymbolTableTraitsImpl.h, where the numbering
is invalidated. Everything else should be straightforward.
We probably want to implement a fancier re-numbering scheme so that
local updates don't invalidate the ordering, but I plan for that to be
future work, maybe for someone else.
Reviewed By: lattner, vsk, fhahn, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51664
|
|
|
