| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Constant hoisting may have hidden a constant behind a bitcast so that
it isn't folded into its users. However, this prevents BPI from
calculating some of its heuristics that are based upon constant
values. So, I've added a simple helper function to look through these
casts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58166
llvm-svn: 354119
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
by `getTerminator()` calls instead be declared as `Instruction`.
This is the biggest remaining chunk of the usage of `getTerminator()`
that insists on the narrow type and so is an easy batch of updates.
Several files saw more extensive updates where this would cascade to
requiring API updates within the file to use `Instruction` instead of
`TerminatorInst`. All of these were trivial in nature (pervasively using
`Instruction` instead just worked).
llvm-svn: 344502
|
|
vector is sufficient here. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 334865
|
|
Currently the loop branch heuristic is applied before the invoke heuristic which makes us overestimate the probability of the unwind destination of invokes inside loops. This in turn makes us grossly underestimate the frequencies of loops with invokes.
Reviewed By: skatkov, vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47371
llvm-svn: 334285
|
|
Summary:
Require DominatorTree when requiring/preserving LoopInfo in the old pass manager
BreakCriticalEdges tries to keep LoopInfo and DominatorTree updated if they
exist. However, since commit r321653 and r321805, to update LoopInfo we
must have a DominatorTree, or we will hit an assert.
To fix this we now make a couple of passes that only required/preserved
LoopInfo also require DominatorTree.
This solves PR37334.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46829
llvm-svn: 332583
|
|
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
|
|
This commit adds a wrapper for std::distance() which works with ranges.
As it would be a common case to write `distance(predecessors(BB))`, this
also introduces `pred_size()` and `succ_size()` helpers to make that
easier to write.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46668
llvm-svn: 332057
|
|
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
|
|
Patch by Reshabh Sharma!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43939
llvm-svn: 326601
|
|
If we have a loop like this:
int n = 0;
while (...) {
if (++n >= MAX) {
n = 0;
}
}
then the body of the 'if' statement will only be executed once every MAX
iterations. Detect this by looking for branches in loops where taking the branch
makes the branch condition evaluate to 'not taken' in the next iteration of the
loop, and reduce the probability of such branches.
This slightly improves EEMBC benchmarks on cortex-m4/cortex-m33 due to making
better choices in if-conversion, but has no effect on any other cpu/benchmark
that I could detect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35804
llvm-svn: 325925
|
|
Summary:
Compute the strongly connected components of the CFG and fall back to
use these for blocks that are in loops that are not detected by
LoopInfo when computing loop back-edge and exit branch probabilities.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, davidxl
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39385
llvm-svn: 317094
|
|
Summary:
Add options -print-bfi/-print-bpi that dump block frequency and branch
probability info like -view-block-freq-propagation-dags and
-view-machine-block-freq-propagation-dags do but in text.
This is useful when the graph is very large and complex (the dot command
crashes, lines/edges too close to tell apart, hard to navigate without textual
search) or simply when text is preferred.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37165
llvm-svn: 311822
|
|
Current PGO only annotates the edge weight for branch and switch instructions
with profile counts. We should also annotate the indirectbr instruction as
all the information is there. This patch enables the annotating for indirectbr
instructions. Also uses this annotation in branch probability analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37074
llvm-svn: 311604
|
|
Constant::getUniqueInteger in a few places where we obviously have a ConstantInt. NFC
getUniqueInteger will ultimately call ConstantInt::getValue, but calling ConstantInt::getValue should be inlined.
llvm-svn: 310069
|
|
other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 308787
|
|
isZero/isOne/isMinusOne instead of isNullValue/isOneValue/isAllOnesValue inherited from Constant. NFCI
Going through the Constant methods requires redetermining that the Constant is a ConstantInt and then calling isZero/isOne/isMinusOne.
llvm-svn: 307292
|
|
The zero heuristic assumes that integers are more likely positive than negative,
but this also has the effect of assuming that strcmp return values are more
likely positive than negative. Given that for nonzero strcmp return values it's
the ordering of arguments that determines the sign of the result there's no
reason to assume that's true.
Fix this by inspecting the LHS of the compare and using TargetLibraryInfo to
decide if it's strcmp-like, and if so only assume that nonzero is more likely
than zero i.e. strings are more often different than the same. This causes a
slight code generation change in the spec2006 benchmark 403.gcc, but with no
noticeable performance impact. The intent of this patch is to allow better
optimisation of dhrystone on Cortex-M cpus, but currently it won't as there are
also some changes that need to be made to if-conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33934
llvm-svn: 304970
|
|
The probability of edge coming to unreachable block should be as low as possible.
The change reduces the probability to minimal value greater than zero.
The bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32214 show the example when
the probability of edge coming to unreachable block is greater than for edge
coming to out of the loop and it causes incorrect loop rotation.
Please note that with this change the behavior of unreachable heuristic is a bit different
than others. Specifically, before this change the sum of probabilities
coming to unreachable blocks have the same weight for all branches
(it was just split over all edges of this block coming to unreachable blocks).
With this change it might be slightly different but not to much due to probability of
taken branch to unreachable block is really small.
Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, vsk, congh, junbuml, davidxl, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: chandlerc, dexonsmith
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30633
llvm-svn: 303327
|
|
unreachanble
This is a follow up patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300440
to address a comment.
To make implementation to be consistent with other cases we just
ignore the remainder after distribution of remaining probability between
reachable edges.
If we reduced the probability of some edges coming to unreachable
blocks we should distribute the remaining part across other edges
coming to reachable blocks to satisfy the condition that sum of all
probabilities should be equal to one. If this remaining part is not
divided by number of "reachable" edges then we get this remainder.
This remainder probability should be pretty small. Other cases just ignore
if the sum of probabilities is not equal to one so we do the same.
Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, vsk, junbuml, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32124
llvm-svn: 302883
|
|
This is non-functional change to re-order if statements to bail out earlier
from unreachable and ColdCall heuristics.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, junbuml, vsk, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31704
llvm-svn: 300442
|
|
Metadata potentially is more precise than any heuristics we use, so
it makes sense to use first metadata info if it is available. However it makes
sense to examine it against other strong heuristics like unreachable one.
If edge coming to unreachable block has higher probability then it is expected
by unreachable heuristic then we use heuristic and remaining probability is
distributed among other reachable blocks equally.
An example where metadata might be more strong then unreachable heuristic is
as follows: it is possible that there are two branches and for the branch A
metadata says that its probability is (0, 2^25). For the branch B
the probability is (1, 2^25).
So the expectation is that first edge of B is hotter than first edge of A
because first edge of A did not executed at least once.
If first edge of A points to the unreachable block then using the unreachable
heuristics we'll set the probability for A to (1, 2^20) and now edge of A
becomes hotter than edge of B.
This is unexpected behavior.
This fixed the biggest part of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32214
Reviewers: sanjoy, junbuml, vsk, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, reames, davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30631
llvm-svn: 300440
|
|
Collection of PostDominatedByUnreachable and PostDominatedByColdCall have been
split out of heuristics itself. Update of the data happens now for each basic
block (before update for PostDominatedByColdCall might be skipped if
unreachable or matadata heuristic handled this basic block).
This separation allows re-ordering of heuristics without loosing
the post-domination information.
Reviewers: sanjoy, junbuml, vsk, chandlerc, reames
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31701
llvm-svn: 300029
|
|
BPI may trigger signed overflow UB while computing branch probabilities for
cold calls or to unreachables. For example, with our current choice of weights,
we'll crash if there are >= 2^12 branches to an unreachable.
Use a safer BranchProbability constructor which is better at handling fractions
with large denominators.
Changes since the initial commit:
- Use explicit casts to ensure that multiplication operands are 64-bit
ints.
rdar://problem/29368161
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27862
llvm-svn: 290022
|
|
This reverts commit r290016. It breaks this bot, even though the test
passes locally:
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/builds/32956/
AnalysisTests: /home/bb/ninja-x64-msvc-RA-centos6/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/BranchProbability.cpp:52: static llvm::BranchProbability llvm::BranchProbability::getBranchProbability(uint64_t, uint64_t): Assertion `Numerator <= Denominator && "Probability cannot be bigger than 1!"' failed.
llvm-svn: 290019
|
|
BPI may trigger signed overflow UB while computing branch probabilities
for cold calls or to unreachables. For example, with our current choice
of weights, we'll crash if there are >= 2^12 branches to an unreachable.
Use a safer BranchProbability constructor which is better at handling
fractions with large denominators.
rdar://problem/29368161
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27862
llvm-svn: 290016
|
|
analyses to have a common type which is enforced rather than using
a char object and a `void *` type when used as an identifier.
This has a number of advantages. First, it at least helps some of the
confusion raised in Justin Lebar's code review of why `void *` was being
used everywhere by having a stronger type that connects to documentation
about this.
However, perhaps more importantly, it addresses a serious issue where
the alignment of these pointer-like identifiers was unknown. This made
it hard to use them in pointer-like data structures. We were already
dodging this in dangerous ways to create the "all analyses" entry. In
a subsequent patch I attempted to use these with TinyPtrVector and
things fell apart in a very bad way.
And it isn't just a compile time or type system issue. Worse than that,
the actual alignment of these pointer-like opaque identifiers wasn't
guaranteed to be a useful alignment as they were just characters.
This change introduces a type to use as the "key" object whose address
forms the opaque identifier. This both forces the objects to have proper
alignment, and provides type checking that we get it right everywhere.
It also makes the types somewhat less mysterious than `void *`.
We could go one step further and introduce a truly opaque pointer-like
type to return from the `ID()` static function rather than returning
`AnalysisKey *`, but that didn't seem to be a clear win so this is just
the initial change to get to a reliably typed and aligned object serving
is a key for all the analyses.
Thanks to Richard Smith and Justin Lebar for helping pick plausible
names and avoid making this refactoring many times. =] And thanks to
Sean for the super fast review!
While here, I've tried to move away from the "PassID" nomenclature
entirely as it wasn't really helping and is overloaded with old pass
manager constructs. Now we have IDs for analyses, and key objects whose
address can be used as IDs. Where possible and clear I've shortened this
to just "ID". In a few places I kept "AnalysisID" to make it clear what
was being identified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27031
llvm-svn: 287783
|
|
Summary: When identifying cold blocks, consider only the edge to the normal destination if the terminator is InvokeInst and let calcInvokeHeuristics() decide edge weights for the InvokeInst.
Reviewers: mcrosier, hfinkel, davidxl
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24868
llvm-svn: 282262
|
|
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 278077
|
|
Most possibly problem was caused by the same reason as PR28400. This change
bypasses it by using CallbackVH instead of AssertingVH.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20957
llvm-svn: 275563
|
|
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272999
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo"
It was causing failures in Profile-i386 and Profile-x86_64 tests.
llvm-svn: 272912
|
|
We should update results of the BranchProbabilityInfo after removing block in JumpThreading. Otherwise
we will get dangling pointer inside BranchProbabilityInfo cache.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20957
llvm-svn: 272891
|
|
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19839
llvm-svn: 268601
|
|
Summary:
Calls to @llvm.experimental.deoptimize are expected to "never execute",
so optimize them as such.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: junbuml, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19095
llvm-svn: 266654
|
|
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 265731
|
|
r256263.
llvm-svn: 256303
|
|
This patch removes all weight-related interfaces from BPI and replace
them by probability versions. With this patch, we won't use edge weight
anymore in either IR or MC passes. Edge probabilitiy is a better
representation in terms of CFG update and validation.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15519
llvm-svn: 256263
|
|
This is recommit of r256028 with minor fixes in unittests:
CodeGen/Mips/eh.ll
CodeGen/Mips/insn-zero-size-bb.ll
Original commit message:
When identifying blocks post-dominated by an unreachable-terminated block
in BranchProbabilityInfo, consider only the edge to the normal destination
block if the terminator is InvokeInst and let calcInvokeHeuristics() decide
edge weights for the InvokeInst.
llvm-svn: 256202
|
|
This reverts commit r256028.
It broke:
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/eh.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/insn-zero-size-bb.ll
llvm-svn: 256032
|
|
When identifying blocks post-dominated by an unreachable-terminated block
in BranchProbabilityInfo, consider only the edge to the normal destination
block if the terminator is InvokeInst and let calcInvokeHeuristics() decide
edge weights for the InvokeInst.
llvm-svn: 256028
|
|
interfaces, and update all uses of old interfaces.
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
|
|
probability-based interfaces, and update all uses of old interfaces."
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
|
|
interfaces, and update all uses of old interfaces.
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
|
|
getting edge probabilities in BPI and return 100% in this case.
This issue is triggered in PGO mode when bootstrapping LLVM. It seems that it is not guaranteed that edge weights are always greater than zero which are read from profile data.
llvm-svn: 251317
|
|
Remove implicit ilist iterator conversions from LLVMAnalysis.
I came across something really scary in `llvm::isKnownNotFullPoison()`
which relied on `Instruction::getNextNode()` being completely broken
(not surprising, but scary nevertheless). This function is documented
(and coded to) return `nullptr` when it gets to the sentinel, but with
an `ilist_half_node` as a sentinel, the sentinel check looks into some
other memory and we don't recognize we've hit the end.
Rooting out these scary cases is the reason I'm removing the implicit
conversions before doing anything else with `ilist`; I'm not at all
surprised that clients rely on badness.
I found another scary case -- this time, not relying on badness, just
bad (but I guess getting lucky so far) -- in
`ObjectSizeOffsetEvaluator::compute_()`. Here, we save out the
insertion point, do some things, and then restore it. Previously, we
let the iterator auto-convert to `Instruction*`, and then set it back
using the `Instruction*` version:
Instruction *PrevInsertPoint = Builder.GetInsertPoint();
/* Logic that may change insert point */
if (PrevInsertPoint)
Builder.SetInsertPoint(PrevInsertPoint);
The check for `PrevInsertPoint` doesn't protect correctly against bad
accesses. If the insertion point has been set to the end of a basic
block (i.e., `SetInsertPoint(SomeBB)`), then `GetInsertPoint()` returns
an iterator pointing at the list sentinel. The version of
`SetInsertPoint()` that's getting called will then call
`PrevInsertPoint->getParent()`, which explodes horribly. The only
reason this hasn't blown up is that it's fairly unlikely the builder is
adding to the end of the block; usually, we're adding instructions
somewhere before the terminator.
llvm-svn: 249925
|
|
This new wrapper pass is useful when we want to do branch probability analysis conditionally (e.g. only in PGO mode) but don't want to add one more pass dependence.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11241
llvm-svn: 242349
|
|
BranchProbabilityInfo was leaking 3MB of memory when running 'opt -O2 verify-uselistorder.lto.bc'. This was due to the Weights member not being cleared once the pass is no longer needed.
This adds the releaseMemory override to clear that field. The other fields are cleared at the end of runOnFunction so can stay there.
llvm-svn: 238462
|
|
Summary:
This addresses PR 22718. When branch weights are too large, they were
being clamped to the range [1, MaxWeightForBB]. But this clamping is
only applied to edges that go outside the range, so it distorts the
relative branch probabilities.
This patch changes the weight calculation to scale every branch so the
relative probabilities are preserved. The scaling is done differently
now. First, all the branch weights are added up, and if the sum exceeds
32 bits, it computes an integer scale to bring all the weights within
the range.
The patch fixes an existing test that had slightly wrong branch
probabilities due to the previous clamping. It now gets branch weights
scaled accordingly.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9442
llvm-svn: 236750
|
|
Summary:
When computing branch weights in BPI, we used to disallow branches with
weight 0. This is a minor nuisance, because a branch with weight 0 is
different to "don't have information". In the context of
instrumentation, it may mean "never executed", in the context of
sampling, it means "never or seldom executed".
In allowing 0 weight branches, I ran into issues with the switch
expansion code in selection DAG. It is currently hardwired to not handle
branches with weight 0. To maintain the current behaviour, I changed it
to use 1 when it finds 0, but perhaps the algorithm needs changes to
tolerate branches with weight zero.
Reviewers: hansw
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9533
llvm-svn: 236617
|
