| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Return references from GetDummyTarget and GetSelectedOrDummyTarget. This
matches how the APIs are already used in practice.
|
|
Color the error: and warning: part of the CommandReturnObject output,
similar to how an error is printed from the driver when colors are
enabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81058
|
|
Summary:
Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the
currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement,
fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or
abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are
not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new
Fix-It.
This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes
and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still
give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to
fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to
give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression
error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated).
The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how
often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone
so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions.
Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: shafik, abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214
|
|
expressions
Summary:
LLDB keeps statistics of how many expression evaluations are 'successful' and 'failed'
which are updated after each expression evaluation (assuming statistics are enabled).
From what I understand the idea is that this could be used to define how well LLDB's
expression evaluator is working.
Currently all expressions are considered successful unless the user passes an explicit
positive element counting to the expression command (with the `-Z` flag) and then passes
an expression that successfully evaluates to a type that doesn't support element counting.
Expressions that fail to parse, execute or any other outcome are considered successful
at the moment which means we nearly always have a 100% expression evaluation
success rate.
This patch makes that expressions that fail to parse or execute to count as failed
expressions.
We can't know whether the expression failed because of an user error
of because LLDB couldn't correctly parse/compile it, but I would argue that this is
still an improvement. Assuming that the percentage of valid user expressions stays
mostly constant over time (which seems like a reasonable assumption), then this
way we can still see if we are doing relatively better/worse from release to release.
Reviewers: davide, aprantl, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76280
|
|
The error_stream and result parameter were inconsistently checked for
being null, so we might as well make them references instead of crashing
in case someone passes a nullptr and hits one of the code paths that are
currently not doing a nullptr check on those parameters. Also change
output_stream for consistency.
|
|
|
|
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
|
|
The GetRawLine currently returns the full command line used
to create the CompletionRequest. So for example for "foo b[tab] --arg"
it would return the whole string instead of "foo b". Usually
completion code makes the wrong assumption that the cursor is at
the end of the line and handing out the complete line will cause
that people implement completions that also make this assumption.
This patch makes GetRawLine() return only the string until the
cursor and hides the suffix (so that the cursor is always at the
end of this string) and adds another function GetRawLineWithUnusedSuffix
that is specifically the line with the suffix that isn't used by
the CompletionRequest for argument parsing etc.
There is only one user of this new function that actually needs the
suffix and that is the expression command which needs the suffix to
detect if it is in the raw or argument part of the command (by looking
at the "--" separator).
|
|
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
|
|
Make it clear form the method names whether they are synchronous or
asynchronous.
|
|
Summary: This removes most of unnecessary includes in the `source/Commands` directory. This was generated by IWYU and a script that fixed all the bogus reports from IWYU. Patch is tested on Linux and macOS.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: krytarowski, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71489
|
|
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70002
|
|
These files had a lot of whitespace errors in them which was a
constant source of merge conflicts downstream.
|
|
Summary:
This patch removes File::SetStream() and File::SetDescriptor(),
and replaces most direct uses of File with pointers to File.
Instead of calling SetStream() on a file, we make a new file and
replace it.
My ultimate goal here is to introduce a new API class SBFile, which
has full support for python io.IOStream file objects. These can
redirect read() and write() to python code, so lldb::Files will
need a way to dispatch those methods. Additionally it will need some
form of sharing and assigning files, as a SBFile will be passed in and
assigned to the main IO streams of the debugger.
In my prototype patch queue, I make File itself copyable and add a
secondary class FileOps to manage the sharing and dispatch. In that
case SBFile was a unique_ptr<File>.
(here: https://github.com/smoofra/llvm-project/tree/files)
However in review, Pavel Labath suggested that it be shared_ptr instead.
(here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67793)
In order for SBFile to use shared_ptr<File>, everything else should
as well.
If this patch is accepted, I will make SBFile use a shared_ptr
I will remove FileOps from future patches and use subclasses of File
instead.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jasonmolenda, zturner, jingham, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67891
llvm-svn: 373090
|
|
llvm-svn: 370019
|
|
target
Summary:
We always have a dummy target, so any error handling regarding a missing dummy target is dead code now.
Also makes the CommandObject methods that return Target& to express this fact in the API.
This patch just for the CommandObject part of LLDB. I'll migrate the rest of LLDB in a follow-up patch that's WIP.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66737
llvm-svn: 369939
|
|
Summary:
We currently have a bunch of code that is supposed to handle invalid command options, but
all this code is unreachable because invalid options are already handled in `Options::Parse`.
The only way we can reach this code is when we declare but then not implement an option
(which will be made impossible with D65386, which is also when we can completely remove
the `default` cases).
This patch replaces all this code with `llvm_unreachable` to make clear this is dead code
that can't be reached.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66522
llvm-svn: 369625
|
|
remove any undocumented/redundant return values
Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:
* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.
I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.
A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:
* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.
Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
(even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).
* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
0-based like Xcode has to do).
* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
`WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).
This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.
For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).
I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536
llvm-svn: 369624
|
|
Reformat OptionEnumValueElement to make it easier to distinguish between
its fields. This also removes the need to disable clang-format for these
arrays.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65489
llvm-svn: 367638
|
|
Summary:
Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but
not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays,
we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers.
This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in
the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our
handling code less prone).
This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331
llvm-svn: 367186
|
|
llvm-svn: 367009
|
|
llvm-svn: 362339
|
|
In r359354 a GetDebugger() method was added to the CommandObject class,
so that we didn't have to go through the command interpreter to obtain
the script interpreter. This patch simplifies other call sites where
m_interpreter.GetDebugger() was used, and replaces them with a shorter
call to the new method.
llvm-svn: 359373
|
|
Inspired by Zachary's mail on lldb-dev, this seemed like low hanging
fruit. This patch breaks the circular dependency between commands and
expression.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59158
llvm-svn: 355762
|
|
This patch adds the necessary logic to capture and replay commands
entered into the command interpreter. A DataRecorder shadows the input
and writes its data to a know file. During replay this file is used as
the command interpreter's input.
It's possible to the command interpreter more than once, with a
different input source. We support this scenario by using multiple
buffers. The synchronization for this takes place at the SB layer, where
we create a new recorder every time the debugger input is changed.
During replay we use the corresponding buffer as input.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58564
llvm-svn: 355249
|
|
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
|
|
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
|
|
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
|
|
result"
This reverts commit r344647.
This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly
introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in:
lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350
lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529
(maybe there could be more)
As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are
correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the
author to resolve.
llvm-svn: 344722
|
|
Before we returned an error that was not exposed in the SB API and no useful
error message. This change returns eExpressionProducedNoResult and an
appropriate error string.
<rdar://problem/44539514>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53309
llvm-svn: 344647
|
|
llvm::ArrayRef
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49017
llvm-svn: 343130
|
|
The patch was originally written before we had a CompletionRequest,
so it still used a StringList to pass back the completions to
the request.
llvm-svn: 341124
|
|
Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.
We now have a completion handler in the expression CommandObject that
essentially just attempts to parse the given user expression with Clang with
an attached code completion consumer. We filter and prepare the
code completions provided by Clang and send them back to the completion
API.
The current completion is limited to variables that are in the current scope.
This includes local variables and all types used by local variables. We however
don't do any completion of symbols that are not used in the local scope (or
in some other way already in the ASTContext).
This is partly because there is not yet any code that manually searches for additiona
information in the debug information. Another cause is that for some reason the existing
code for loading these additional symbols when requested by Clang doesn't seem to work.
This will be fixed in a future patch.
Reviewers: jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, aprantl, JDevlieghere, friss, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48465
llvm-svn: 341086
|
|
Summary:
This patch gets rid of the C-string parameter in the RawCommandObject::DoExecute function,
making the code simpler and less memory unsafe.
There seems to be a assumption in some command objects that this parameter could be a nullptr,
but from what I can see the rest of the API doesn't actually allow this (and other command
objects and related code pieces dereference this parameter without any checks).
Especially CommandObjectRegexCommand has error handling code for a nullptr that is now gone.
Reviewers: davide, jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49207
llvm-svn: 336955
|
|
Summary:
A subset of the LLDB commands follows this command line interface style:
<command name> [arguments] -- <string suffix>
The parsing code for this interface has been so far been duplicated into the different
command objects which makes it hard to maintain and reuse elsewhere.
This patches improves the situation by adding a OptionsWithRaw class that centralizes
the parsing logic and allows easier testing. The different commands now just call this class to
extract the arguments and the raw suffix from the provided user input.
Reviewers: jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49106
llvm-svn: 336723
|
|
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
|
|
Pointed out by Jim.
llvm-svn: 330047
|
|
This allows us to collect useful metrics about lldb debugging sessions.
I thought that an example would be better than a thousand words:
Process 19705 stopped
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = step in
frame #0: 0x0000000100000fb4 blah`main at blah.c:3
1 int main(void) {
2 int a = 6;
-> 3 return 0;
4 }
(lldb) statistics enable
(lldb) frame var a
(int) a = 6
(lldb) expr a
(int) $1 = 6
(lldb) statistics disable
(lldb) statistics dump
Number of expr evaluation successes : 1
Number of expr evaluation failures : 0
Number of frame var successes : 1
Number of frame var failures : 0
Future improvements might include:
1. Passing a file, or implementing categories. The way this patch has
been implemented is generic enough to allow this to be extended
easily without breaking the grammar.
2. Adding an SBAPI and Python API for use in scripts.
Thanks to Jim Ingham for discussing the design with me.
<rdar://problem/36555975>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45547
llvm-svn: 330043
|
|
Summary:
The idea behind this is to move the functionality which depend on other lldb
classes into a separate class. This way, the Args class can be turned
into a lightweight arc+argv wrapper and moved into the lower lldb
layers.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44306
llvm-svn: 329677
|
|
This seemed natural to us, but wasn't documented anywhere and was
not clear to everybody.
<rdar://problem/33316164>
llvm-svn: 308549
|
|
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
|
|
This breaks the cycle between Target and PluginLanguageC++, reducing
the overall cycle count from 43 to 42.
llvm-svn: 298561
|
|
llvm-svn: 288797
|
|
This would trigger an assertion at runtime otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26482
llvm-svn: 286562
|
|
This is forcing to use Error::success(), which is in a wide majority
of cases a lot more readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26481
llvm-svn: 286561
|
|
In the expression command, if the target is NULL, you have to use the dummy
target.
<rdar://problem/28811687>
llvm-svn: 284439
|
|
llvm-svn: 283904
|
|
llvm-svn: 283384
|
|
to 'po' without an argument after the StringRef refactoring
Fixes rdar://28480275
llvm-svn: 282445
|
