| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
clause
Passing any feature in the device-isa trait which is not supported by the host
was causing a compilation failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116549
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116764
|
|
Identified with bugprone-argument-comment.
|
|
|
|
Implementation is based on the "expected type" as used for
designated-initializers in braced init lists. This means it can deduce the type
in some cases where it's not written:
void foo(Widget);
foo({ /*help here*/ });
Only basic constructor calls are in scope of this patch, excluded are:
- aggregate initialization (no help is offered for aggregates)
- initializer_list initialization (no help is offered for these constructors)
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/306
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116317
|
|
|
|
This patch adds the support for `atomic compare` in parser. The support
in Sema and CodeGen will come soon. For now, it simply eimits an error when it
is encountered.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115561
|
|
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for 'align' clause for use with
'allocate' directive.
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113154
|
|
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the #pragma omp loop
directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112499
|
|
Adds initial parsing and sema for the 'append_args' clause.
Note that an AST clause is not created as it instead adds its values
to the OMPDeclareVariantAttr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111854
|
|
Adds initial parsing and sema for the 'adjust_args' clause.
Note that an AST clause is not created as it instead adds its expressions
to the OMPDeclareVariantAttr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99905
|
|
This patch supports OpenMP 5.0 metadirective features.
It is implemented keeping the OpenMP 5.1 features like dynamic user condition in mind.
A new function, getBestWhenMatchForContext, is defined in llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.h
Currently this function return the index of the when clause with the highest score from the ones applicable in the Context.
But this function is declared with an array which can be used in OpenMP 5.1 implementation to select all the valid when clauses which can be resolved in runtime. Currently this array is set to null by default and its implementation is left for future.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944
|
|
This reverts commit c7d7b98e5263472f05b2f3cb767b5d16e1349e9a.
Breaks tests on macOS, see comment on https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944
|
|
This patch supports OpenMP 5.0 metadirective features.
It is implemented keeping the OpenMP 5.1 features like dynamic user condition in mind.
A new function, getBestWhenMatchForContext, is defined in llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.h
Currently this function return the index of the when clause with the highest score from the ones applicable in the Context.
But this function is declared with an array which can be used in OpenMP 5.1 implementation to select all the valid when clauses which can be resolved in runtime. Currently this array is set to null by default and its implementation is left for future.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944
|
|
This reverts commit c7d7b98e5263472f05b2f3cb767b5d16e1349e9a.
|
|
This patch supports OpenMP 5.0 metadirective features.
It is implemented keeping the OpenMP 5.1 features like dynamic user condition in mind.
A new function, getBestWhenMatchForContext, is defined in llvm/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.h
Currently this function return the index of the when clause with the highest score from the ones applicable in the Context.
But this function is declared with an array which can be used in OpenMP 5.1 implementation to select all the valid when clauses which can be resolved in runtime. Currently this array is set to null by default and its implementation is left for future.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91944
|
|
This patch supports construct trait set selector by using the existed
declare variant infrastructure inside `OMPContext` and simd selector is
currently not supported. The goal of this patch is to pass the declare variant
test inside sollve test suite.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109635
|
|
Since these assumptions are coming from OpenMP it makes sense to mark
them as such in the generic IR encoding. Standardized assumptions will
be named
omp_ASSUMPTION_NAME
and extensions will be named
ompx_ASSUMPTION_NAME
which is the OpenMP 5.2 syntax for "extensions" of any kind.
This also matches what the OpenMP-Opt pass expects.
Summarized,
#pragma omp [...] assume[s] no_parallelism
now generates the same IR assumption annotation as
__attribute__((assume("omp_no_parallelism")))
Reviewed By: jhuber6
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105937
|
|
Recommit of 707ce34b06190e275572c3c46843036db1bab6d1. Don't introduce a
dependency to the LLVMPasses component, instead register the required
passes individually.
Add methods for loop unrolling to the OpenMPIRBuilder class and use them in Clang if `-fopenmp-enable-irbuilder` is enabled. The unrolling methods are:
* `unrollLoopFull`
* `unrollLoopPartial`
* `unrollLoopHeuristic`
`unrollLoopPartial` and `unrollLoopHeuristic` can use compiler heuristics to automatically determine the unroll factor. If possible, that is if no CanonicalLoopInfo is required to pass to another method, metadata for LLVM's LoopUnrollPass is added. Otherwise the unroll factor is determined using the same heurstics as user by LoopUnrollPass. Not requiring a CanonicalLoopInfo, especially with `unrollLoopHeuristic` allows greater flexibility.
With full unrolling and partial unrolling with known unroll factor, instead of duplicating instructions by the OpenMPIRBuilder, the full unroll is still delegated to the LoopUnrollPass. In case of partial unrolling the loop is first tiled using the existing `tileLoops` methods, then the inner loop fully unrolled using the same mechanism.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107764
|
|
Breaks build with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
```
CMake Error: The inter-target dependency graph contains the following strongly connected component (cycle):
"LLVMFrontendOpenMP" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMPasses" (weak)
"LLVMipo" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMFrontendOpenMP" (weak)
"LLVMCoroutines" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMipo" (weak)
"LLVMPasses" of type SHARED_LIBRARY
depends on "LLVMCoroutines" (weak)
depends on "LLVMipo" (weak)
At least one of these targets is not a STATIC_LIBRARY. Cyclic dependencies are allowed only among static libraries.
CMake Generate step failed. Build files cannot be regenerated correctly.
```
This reverts commit 707ce34b06190e275572c3c46843036db1bab6d1.
|
|
Add methods for loop unrolling to the OpenMPIRBuilder class and use them in Clang if `-fopenmp-enable-irbuilder` is enabled. The unrolling methods are:
* `unrollLoopFull`
* `unrollLoopPartial`
* `unrollLoopHeuristic`
`unrollLoopPartial` and `unrollLoopHeuristic` can use compiler heuristics to automatically determine the unroll factor. If possible, that is if no CanonicalLoopInfo is required to pass to another method, metadata for LLVM's LoopUnrollPass is added. Otherwise the unroll factor is determined using the same heurstics as user by LoopUnrollPass. Not requiring a CanonicalLoopInfo, especially with `unrollLoopHeuristic` allows greater flexibility.
With full unrolling and partial unrolling with known unroll factor, instead of duplicating instructions by the OpenMPIRBuilder, the full unroll is still delegated to the LoopUnrollPass. In case of partial unrolling the loop is first tiled using the existing `tileLoops` methods, then the inner loop fully unrolled using the same mechanism.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107764
|
|
(1/2)
This patch implements Clang support for an original OpenMP extension
we have developed to support OpenACC: the `ompx_hold` map type
modifier. The next patch in this series, D106510, implements OpenMP
runtime support.
Consider the following example:
```
#pragma omp target data map(ompx_hold, tofrom: x) // holds onto mapping of x
{
foo(); // might have map(delete: x)
#pragma omp target map(present, alloc: x) // x is guaranteed to be present
printf("%d\n", x);
}
```
The `ompx_hold` map type modifier above specifies that the `target
data` directive holds onto the mapping for `x` throughout the
associated region regardless of any `target exit data` directives
executed during the call to `foo`. Thus, the presence assertion for
`x` at the enclosed `target` construct cannot fail. (As usual, the
standard OpenMP reference count for `x` must also reach zero before
the data is unmapped.)
Justification for inclusion in Clang and LLVM's OpenMP runtime:
* The `ompx_hold` modifier supports OpenACC functionality (structured
reference count) that cannot be achieved in standard OpenMP, as of
5.1.
* The runtime implementation for `ompx_hold` (next patch) will thus be
used by Flang's OpenACC support.
* The Clang implementation for `ompx_hold` (this patch) as well as the
runtime implementation are required for the Clang OpenACC support
being developed as part of the ECP Clacc project, which translates
OpenACC to OpenMP at the directive AST level. These patches are the
first step in upstreaming OpenACC functionality from Clacc.
* The Clang implementation for `ompx_hold` is also used by the tests
in the runtime implementation. That syntactic support makes the
tests more readable than low-level runtime calls can. Moreover,
upstream Flang and Clang do not yet support OpenACC syntax
sufficiently for writing the tests.
* More generally, the Clang implementation enables a clean separation
of concerns between OpenACC and OpenMP development in LLVM. That
is, LLVM's OpenMP developers can discuss, modify, and debug LLVM's
extended OpenMP implementation and test suite without directly
considering OpenACC's language and execution model, which can be
handled by LLVM's OpenACC developers.
* OpenMP users might find the `ompx_hold` modifier useful, as in the
above example.
See new documentation introduced by this patch in `openmp/docs` for
more detail on the functionality of this extension and its
relationship with OpenACC. For example, it explains how the runtime
must support two reference counts, as specified by OpenACC.
Clang recognizes `ompx_hold` unless `-fno-openmp-extensions`, a new
command-line option introduced by this patch, is specified.
Reviewed By: ABataev, jdoerfert, protze.joachim, grokos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106509
|
|
OpenMP 5.1 added support for writing OpenMP directives using [[]]
syntax in addition to using #pragma and this introduces support for the
new syntax.
In OpenMP, the attributes take one of two forms:
[[omp::directive(...)]] or [[omp::sequence(...)]]. A directive
attribute contains an OpenMP directive clause that is identical to the
analogous #pragma syntax. A sequence attribute can contain either
sequence or directive arguments and is used to ensure that the
attributes are processed sequentially for situations where the order of
the attributes matter (remember:
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr.grammar#4.sentence-4).
The approach taken here is somewhat novel and deserves mention. We
could refactor much of the OpenMP parsing logic to work for either
pragma annotation tokens or for attribute clauses. It would be a fair
amount of effort to share the logic for both, but it's certainly
doable. However, the semantic attribute system is not designed to
handle the arbitrarily complex arguments that OpenMP directives
contain. Adding support to thread the novel parsed information until we
can produce a semantic attribute would be considerably more effort.
What's more, existing OpenMP constructs are not (often) represented as
semantic attributes. So doing this through Attr.td would be a massive
undertaking that would likely only benefit OpenMP and comes with
additional risks. Rather than walk down that path, I am taking
advantage of the fact that the syntax of the directives within the
directive clause is identical to that of the #pragma form. Once the
parser recognizes that we're processing an OpenMP attribute, it caches
all of the directive argument tokens and then replays them as though
the user wrote a pragma. This reuses the same OpenMP parsing and
semantic logic directly, but does come with a risk if the OpenMP
committee decides to purposefully diverge their pragma and attribute
syntaxes. So, despite this being a novel approach that does token
replay, I think it's actually a better approach than trying to do this
through the declarative syntax in Attr.td.
|
|
directive
The parser code assumes building with C++ compiler and asserts when using clang (not clang++) on C file. I made the code dependent on input language. This shows up for amdgpu target.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103899
|
|
Implementation of the unroll directive introduced in OpenMP 5.1. Follows the approach from D76342 for the tile directive (i.e. AST-based, not using the OpenMPIRBuilder). Tries to use `llvm.loop.unroll.*` metadata where possible, but has to fall back to an AST representation of the outer loop if the partially unrolled generated loop is associated with another directive (because it needs to compute the number of iterations).
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99459
|
|
This patch fixes various issues with our prior `declare target` handling
and extends it to support `omp begin declare target` as well.
This started with PR49649 in mind, trying to provide a way for users to
avoid the "ref" global use introduced for globals with internal linkage.
From there it went down the rabbit hole, e.g., all variables, even
`nohost` ones, were emitted into the device code so it was impossible to
determine if "ref" was needed late in the game (based on the name only).
To make it really useful, `begin declare target` was needed as it can
carry the `device_type`. Not emitting variables eagerly had a ripple
effect. Finally, the precedence of the (explicit) declare target list
items needed to be taken into account, that meant we cannot just look
for any declare target attribute to make a decision. This caused the
handling of functions to require fixup as well.
I tried to clean up things while I was at it, e.g., we should not "parse
declarations and defintions" as part of OpenMP parsing, this will always
break at some point. Instead, we keep track what region we are in and
act on definitions and declarations instead, this is what we do for
declare variant and other begin/end directives already.
Highlights:
- new diagnosis for restrictions specificed in the standard,
- delayed emission of globals not mentioned in an explicit
list of a declare target,
- omission of `nohost` globals on the host and `host` globals on the
device,
- no explicit parsing of declarations in-between `omp [begin] declare
variant` and the corresponding end anymore, regular parsing instead,
- precedence for explicit mentions in `declare target` lists over
implicit mentions in the declaration-definition-seq, and
- `omp allocate` declarations will now replace an earlier emitted
global, if necessary.
---
Notes:
The patch is larger than I hoped but it turns out that most changes do
on their own lead to "inconsistent states", which seem less desirable
overall.
After working through this I feel the standard should remove the
explicit declare target forms as the delayed emission is horrible.
That said, while we delay things anyway, it seems to me we check too
often for the current status even though that is often not sufficient to
act upon. There seems to be a lot of duplication that can probably be
trimmed down. Eagerly emitting some things seems pretty weak as an
argument to keep so much logic around.
---
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101030
|
|
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the #pragma omp masked
directive.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99995
|
|
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the 'nocontext' clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99848
|
|
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the 'novariants' clause.
|
|
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for dispatch directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99537
|
|
The emty declare target/end declare target region should not cause an
error emission.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99288
|
|
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support to extend the
existing 'destroy' clause for use with the 'interop' directive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98834
|
|
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the 'use' clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98815
|
|
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for interop directive.
Support for the 'init' clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98558
|
|
Somewhat surprisingly, signature help is emitted as a side-effect of
computing the expected type of a function argument.
The reason is that both actions require enumerating the possible
function signatures and running partial overload resolution, and doing
this twice would be wasteful and complicated.
Change #1: document this, it's subtle :-)
However, sometimes we need to compute the expected type without having
reached the code completion cursor yet - in particular to allow
completion of designators.
eb4ab3358cd4dc834a761191b5531b38114f7b13 did this but introduced a
regression - it emits signature help in the wrong location as a side-effect.
Change #2: only emit signature help if the code completion cursor was reached.
Currently there is PP.isCodeCompletionReached(), but we can't use it
because it's set *after* running code completion.
It'd be nice to set this implicitly when the completion token is lexed,
but ConsumeCodeCompletionToken() makes this complicated.
Change #3: call cutOffParsing() *first* when seeing a completion token.
After this, the fact that the Sema::Produce*SignatureHelp() functions
are even more confusing, as they only sometimes do that.
I don't want to rename them in this patch as it's another large
mechanical change, but we should soon.
Change #4: prepare to rename ProduceSignatureHelp() to GuessArgumentType() etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98488
|
|
Two tests failed for some reason, need to investigate:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/109/builds/10399
This reverts commit ad9e98b8efa0138559eb640023695dab54967a8d.
|
|
selector trait"
Need to revert ad9e98b8efa0138559eb640023695dab54967a8d which this
commit depends on.
This reverts commit f771ef7b5f0ed260d00931cd50e6fe462edbacaf.
|
|
Nested `omp [begin|end] declare variant` inherit the selectors from
surrounding `omp (begin|end) declare variant` constructs. To stop such
propagation the user can add the `disable_selector_propagation` to the
`extension` set in the `implementation` selector.
Reviewed By: tianshilei1992
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95765
|
|
If we have nested declare variant context, it doesn't make sense to
inherit the match extension from the parent. Instead, just skip it.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95764
|
|
Initial support for using the OpenMPIRBuilder by clang to generate loops using the OpenMPIRBuilder. This initial support is intentionally limited to:
* Only the worksharing-loop directive.
* Recognizes only the nowait clause.
* No loop nests with more than one loop.
* Untested with templates, exceptions.
* Semantic checking left to the existing infrastructure.
This patch introduces a new AST node, OMPCanonicalLoop, which becomes parent of any loop that has to adheres to the restrictions as specified by the OpenMP standard. These restrictions allow OMPCanonicalLoop to provide the following additional information that depends on base language semantics:
* The distance function: How many loop iterations there will be before entering the loop nest.
* The loop variable function: Conversion from a logical iteration number to the loop variable.
These allow the OpenMPIRBuilder to act solely using logical iteration numbers without needing to be concerned with iterator semantics between calling the distance function and determining what the value of the loop variable ought to be. Any OpenMP logical should be done by the OpenMPIRBuilder such that it can be reused MLIR OpenMP dialect and thus by flang.
The distance and loop variable function are implemented using lambdas (or more exactly: CapturedStmt because lambda implementation is more interviewed with the parser). It is up to the OpenMPIRBuilder how they are called which depends on what is done with the loop. By default, these are emitted as outlined functions but we might think about emitting them inline as the OpenMPRuntime does.
For compatibility with the current OpenMP implementation, even though not necessary for the OpenMPIRBuilder, OMPCanonicalLoop can still be nested within OMPLoopDirectives' CapturedStmt. Although OMPCanonicalLoop's are not currently generated when the OpenMPIRBuilder is not enabled, these can just be skipped when not using the OpenMPIRBuilder in case we don't want to make the AST dependent on the EnableOMPBuilder setting.
Loop nests with more than one loop require support by the OpenMPIRBuilder (D93268). A simple implementation of non-rectangular loop nests would add another lambda function that returns whether a loop iteration of the rectangular overapproximation is also within its non-rectangular subset.
Reviewed By: jdenny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94973
|
|
The tile directive is in OpenMP's Technical Report 8 and foreseeably will be part of the upcoming OpenMP 5.1 standard.
This implementation is based on an AST transformation providing a de-sugared loop nest. This makes it simple to forward the de-sugared transformation to loop associated directives taking the tiled loops. In contrast to other loop associated directives, the OMPTileDirective does not use CapturedStmts. Letting loop associated directives consume loops from different capture context would be difficult.
A significant amount of code generation logic is taking place in the Sema class. Eventually, I would prefer if these would move into the CodeGen component such that we could make use of the OpenMPIRBuilder, together with flang. Only expressions converting between the language's iteration variable and the logical iteration space need to take place in the semantic analyzer: Getting the of iterations (e.g. the overload resolution of `std::distance`) and converting the logical iteration number to the iteration variable (e.g. overload resolution of `iteration + .omp.iv`). In clang, only CXXForRangeStmt is also represented by its de-sugared components. However, OpenMP loop are not defined as syntatic sugar. Starting with an AST-based approach allows us to gradually move generated AST statements into CodeGen, instead all at once.
I would also like to refactor `checkOpenMPLoop` into its functionalities in a follow-up. In this patch it is used twice. Once for checking proper nesting and emitting diagnostics, and additionally for deriving the logical iteration space per-loop (instead of for the loop nest).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76342
|
|
Part of the <=> changes in C++20 make certain patterns of writing equality
operators ambiguous with themselves (sorry!).
This patch goes through and adjusts all the comparison operators such that
they should work in both C++17 and C++20 modes. It also makes two other small
C++20-specific changes (adding a constructor to a type that cases to be an
aggregate, and adding casts from u8 literals which no longer have type
const char*).
There were four categories of errors that this review fixes.
Here are canonical examples of them, ordered from most to least common:
// 1) Missing const
namespace missing_const {
struct A {
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(A const&);
#else
bool operator==(A const&) const;
#endif
};
bool a = A{} == A{}; // error
}
// 2) Type mismatch on CRTP
namespace crtp_mismatch {
template <typename Derived>
struct Base {
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(Derived const&) const;
#else
// in one case changed to taking Base const&
friend bool operator==(Derived const&, Derived const&);
#endif
};
struct D : Base<D> { };
bool b = D{} == D{}; // error
}
// 3) iterator/const_iterator with only mixed comparison
namespace iter_const_iter {
template <bool Const>
struct iterator {
using const_iterator = iterator<true>;
iterator();
template <bool B, std::enable_if_t<(Const && !B), int> = 0>
iterator(iterator<B> const&);
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(const_iterator const&) const;
#else
friend bool operator==(iterator const&, iterator const&);
#endif
};
bool c = iterator<false>{} == iterator<false>{} // error
|| iterator<false>{} == iterator<true>{}
|| iterator<true>{} == iterator<false>{}
|| iterator<true>{} == iterator<true>{};
}
// 4) Same-type comparison but only have mixed-type operator
namespace ambiguous_choice {
enum Color { Red };
struct C {
C();
C(Color);
operator Color() const;
bool operator==(Color) const;
friend bool operator==(C, C);
};
bool c = C{} == C{}; // error
bool d = C{} == Red;
}
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78938
|
|
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
|
|
There is a build error with gcc-5 [0], investigating now.
[0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980#2456526
This reverts commit a5a14cbe7f87e01882ecaa14df5d596cbf38823a.
|
|
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
|
|
remove duplication
Since these are scoped enumerators, they have to be prefixed by DeclaratorContext, so lets remove Context from the name, and return some characters to the multiverse.
Patch was reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91011
Thank you to aaron, bruno, wyatt and barry for indulging me.
|
|
ParseOpenMP.cpp was pretty much clang-formatted except a few minor
locations. Let's make it a clang formatted file.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90440
|
|
With this extension the effects of `omp begin declare variant` will be
applied to template function declarations. The behavior is opt-in and
controlled by the `extension(allow_templates)` trait. While generally
useful, this will enable us to implement complex math function calls by
overloading the templates of the standard library with the ones in
libc++.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85735
|
|
This extension allows to declare variants in between `omp begin/end
declare variant` that do not match the type of the existing function
with that name. Without this extension we would not find a base function
(with a compatible type), therefore create a new one, which would
cause conflicting declarations. With this extension we will not create
"missing" base functions, which basically renders these specializations
harmless. They will be generated but never called.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85878
|
