| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Before D126061, Clang would warn about this code
```
struct X {
[[deprecated]] struct Y {};
};
```
with the warning
attribute 'deprecated' is ignored, place it after "struct" to apply attribute to type declaration
D126061 inadvertently caused this warning to no longer be emitted. This patch
restores the previous behavior.
The reason for the bug is that after D126061, C++11 attributes applied to a
member declaration are no longer placed in `DS.getAttributes()` but are instead
tracked in a separate list (`DeclAttrs`). In the case of a free-standing
decl-specifier-seq, we would simply ignore the contents of this list. Instead,
we now pass the list on to `Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec()` so that it can
issue the appropriate warning.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499
|
|
For backwards compatiblity, we emit only a warning instead of an error if the
attribute is one of the existing type attributes that we have historically
allowed to "slide" to the `DeclSpec` just as if it had been specified in GNU
syntax. (We will call these "legacy type attributes" below.)
The high-level changes that achieve this are:
- We introduce a new field `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (with appropriate
accessors) to store C++11 attributes occurring in the attribute-specifier-seq
at the beginning of a simple-declaration (and other similar declarations).
Previously, these attributes were placed on the `DeclSpec`, which made it
impossible to reconstruct later on whether the attributes had in fact been
placed on the decl-specifier-seq or ahead of the declaration.
- In the parser, we propgate declaration attributes and decl-specifier-seq
attributes separately until we can place them in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` or `DeclSpec::Attrs`, respectively.
- In `ProcessDeclAttributes()`, in addition to processing declarator attributes,
we now also process the attributes from `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (except
if they are legacy type attributes).
- In `ConvertDeclSpecToType()`, in addition to processing `DeclSpec` attributes,
we also process any legacy type attributes that occur in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (and emit a warning).
- We make `ProcessDeclAttribute` emit an error if it sees any non-declaration
attributes in C++11 syntax, except in the following cases:
- If it is being called for attributes on a `DeclSpec` or `DeclaratorChunk`
- If the attribute is a legacy type attribute (in which case we only emit
a warning)
The standard justifies treating attributes at the beginning of a
simple-declaration and attributes after a declarator-id the same. Here are some
relevant parts of the standard:
- The attribute-specifier-seq at the beginning of a simple-declaration
"appertains to each of the entities declared by the declarators of the
init-declarator-list" (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-3)
- "In the declaration for an entity, attributes appertaining to that entity can
appear at the start of the declaration and after the declarator-id for that
declaration." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-note-2)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq following a declarator-id appertains to
the entity that is declared."
(https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.meaning.general-1)
The standard contains similar wording to that for a simple-declaration in other
similar types of declarations, for example:
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in a parameter-declaration appertains to
the parameter." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#3)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in an exception-declaration appertains
to the parameter of the catch clause" (https://eel.is/c++draft/except.pre#1)
The new behavior is tested both on the newly added type attribute
`annotate_type`, for which we emit errors, and for the legacy type attribute
`address_space` (chosen somewhat randomly from the various legacy type
attributes), for which we emit warnings.
Depends On D111548
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126061
|
|
This is an analog to the `annotate` attribute but for types. The intent is to allow adding arbitrary annotations to types for use in static analysis tools.
For details, see this RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-new-attribute-annotate-type-iteration-2/61378
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111548
|
|
|
|
Currently, Clang accepts this code in C mode (where the tag is required
to be used) but rejects it in C++ mode thinking that the association is
defining a new type.
void foo(void) {
struct S { int a; };
_Generic(something, struct S : 1);
}
Clang thinks this in C++ because it sees struct S : when parsing the
class specifier and decides that must be a type definition (because the
colon signifies the presence of a base class type). This patch adds a
new declarator context to represent a _Generic association so that we
can distinguish these situations properly.
Fixes #55562
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126969
|
|
AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax (NFC)
This is setup for allowing hasAttribute to work for plugin-provided attributes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126902
|
|
With sufficiently tortured code, it's possible to cause a stack
overflow when parsing declarators. Thus, we now check for resource
exhaustion when recursively parsing declarators so that we can at least
warn the user we're about to crash before we actually crash.
Fixes #51642
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124915
|
|
CUDA/HIP programs use __noinline__ like a keyword e.g.
__noinline__ void foo() {} since __noinline__ is defined
as a macro __attribute__((noinline)) in CUDA/HIP runtime
header files.
However, gcc and clang supports __attribute__((__noinline__))
the same as __attribute__((noinline)). Some C++ libraries
use __attribute__((__noinline__)) in their header files.
When CUDA/HIP programs include such header files,
clang will emit error about invalid attributes.
This patch fixes this issue by supporting __noinline__ as
a keyword, so that CUDA/HIP runtime could remove
the macro definition.
Reviewed by: Aaron Ballman, Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124866
|
|
We had a think-o that would allow a user to declare a scoped
enumeration in C language modes "as a C++11 extension". This is a
think-o because there's no way for the user to spell the name of the
enumerators; C does not have '::' for a fully-qualified name. See
commit d0d87b597259a2b74ae5c2825a081c7e336cb1d0 for details on why this
is unintentional for C.
Fixes #42372
|
|
C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.
This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
|
|
WG14 has elected to remove support for K&R C functions in C2x. The
feature was introduced into C89 already deprecated, so after this long
of a deprecation period, the committee has made an empty parameter list
mean the same thing in C as it means in C++: the function accepts no
arguments exactly as if the function were written with (void) as the
parameter list.
This patch implements WG14 N2841 No function declarators without
prototypes (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2841.htm)
and WG14 N2432 Remove support for function definitions with identifier
lists (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2432.pdf).
It also adds The -fno-knr-functions command line option to opt into
this behavior in other language modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123955
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>
|
|
HLSL has a language feature called Semantics which get attached to
declarations like attributes and are used in a variety of ways.
One example of semantic use is here with the `SV_GroupIndex` semantic
which, when applied to an input for a compute shader is pre-populated
by the driver with a flattened thread index.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122699
# Conflicts:
# clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
# clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td
|
|
Don't warn on unknown type attributes in Parser::ProhibitCXX11Attributes
for most cases, but left the diagnostic to the later checks.
module declaration and module import declaration are special cases.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54817
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123447
|
|
As statement expression makes no sense in the default argument,
this patch tries to disable it in the all cases.
Please note that the statement expression is a GNU extension, which
means that Clang should be consistent with GCC. However, there's no
response from GCC devs since we have raised the issue for several weeks.
In this case, I think we can disallow statement expressions as a default
parameter in general for now, and relax the restriction if GCC folks
decide to retain the feature for functions but not lambdas in the
future.
Related discussion: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53488
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119609
|
|
|
|
Move the SourceRange from the old ParsedAttributesWithRange into
ParsedAttributesView, so we have source range information available
everywhere we use attributes.
This also removes ParsedAttributesWithRange (replaced by simply using
ParsedAttributes) and ParsedAttributesVieWithRange (replaced by using
ParsedAttributesView).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121201
|
|
This adds support for multiple attributes in `#pragma clang attribute push`, for example:
```
```
or
```
```
Related attributes can now be applied with a single pragma, which makes it harder for developers to make an accidental error later when editing the code.
rdar://78269653
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121283
|
|
It's almost always entirely unused and if it is used, the end of the
attribute range can be used instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120888
|
|
|
|
These changes make the Clang parser recognize expression parameter pack
expansion and initializer lists in attribute arguments. Because
expression parameter pack expansion requires additional handling while
creating and instantiating templates, the support for them must be
explicitly supported through the AcceptsExprPack flag.
Handling expression pack expansions may require a delay to when the
arguments of an attribute are correctly populated. To this end,
attributes that are set to accept these - through setting the
AcceptsExprPack flag - will automatically have an additional variadic
expression argument member named DelayedArgs. This member is not
exposed the same way other arguments are but is set through the new
CreateWithDelayedArgs creator function generated for applicable
attributes.
To illustrate how to implement support for expression pack expansion
support, clang::annotate is made to support pack expansions. This is
done by making handleAnnotationAttr delay setting the actual attribute
arguments until after template instantiation if it was unable to
populate the arguments due to dependencies in the parsed expressions.
|
|
C++17"
This reverts commit ef8206320769ad31422a803a0d6de6077fd231d2.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
|
|
As a conquence move llvm::array_lengthof from STLExtras.h to
STLForwardCompat.h (which is included by STLExtras.h so no build
breakage expected).
|
|
E.g. `Concept auto Func();`
The nameLoc for the constained auto type loc pointed to the concept name
loc, it should be the auto token loc. This patch fixes it, and remove
a relevant hack in clang-tidy check.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117009
|
|
The patch was reverted because it caused a crash during PCH build -- we
missed to update the RParenLoc in TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformAutoType.
This relands 55d96ac and 37ec65e with a test and fix.
|
|
This reverts commit 41fbdfa4d5601cccbcdc0ded8ef35190d502f7f3.
The commit breaks stage 2 builds with debug info, e.g.
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/5088/console
Clang crashes with the following assertion when building
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Timer.cpp
/usr/local/bin/sccache /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/host-compiler/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -Ilib/Support -I/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support -Iinclude -I/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/llvm-project/llvm/include -fno-stack-protector -fno-common -Wno-profile-instr-unprofiled -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/clang-build/Build/module.cache -fcxx-modules -Xclang -fmodules-local-submodule-visibility -gmodules -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -fdiagnostics-color -flto=thin -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -isysroot /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.15.sdk -std=c++14 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Timer.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Timer.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Timer.cpp.o -c /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage2-Rthinlto/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Timer.cpp
Assertion failed: (((getOffset()+Offset) & MacroIDBit) == 0 && "offset overflow"), function getLocWithOffset, file /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-RA/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h, line 135.
|
|
Reland 55d96ac and 37ec65e with a clang-tidy fix.
|
|
Identified with bugprone-argument-comment.
|
|
Identified with modernize-use-bool-literals.
|
|
|
|
Implementation is based on the "expected type" as used for
designated-initializers in braced init lists. This means it can deduce the type
in some cases where it's not written:
void foo(Widget);
foo({ /*help here*/ });
Only basic constructor calls are in scope of this patch, excluded are:
- aggregate initialization (no help is offered for aggregates)
- initializer_list initialization (no help is offered for these constructors)
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/306
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116317
|
|
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114609
|
|
the outline method definition.
The clang behavior was poor before this patch:
```
void B::foo() override {}
// Before: clang emited "expcted function body after function
// declarator", and skiped all contents until it hits a ";", the
// following function f() is discarded.
// VS
// Now "override is not allowed" with a remove fixit, and following f()
// is retained.
void f();
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111883
|
|
Currently, we have no front-end type for ppc_fp128 type in IR. PowerPC
target generates ppc_fp128 type from long double now, but there's option
(-mabi=(ieee|ibm)longdouble) to control it and we're going to do
transition from IBM extended double-double ppc_fp128 to IEEE fp128 in
the future.
This patch adds type __ibm128 which always represents ppc_fp128 in IR,
as what GCC did for that type. Without this type in Clang, compilation
will fail if compiling against future version of libstdcxx (which uses
__ibm128 in headers).
Although all operations in backend for __ibm128 is done by software,
only PowerPC enables support for it.
There's something not implemented in this commit, which can be done in
future ones:
- Literal suffix for __ibm128 type. w/W is suitable as GCC documented.
- __attribute__((mode(IF))) should be for __ibm128.
- Complex __ibm128 type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
|
|
This change defines a helper function getOpenCLCompatibleVersion()
inside LangOptions class. The function contains mapping between
C++ for OpenCL versions and their corresponding compatible OpenCL
versions. This mapping function should be updated each time a new
C++ for OpenCL language version is introduced. The helper function
is expected to simplify conditions on OpenCL C and C++ for OpenCL
versions inside compiler code.
Code refactoring performed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108693
|
|
Some Clang diagnostics could only report OpenCL C version. Because
C++ for OpenCL can be used as an alternative to OpenCL C, the text
for diagnostics should reflect that.
Desrciptions modified for these diagnostics:
`err_opencl_unknown_type_specifier`
`warn_option_invalid_ocl_version`
`err_attribute_requires_opencl_version`
`warn_opencl_attr_deprecated_ignored`
`ext_opencl_ext_vector_type_rgba_selector`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107648
|
|
Only the bare name is completed, with no args.
For args to be useful we need arg names. These *are* in the tablegen but
not currently emitted in usable form, so left this as future work.
C++11, C2x, GNU, declspec, MS syntax is supported, with the appropriate
spellings of attributes suggested.
`#pragma clang attribute` is supported but not terribly useful as we
only reach completion if parens are balanced (i.e. the line is not truncated)
There's no filtering of which attributes might make sense in this
grammatical context (e.g. attached to a function). In code-completion context
this is hard to do, and will only work in few cases :-(
There's also no filtering by langopts: this is because currently the
only way of checking is to try to produce diagnostics, which requires a
valid ParsedAttr which is hard to get.
This should be fairly simple to fix but requires some tablegen changes
to expose the logic without the side-effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107696
|
|
instantiations)
This patch implements paper P0692R1 from the C++20 standard. Disable usual access checking rules to template argument names in a declaration of partial specializations, explicit instantiation or explicit specialization (C++20 13.7.5/10, 13.9.1/6).
Fixes: https://llvm.org/PR37424
This patch also implements option *A* from this paper P0692R1 from the C++20 standard.
This patch follows the @rsmith suggestion from D78404.
Reviewed By: krisb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92024
|
|
'pipe' keyword is introduced in OpenCL C 2.0: so do checks for OpenCL C version while
parsing and then later on check for language options to construct actual pipe. This feature
requires support of __opencl_c_generic_address_space, so diagnostics for that is provided as well.
This is the same patch as in D106748 but with a tiny fix in checking of diagnostic messages.
Also added tests when program scope global variables are not supported.
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107154
|
|
This reverts commit d1e4b25756730576996457ba7324e9bf210e3693.
|
|
'pipe' keyword is introduced in OpenCL C 2.0: so do checks for OpenCL C version while
parsing and then later on check for language options to construct actual pipe. This feature
requires support of __opencl_c_generic_address_space, so diagnostics for that is provided as well.
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106748
|
|
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103401
|
|
OpenMP 5.1 added support for writing OpenMP directives using [[]]
syntax in addition to using #pragma and this introduces support for the
new syntax.
In OpenMP, the attributes take one of two forms:
[[omp::directive(...)]] or [[omp::sequence(...)]]. A directive
attribute contains an OpenMP directive clause that is identical to the
analogous #pragma syntax. A sequence attribute can contain either
sequence or directive arguments and is used to ensure that the
attributes are processed sequentially for situations where the order of
the attributes matter (remember:
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr.grammar#4.sentence-4).
The approach taken here is somewhat novel and deserves mention. We
could refactor much of the OpenMP parsing logic to work for either
pragma annotation tokens or for attribute clauses. It would be a fair
amount of effort to share the logic for both, but it's certainly
doable. However, the semantic attribute system is not designed to
handle the arbitrarily complex arguments that OpenMP directives
contain. Adding support to thread the novel parsed information until we
can produce a semantic attribute would be considerably more effort.
What's more, existing OpenMP constructs are not (often) represented as
semantic attributes. So doing this through Attr.td would be a massive
undertaking that would likely only benefit OpenMP and comes with
additional risks. Rather than walk down that path, I am taking
advantage of the fact that the syntax of the directives within the
directive clause is identical to that of the #pragma form. Once the
parser recognizes that we're processing an OpenMP attribute, it caches
all of the directive argument tokens and then replays them as though
the user wrote a pragma. This reuses the same OpenMP parsing and
semantic logic directly, but does come with a risk if the OpenMP
committee decides to purposefully diverge their pragma and attribute
syntaxes. So, despite this being a novel approach that does token
replay, I think it's actually a better approach than trying to do this
through the declarative syntax in Attr.td.
|
|
This is a re-application of dc67299 which was reverted in f63adf5b because
it broke the build. The issue should now be fixed.
Attribution note: The original author of this patch is Erik Pilkington.
I'm only trying to land it after rebasing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91630
|
|
using-declarations"
This reverts commit dc672999a9b12a156991891dc400308b52d569ba.
Breaks check-clang everywhere, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D91630
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91630
|
|
Currently when including stdbool.h and altivec.h declaration of `vector bool` leads to
errors due to `bool` being expanded to '_Bool`. This patch allows the parser
to recognize `_Bool`.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, Everybody0523
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102064
|
|
This change allows the use of identifiers for image types
from `cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing` freely in the kernel code if
the extension is not supported since they are not in the
list of the reserved identifiers.
This change also removed the need for pragma for the types
in the extensions since the spec does not require the pragma
uses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100983
|
|
Pipe has not been a reserved keyword in the earlier OpenCL
standards. However we failed to allow its use as an identifier
in the original commit. This issues is fixed now and testing
is improved accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101052
|
