aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/lib/Frontend/ASTUnit.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-10-05Revert "Fixes and closes #53952. Setting the ASTHasCompilerErrors member ↵Kazu Hirata1-5/+12
variable correctly based on the PP diagnostics. (#68127)" This reverts commit a50e63b38b931d945f97eac882278068221eca17. With clang-14.0.6 as the host compiler, I'm getting: ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: clang::ASTWriter::WriteAST(clang::Sema&, llvm::StringRef, clang::Module*, llvm::StringRef, bool, bool) >>> referenced by ASTUnit.cpp >>> ASTUnit.cpp.o:(clang::ASTUnit::serialize(llvm::raw_ostream&)) in archive lib/libclangFrontend.a
2023-10-05Fixes and closes #53952. Setting the ASTHasCompilerErrors member variable ↵Rajkumar Ananthu1-12/+5
correctly based on the PP diagnostics. (#68127) The issue #53952 is reported indicating clang is giving a crashing pch file, when hasErrors is been passed incorrectly to WriteAST method. To fix the issue, the parameter has been removed and instead we're relying on the results of `hasUncompilableErrorOccured()` instead of letting the caller override it. Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53952
2023-09-08Reapply "[clang] NFCI: Adopt `SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()`"Jan Svoboda1-2/+2
This reapplies ddbcc10b9e26b18f6a70e23d0611b9da75ffa52f, except for a tiny part that was reverted separately: 65331da0032ab4253a4bc0ddcb2da67664bd86a9. That will be reapplied later on, since it turned out to be more involved. This commit is enabled by 5523fefb01c282c4cbcaf6314a9aaf658c6c145f and f0f548a65a215c450d956dbcedb03656449705b9, specifically the part that makes 'clang-tidy/checkers/misc/header-include-cycle.cpp' separator agnostic.
2023-09-08[C++20] [Modules] Introduce ForceCheckCXX20ModulesInputFiles options forChuanqi Xu1-1/+5
C++20 modules Previously, we banned the check for input files from C++20 modules since we thought the BMI from C++20 modules should be a standalone artifact. However, during the recent experiment with clangd for modules, I find it is necessary to tell whether or not a BMI is out-of-date by checking the input files especially for language servers. So this patch brings a header search option ForceCheckCXX20ModulesInputFiles to allow the tools (concretly, clangd) to check the input files from BMI.
2023-09-06Revert "[clang] NFCI: Adopt `SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()`"Jan Svoboda1-2/+2
This reverts commit ddbcc10b9e26b18f6a70e23d0611b9da75ffa52f. The 'clang-tidy/checkers/misc/header-include-cycle.cpp' test started failing on Windows: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/216/builds/26855.
2023-09-06[clang] NFCI: Adopt `SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()`Jan Svoboda1-2/+2
This commit replaces some calls to the deprecated `FileEntry::getName()` with `FileEntryRef::getName()` by swapping current usages of `SourceManager::getFileEntryForID()` with `SourceManager::getFileEntryRefForID()`. This lowers the number of usages of the deprecated `FileEntry::getName()` from 95 to 50.
2023-09-05[clang] NFCI: Change returned LanguageOptions pointer to referenceJan Svoboda1-2/+2
2023-08-28Reland "[clang-repl] support code completion at a REPL."Fred Fu1-4/+7
Original commit message: " This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method. The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs. Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from previous input in the same REPL session. The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the REPL. In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like expression statements at the REPL. For example, clang-repl> int foo = 42; clang-repl> f<tab> From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not include foo. Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement and CCC_Statement respectively. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382 " The new patch also fixes clangd and several memory issues that the bots reported and upload the missing files.
2023-08-28Revert "Reland "[clang-repl] support code completion at a REPL.""Vassil Vassilev1-7/+4
This reverts commit 5ab25a42ba70c4b50214b0e78eaaccd30696fa09 due to forgotten files.
2023-08-28Reland "[clang-repl] support code completion at a REPL."Fred Fu1-4/+7
Original commit message: " This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method. The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs. Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from previous input in the same REPL session. The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the REPL. In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like expression statements at the REPL. For example, clang-repl> int foo = 42; clang-repl> f<tab> From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not include foo. Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement and CCC_Statement respectively. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382 " The new patch also fixes clangd and several memory issues that the bots reported.
2023-08-23Revert "[clang-repl] support code completion at a REPL."Vassil Vassilev1-7/+4
This reverts commit eb0e6c3134ef6deafe0a4958e9e1a1214b3c2f14 due to failures in clangd such as https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/57/builds/29377
2023-08-23[clang-repl] support code completion at a REPL.Fred Fu1-4/+7
This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method. The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs. Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from previous input in the same REPL session. The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the REPL. In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like expression statements at the REPL. For example, clang-repl> int foo = 42; clang-repl> f<tab> From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not include foo. Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement and CCC_Statement respectively. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382
2023-08-17[clang][modules] Avoid storing command-line macro definitions into ↵Jan Svoboda1-1/+2
implicitly built PCM files With implicit modules, it's impossible to load a PCM file that was built using different command-line macro definitions. This is guaranteed by the fact that they contribute to the context hash. This means that we don't need to store those macros into PCM files for validation purposes. This patch avoids serializing them in those circumstances, since there's no other use for command-line macro definitions (besides "-module-file-info"). For a typical Apple project, this speeds up the dependency scan by 5.6% and shrinks the cache with scanning PCMs by 26%. Reviewed By: benlangmuir Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158136
2023-06-30[clang] Fix leak in LoadFromCommandLineWorkingDirectory unit testHamish Knight1-2/+2
Change `ASTUnit::LoadFromCommandLine` to return a `std::unique_ptr` instead of a +1 pointer, fixing a leak in the unit test `LoadFromCommandLineWorkingDirectory`. Reviewed By: bnbarham, benlangmuir Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154257
2023-06-30[clang] Fix ASTUnit working directory handlingHamish Knight1-3/+7
Fix a couple of issues with the handling of the current working directory in ASTUnit: - Use `createPhysicalFileSystem` instead of `getRealFileSystem` to avoid affecting the process' current working directory, and set it at the top of `ASTUnit::LoadFromCommandLine` such that the driver used for argument parsing and the ASTUnit share the same VFS. This ensures that '-working-directory' correctly sets the VFS working directory in addition to the FileManager working directory. - Ensure we preserve the FileSystemOptions set on the FileManager when re-creating it (as `ASTUnit::Reparse` will clear the currently set FileManager). rdar://110697657 Reviewed By: bnbarham, benlangmuir Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154134
2023-06-30[clang] NFC, replace llvm::writeFileAtomically with llvm::writeToOutputHaojian Wu1-9/+2
API in ASTUnit.cpp writeFileAtomically is going to be deprecated, in favor of writeToOutput.
2023-06-27[clang][Sema] Add CodeCompletionContext::CCC_ObjCClassForwardDeclDavid Goldman1-0/+2
- Use this new context in Sema to limit completions to seen ObjC class names - Use this new context in clangd to disable include insertions when completing ObjC forward decls Reviewed By: kadircet Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150978
2023-06-15[clang][index] NFCI: Make `CXFile` a `FileEntryRef`Jan Svoboda1-3/+3
This patch swaps out the `void *` behind `CXFile` from `FileEntry *` to `FileEntryRef::MapEntry *`. This allows us to remove some deprecated uses of `FileEntry::getName()`. Depends on D151854. Reviewed By: benlangmuir Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151938
2023-05-23[C++20] [Modules] Don't ignore -fmodule-file when we compile pcm filesChuanqi Xu1-2/+3
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62843. Previously when we compile .pcm files into .o files, the `-fmodule-file=<module-name>=<module-path>` option is ignored. This is conflicted with our consensus in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62707.
2023-05-18[NFC][AST] Align one lineVitaly Buka1-1/+1
2023-05-18[AST] Initialize local counterVitaly Buka1-1/+1
I assume it's optional and ReadAST does not have to set the counter on success. Without the patch msan complains that we pass uninitialized value into noundef parameters of setCounterValue. Reviewed By: bnbarham, barannikov88 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150492
2023-05-16[NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Rename ASTContext::getNamedModuleForCodeGen to ↵Chuanqi Xu1-1/+1
ASTContext::getCurrentNamedModule The original name "ASTContext::getNamedModuleForCodeGen" is not properly reflecting the usage of the interface. This interface can be used to judge the current module unit in both sema analysis and code generation. So the original name was not so correct.
2023-05-16Revert "[NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Refactor Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU into"Chuanqi Xu1-1/+1
This reverts commit f109b1016801e2b0dbee278f3c517057c0b1d441 as required in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f109b1016801e2b0dbee278f3c517057c0b1d441#commitcomment-113477829.
2023-05-10[NFC] [C++20] [Modules] Refactor Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU intoChuanqi Xu1-1/+1
Decl::isInCurrentModuleUnit Refactor `Sema::isModuleUnitOfCurrentTU` to `Decl::isInCurrentModuleUnit` to make code simpler a little bit. Note that although this patch introduces a FIXME, this is an existing issue and this patch just tries to describe it explicitly.
2023-05-03[clang][deps] Make clang-scan-deps write modules in raw formatBen Langmuir1-1/+1
We have no use for debug info for the scanner modules, and writing raw ast files speeds up scanning ~15% in some cases. Note that the compile commands produced by the scanner will still build the obj format (if requested), and the scanner can *read* obj format pcms, e.g. from a PCH. rdar://108807592 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149693
2023-03-15[libclang] Add index option to store preambles in memoryIgor Kushnir1-8/+9
This commit allows libclang API users to opt into storing PCH in memory instead of temporary files. The option can be set only during CXIndex construction to avoid multithreading issues and confusion or bugs if some preambles are stored in temporary files and others - in memory. The added API works as expected in KDevelop: https://invent.kde.org/kdevelop/kdevelop/-/merge_requests/283 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145974
2023-03-07[libclang] Add API to override preamble storage pathIgor Kushnir1-7/+10
TempPCHFile::create() calls llvm::sys::fs::createTemporaryFile() to create a file named preamble-*.pch in a system temporary directory. This commit allows overriding the directory where these often many and large preamble-*.pch files are stored. The referenced bug report requests the ability to override the temporary directory path used by libclang. However, overriding the return value of llvm::sys::path::system_temp_directory() was rejected during code review as improper and because it would negatively affect multithreading performance. Finding all places where libclang uses the temporary directory is very difficult. Therefore this commit is limited to override libclang's single known use of the temporary directory. This commit allows to override the preamble storage path only during CXIndex construction to avoid multithreading issues and ensure that all preambles are stored in the same directory. For the same multithreading and consistency reasons, this commit deprecates clang_CXIndex_setGlobalOptions() and clang_CXIndex_setInvocationEmissionPathOption() in favor of specifying these options during CXIndex construction. Adding a new CXIndex constructor function each time a new initialization argument is needed leads to either a large number of function parameters unneeded by most libclang users or to an exponential number of overloads that support different usage requirements. Therefore this commit introduces a new extensible struct CXIndexOptions and a general function clang_createIndexWithOptions(). A libclang user passes a desired preamble storage path to clang_createIndexWithOptions(), which stores it in CIndexer::PreambleStoragePath. Whenever clang_parseTranslationUnit_Impl() is called, it passes CIndexer::PreambleStoragePath to ASTUnit::LoadFromCommandLine(), which stores this argument in ASTUnit::PreambleStoragePath. Whenever ASTUnit::getMainBufferWithPrecompiledPreamble() is called, it passes ASTUnit::PreambleStoragePath to PrecompiledPreamble::Build(). PrecompiledPreamble::Build() forwards the corresponding StoragePath argument to TempPCHFile::create(). If StoragePath is not empty, TempPCHFile::create() stores the preamble-*.pch file in the directory at the specified path rather than in the system temporary directory. The analysis below proves that this passing around of the PreambleStoragePath string is sufficient to guarantee that the libclang user override is used in TempPCHFile::create(). The analysis ignores API uses in test code. TempPCHFile::create() is called only in PrecompiledPreamble::Build(). PrecompiledPreamble::Build() is called only in two places: one in clangd, which is not used by libclang, and one in ASTUnit::getMainBufferWithPrecompiledPreamble(). ASTUnit::getMainBufferWithPrecompiledPreamble() is called in 3 places: ASTUnit::LoadFromCompilerInvocation() [analyzed below]. ASTUnit::Reparse(), which in turn is called only from clang_reparseTranslationUnit_Impl(), which in turn is called only from clang_reparseTranslationUnit(). clang_reparseTranslationUnit() is never called in LLVM code, but is part of public libclang API. This function's documentation requires its translation unit argument to have been built with clang_createTranslationUnitFromSourceFile(). clang_createTranslationUnitFromSourceFile() delegates its work to clang_parseTranslationUnit(), which delegates to clang_parseTranslationUnit2(), which delegates to clang_parseTranslationUnit2FullArgv(), which delegates to clang_parseTranslationUnit_Impl(), which passes CIndexer::PreambleStoragePath to the ASTUnit it creates. ASTUnit::CodeComplete() passes AllowRebuild = false to ASTUnit::getMainBufferWithPrecompiledPreamble(), which makes it return nullptr before calling PrecompiledPreamble::Build(). Both ASTUnit::LoadFromCompilerInvocation() overloads (one of which delegates its work to another) call ASTUnit::getMainBufferWithPrecompiledPreamble() only if their argument PrecompilePreambleAfterNParses > 0. LoadFromCompilerInvocation() is called in: ASTBuilderAction::runInvocation() keeps the default parameter value of PrecompilePreambleAfterNParses = 0, meaning that the preamble file is never created from here. ASTUnit::LoadFromCommandLine(). ASTUnit::LoadFromCommandLine() is called in two places: CrossTranslationUnitContext::ASTLoader::loadFromSource() keeps the default parameter value of PrecompilePreambleAfterNParses = 0, meaning that the preamble file is never created from here. clang_parseTranslationUnit_Impl(), which passes CIndexer::PreambleStoragePath to the ASTUnit it creates. Therefore, the overridden preamble storage path is always used in TempPCHFile::create(). TempPCHFile::create() uses PreambleStoragePath in the same way as LibclangInvocationReporter() uses InvocationEmissionPath. The existing documentation for clang_CXIndex_setInvocationEmissionPathOption() does not specify ownership, encoding, separator or relative vs absolute path requirements. So the documentation for CXIndexOptions::PreambleStoragePath doesn't either. The assumptions are: no ownership transfer; UTF-8 encoding; native separators. Both relative and absolute paths are supported. The added API works as expected in KDevelop: https://invent.kde.org/kdevelop/kdevelop/-/merge_requests/283 Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51847 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143418
2023-02-13[NFC] Set C++20 Named Modules for CodeGen in ASTContext in the early placeChuanqi Xu1-0/+4
Previously we'll set the named modules for ASTContext in ParseAST. But this is not intuitive and we need comments to tell the intuition. This patch moves the code the right the place, where the corrresponding module is first created/loaded. Now it is more intuitive and we can use the value in the earlier places.
2023-01-19Revert "[Clang] Give Clang the ability to use a shared stat cache"Fred Riss1-1/+1
This reverts commit c5abe893120b115907376359a5809229a9f9608a. This reverts commit a033dbbe5c43247b60869b008e67ed86ed230eaa. This broke the build with -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB=ON. Reverting while I investigate.
2023-01-18[Clang] Give Clang the ability to use a shared stat cacheFred Riss1-1/+1
Every Clang instance uses an internal FileSystemStatCache to avoid stating the same content multiple times. However, different instances of Clang will contend for filesystem access for their initial stats during HeaderSearch or module validation. On some workloads, the time spent in the kernel in these concurrent stat calls has been measured to be over 20% of the overall compilation time. This is extremly wassteful when most of the stat calls target mostly immutable content like a SDK. This commit introduces a new tool `clang-stat-cache` able to generate an OnDiskHashmap containing the stat data for a given filesystem hierarchy. The driver part of this has been modeled after -ivfsoverlay given the similarities with what it influences. It introduces a new -ivfsstatcache driver option to instruct Clang to use a stat cache generated by `clang-stat-cache`. These stat caches are inserted at the bottom of the VFS stack (right above the real filesystem). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136651
2023-01-14[clang] Remove remaining uses of llvm::Optional (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-1/+0
This patch removes several "using" declarations and #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h". This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14[clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-2/+2
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h". This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-09Move from llvm::makeArrayRef to ArrayRef deduction guides - clang/ partserge-sans-paille1-2/+1
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into several parts as it touches a lot of files. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141139
2022-12-10Don't include None.h (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-1/+0
I've converted all known uses of None to std::nullopt, so we no longer need to include None.h. This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-09[Frontend] Use std::optional in ASTUnit.cpp (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-3/+4
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-03[clang] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-1/+1
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to std::optional. This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-02[clang][modules] Serialize VFS overlay paths into PCMsJan Svoboda1-0/+29
With implicitly built modules, the importing `CompilerInstance` assumes PCMs were built in a "compatible way" (i.e. with similarly set up instance). Either because their context hash matches, or because this instance has just built them. There are some use-cases, however, where this assumption doesn't hold, libclang/c-index-test being one of them. There, the importing instance (or `ASTUnit`) is being set up while the PCM file is being deserialized. Until now, we've assumed the serialized paths to input files are the actual on-disk files, meaning the default physical VFS was always able to resolve them. This won't be the case after D135636. Therefore, this patch makes sure `ASTUnit` is initialized with the same VFS as the PCM it's deserializing - by storing paths to the VFS overlay files into the PCM itself. For the VFS overlay files to be adopted at the very start of PCM deserialization, they are stored in a new section in the unhashed control block, together with header search paths and system header prefixes. The move to the unhashed control block should be safe: if two modules were built with different header search paths and they produced different results, the hashed part of the PCM file will reflect that. Reviewed By: akyrtzi, benlangmuir Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135634
2022-11-21Don't use Optional::getPointer (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-1/+1
Since std::optional does not offer getPointer(), this patch replaces X.getPointer() with &*X to make the migration from llvm::Optional to std::optional easier. This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138466
2022-08-20Remove redundant initialization of Optional (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-1/+1
2022-06-20[clang] Don't use Optional::getValue (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-2/+1
2022-06-08Add a parameter to LoadFromASTFile that accepts a file system and defaults ↵Andy Soffer1-3/+2
to the real file-system. Reviewed By: ymandel Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126888
2022-05-10[Frontend] Flip default of CreateInvocationOptions::ProbePrecompiled to falseSam McCall1-0/+1
This is generally a better default for tools other than the compiler, which shouldn't assume a PCH file on disk is something they can consume. Preserve the old behavior in places associated with libclang/c-index-test (including ASTUnit) as there are tests relying on it and most important consumers are out-of-tree. It's unclear whether the tests are specifically trying to test this functionality, and what the downstream implications of removing it are. Hopefully someone more familiar can clean this up in future. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125149
2022-05-06[clang] createInvocationFromCommandLine -> createInvocation, delete former. NFCSam McCall1-2/+5
(Followup from 40c13720a4b977d4347bbde53c52a4d0703823c2) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125012
2022-01-09[clang] Fix bugprone argument comments (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-1/+1
Identified with bugprone-argument-comment.
2022-01-03[CodeCompletion] Signature help for braced constructor callsSam McCall1-2/+3
Implementation is based on the "expected type" as used for designated-initializers in braced init lists. This means it can deduce the type in some cases where it's not written: void foo(Widget); foo({ /*help here*/ }); Only basic constructor calls are in scope of this patch, excluded are: - aggregate initialization (no help is offered for aggregates) - initializer_list initialization (no help is offered for these constructors) Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/306 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116317
2021-10-17[clang] Use llvm::erase_if (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-3/+1
2021-08-12[CodeComplete] Basic code completion for attribute names.Sam McCall1-0/+1
Only the bare name is completed, with no args. For args to be useful we need arg names. These *are* in the tablegen but not currently emitted in usable form, so left this as future work. C++11, C2x, GNU, declspec, MS syntax is supported, with the appropriate spellings of attributes suggested. `#pragma clang attribute` is supported but not terribly useful as we only reach completion if parens are balanced (i.e. the line is not truncated) There's no filtering of which attributes might make sense in this grammatical context (e.g. attached to a function). In code-completion context this is hard to do, and will only work in few cases :-( There's also no filtering by langopts: this is because currently the only way of checking is to try to produce diagnostics, which requires a valid ParsedAttr which is hard to get. This should be fairly simple to fix but requires some tablegen changes to expose the logic without the side-effect. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107696
2021-07-12Reland "[clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery."Vassil Vassilev1-1/+2
Original commit message: [clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery. https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas: Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU that owns it. The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active" (most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration "comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however, belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template arguments. The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU. Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we decide to roll it back. Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it. Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation. Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs, e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists. It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when allocating declarations and types, though. We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately, but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates, since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class. Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are. We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later. Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols. This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance: ```./clang-repl clang-repl> int i = 12; error; In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations int i = 12; error; ^ error: Parsing failed. clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...); clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i); i=13 clang-repl> quit ``` Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
2021-07-11Revert "[clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery."Vassil Vassilev1-2/+1
This reverts commit 6775fc6ffa3ca1c36b20c25fa4e7f48f81213cf2. It also reverts "[lldb] Fix compilation by adjusting to the new ASTContext signature." This reverts commit 03a3f86071c10a1f6cbbf7375aa6fe9d94168972. We see some failures on the lldb infrastructure, these changes might play a role in it. Let's revert it now and see if the bots will become green. Ref: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
2021-07-11[clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery.Vassil Vassilev1-1/+2
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas: Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU that owns it. The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active" (most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration "comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however, belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template arguments. The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU. Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we decide to roll it back. Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it. Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation. Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs, e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists. It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when allocating declarations and types, though. We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately, but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates, since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class. Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are. We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later. Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols. This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance: ```./clang-repl clang-repl> int i = 12; error; In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1: input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations int i = 12; error; ^ error: Parsing failed. clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...); clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i); i=13 clang-repl> quit ``` Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918