| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
These files don't seem to use StringSwitch.
|
|
AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax (NFC)
This is setup for allowing hasAttribute to work for plugin-provided attributes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126902
|
|
While it's not as robust as using the attribute on enums/classes (the
type information may be lost through a function pointer, a declaration
or use of the underlying type without using the typedef, etc) but I
think there's still value in being able to attribute a typedef and have
all return types written with that typedef pick up the
warn_unused_result behavior.
Specifically I'd like to be able to annotate LLVMErrorRef (a wrapper for
llvm::Error used in the C API - the underlying type is a raw pointer, so
it can't be attributed itself) to reduce the chance of unhandled errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102122
|
|
OpenMP 5.1 added support for writing OpenMP directives using [[]]
syntax in addition to using #pragma and this introduces support for the
new syntax.
In OpenMP, the attributes take one of two forms:
[[omp::directive(...)]] or [[omp::sequence(...)]]. A directive
attribute contains an OpenMP directive clause that is identical to the
analogous #pragma syntax. A sequence attribute can contain either
sequence or directive arguments and is used to ensure that the
attributes are processed sequentially for situations where the order of
the attributes matter (remember:
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr.grammar#4.sentence-4).
The approach taken here is somewhat novel and deserves mention. We
could refactor much of the OpenMP parsing logic to work for either
pragma annotation tokens or for attribute clauses. It would be a fair
amount of effort to share the logic for both, but it's certainly
doable. However, the semantic attribute system is not designed to
handle the arbitrarily complex arguments that OpenMP directives
contain. Adding support to thread the novel parsed information until we
can produce a semantic attribute would be considerably more effort.
What's more, existing OpenMP constructs are not (often) represented as
semantic attributes. So doing this through Attr.td would be a massive
undertaking that would likely only benefit OpenMP and comes with
additional risks. Rather than walk down that path, I am taking
advantage of the fact that the syntax of the directives within the
directive clause is identical to that of the #pragma form. Once the
parser recognizes that we're processing an OpenMP attribute, it caches
all of the directive argument tokens and then replays them as though
the user wrote a pragma. This reuses the same OpenMP parsing and
semantic logic directly, but does come with a risk if the OpenMP
committee decides to purposefully diverge their pragma and attribute
syntaxes. So, despite this being a novel approach that does token
replay, I think it's actually a better approach than trying to do this
through the declarative syntax in Attr.td.
|
|
|
|
Currently square-bracket-style (CXX11/C2X) attribute names are normalised to
start with :: if they don't have a namespace. This is a bit odd, as such
names are rejected when parsing, so don't do this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76704
|
|
When constructing a ParsedAttr the ParsedAttrInfo gets looked up in the
AttrInfoMap, which is auto-generated using tablegen. If that lookup fails then
we look through the ParsedAttrInfos that plugins have added to the registry and
check if any has a spelling that matches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31338
|
|
r371875 moved some functionality around to a Basic header file, but
didn't move its definitions as well. This patch moves some things
around so that shared library building can work.
llvm-svn: 371985
|
|
Currently, we only accept clang as the scoped attribute identifier for double square bracket attributes provided by Clang, but this has the potential to conflict with user-defined macros. To help alleviate these concerns, this introduces the _Clang scoped attribute identifier as an alias for clang. It also introduces a warning with a fixit on the off chance someone attempts to use __clang__ as the scoped attribute (which is a predefined compiler identification macro).
llvm-svn: 346521
|
|
This is useful in libstdc++ to avoid clashes with identifiers in the user's namespace.
llvm-svn: 345132
|
|
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
|
|
Some tests fail on the Windows buildbots. I will have to investigate more.
This commit reverts r300539, r300540 and r300542.
llvm-svn: 300543
|
|
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
|
|
Clang used to silently ignore __declspec(novtable). It is implemented
now, but leaving the vtable uninitialized does not work when using the
Itanium ABI, where the class layout for complex class hierarchies is
stored in the vtable. It might be possible to honor the novtable
attribute in some simple cases and either report an error or ignore
it in more complex situations, but it’s not clear if that would be
worthwhile. There is also value in having a simple and predictable
behavior, so this changes clang to simply ignore novtable when not using
the Microsoft C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 242730
|
|
support for __has_cpp_attribute.
llvm-svn: 221991
|
|
hasAttribute. No functional changes.
llvm-svn: 205201
|
|
Clean up the __has_attribute implementation without modifying its behavior.
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 205181
|
|
results, some still have link errors.
llvm-svn: 204974
|
|
with non-MSVC compilers.
llvm-svn: 204968
|
|
llvm-svn: 204955
|
|
Replaces the tablegen-driven AttrSpellings.inc, which lived in the lexing layer with AttrHasAttributeImpl.inc, which lives in the basic layer. Updates the preprocessor to call through to this new functionality which can take additional information into account (such as scopes and syntaxes).
Expose the ability for parts of the compiler to ask whether an attribute is supported for a given spelling (including scope), syntax, triple and language options.
llvm-svn: 204952
|
