From af96be34825586536ebcfbf5c675e795ddd3c8fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wilco Dijkstra <wdijkstr@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:44:41 +0000
Subject: Rather than using a C implementation of memmove, directly call
 memmove, which typically has a much faster optimized implementation.

---
 string/bcopy.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

(limited to 'string')

diff --git a/string/bcopy.c b/string/bcopy.c
index 326478a..f74e589 100644
--- a/string/bcopy.c
+++ b/string/bcopy.c
@@ -17,12 +17,8 @@
 
 #include <string.h>
 
-#define	memmove		bcopy
-#define	rettype		void
-#define	RETURN(s)	return
-#define	a1		src
-#define	a1const		const
-#define	a2		dest
-#define	a2const
-
-#include <string/memmove.c>
+void
+bcopy (const void *src, void *dest, size_t len)
+{
+  memmove (dest, src, len);
+}
-- 
cgit v1.1