From b2b28911645ee10d8a9b843c2d7406abe16a250a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 22:15:49 +0000 Subject: Update. 2000-02-23 Andreas Jaeger * dlfcn/dlopen.c: Include for NULL. * dlfcn/dlsym.c: Likewise. * dlfcn/dlvsym.c: Likewise. * iconv/gconv.c: Likewise. --- FAQ.in | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'FAQ.in') diff --git a/FAQ.in b/FAQ.in index c130a86..0581b35 100644 --- a/FAQ.in +++ b/FAQ.in @@ -346,7 +346,6 @@ compatibility - forever! The binary compatibility you lose is not only against the previous version of the GNU libc (version 2.0) but also against all future versions. - ?? How can I compile on my fast ix86 machine a working libc for my slow i386? After installing libc, programs abort with "Illegal Instruction". @@ -363,6 +362,22 @@ And you need to tell gcc to only generate i386 code, just add `-mcpu=i386' {UD} This applies not only to the i386. Compiling on a i686 for any older model will also fail if the above methods are not used. +?? `make' complains about a missing dlfcn/libdl.so when building + malloc/libmemprof.so. How can I fix this? + +{AJ} Older make version (<= 3.78.90) have a bug which was hidden by a bug in +glibc (<= 2.1.2). You need to upgrade make to a newer or fixed version. A +patch is available via +. + +After upgrading make, you should remove the file sysd-sorted in your build +directory. The problem is that the broken make creates a wrong order for +one list in that file. The list has to be recreated with the new make - +which happens if you remove the file. + +You might encounter this bug also in other situations where make scans +directories. I strongly advise to upgrade your make version. + ? Installation and configuration issues -- cgit v1.1