1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
|
# Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite.
# This contains tests for GDB's use of RTTI information. This stems
# from a bug reported in PR gdb/488 and other places, which leads to
# statements like 'warning: can't find class named 'C::D', as given by
# C++ RTTI'. It arises from GDB not knowing about classes that are
# defined in namespaces.
# NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: I suspect it could arise from nested class
# issues, too, and even once we fix that, there might be situations
# (involving templates, in particular) where this problem triggers
# because GDB and GCC have different ideas what a class is called.
if $tracelevel then {
strace $tracelevel
}
if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
#
# test running programs
#
set prms_id 0
set bug_id 0
set testfile "rtti"
set srcfile1 "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.cc"
set objfile1 "${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.o"
set srcfile2 "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.cc"
set objfile2 "${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.o"
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
# gdb_get_line_number needs this to be called srcfile.
set srcfile "${srcfile1}"
if { [gdb_compile "${srcfile1}" "${objfile1}" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
}
if { [gdb_compile "${srcfile2}" "${objfile2}" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
}
if { [gdb_compile "${objfile1} ${objfile2}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
}
if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
return -1
}
gdb_exit
gdb_start
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load ${binfile}
if ![runto_main] then {
perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
continue
}
# First, run to after we've constructed the object:
gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "constructs-done"]
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors"
gdb_test_multiple "print *e1" "print *e1" {
-re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n1::D1'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb HEAD 2003-12-05
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
}
-re "warning: can't find class named `n1::D1', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb 6.0
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n1::Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "print *e1"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
# NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: If code is compiled by GCC2, we
# don't print the warning (for no particular reason), but we
# still call the class via the wrong name; PR gdb/57 is our
# catch-all PR for nested type problems.
kfail "gdb/57" "print *e1"
}
}
# NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: This test fails on my branch with an
# "<incomplete type>" message because, within rtt1.cc, GDB has no way
# of knowing that the class is called 'n2::D2' instead of just 'D2'.
# This is an artifical test case, though: if we were using these
# classes in a more substantial way, G++ would emit more debug info.
# As is, I don't think there's anything that GDB can do about this
# case until G++ starts emitting DW_TAG_namespace info; when that part
# of the branch gets merged in, then we'll probably want to convert
# that fail branch to an xfail.
gdb_test_multiple "print *e2" "print *e2" {
-re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n2::D2'.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb HEAD 2003-12-05
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
}
-re "warning: can't find class named `n2::D2', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
# gdb 6.0
kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = <incomplete type>\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
# See above NOTE.
fail "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "print *e2"
}
-re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
kfail "gdb/57" "print *e2"
}
}
gdb_exit
return 0
|
