1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
|
if $nosignals {
verbose "Skipping signals.exp because of nosignals."
continue
}
if $tracelevel then {
strace $tracelevel
}
set prms_id 0
set bug_id 0
set binfile $objdir/$subdir/signals
if ![file exists $binfile] then {
perror "$binfile does not exist."
return 0
}
proc signal_tests_1 {} {
global prompt
if [runto_main] then {
gdb_test "next" "signal \\(SIGUSR1.*" \
"next over signal (SIGALRM, handler)"
gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" \
"next over signal (SIGUSR1, handler)"
gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* first \\*/" \
"next over alarm (1)"
# An alarm has been signaled, give the signal time to get delivered.
exec sleep 2
# i386 BSD currently fails the next test with a SIGTRAP.
setup_xfail "i*86-*-bsd*"
# But Dynix has a DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK of zero, so the failure
# is shadowed by hitting the through_sigtramp_breakpoint.
clear_xfail "i*86-sequent-bsd*"
# Univel SVR4 i386 continues instead of stepping.
setup_xfail "i*86-univel-sysv4*"
# lynx fails with "next" acting like "continue"
setup_xfail "*-*-*lynx*"
# linux (aout versions) also fails with "next" acting like "continue"
# this is probably more dependant on the kernel version than on the
# object file format or utils. (sigh)
setup_xfail "i*86-*-linuxaout" "i*86-*-linuxoldld"
send "next\n"
expect {
-re "alarm .*$prompt $" { pass "next to 2nd alarm (1)" }
-re "Program received signal SIGTRAP.*first.*$prompt $" {
# This can happen on machines that have a trace flag
# in their PS register.
# The trace flag in the PS register will be set due to
# the `next' command.
# Before calling the signal handler, the PS register
# is pushed along with the context on the user stack.
# When the signal handler has finished, it reenters the
# the kernel via a sigreturn syscall, which restores the
# PS register along with the context.
# If the kernel erroneously does not clear the trace flag
# in the pushed context, gdb will receive a SIGTRAP from
# the set trace flag in the restored context after the
# signal handler has finished.
# I do not yet understand why the SIGTRAP does not occur
# after stepping the instruction at the restored PC on
# i386 BSDI 1.0 systems.
# Note that the vax under Ultrix also exhibits
# this behaviour (it is uncovered by the `continue from
# a break in a signal handler' test below).
# With this test the failure is shadowed by hitting the
# through_sigtramp_breakpoint upon return from the signal
# handler.
fail "next to 2nd alarm (1) (probably kernel bug)"
gdb_test "next" "alarm.*" "next to 2nd alarm (1)"
}
-re "Program exited with code.*$prompt $" {
# This is apparently a bug in the UnixWare kernel (but
# has not been investigated beyond the
# resume/target_wait level, and has not been reported
# to Univel). If it steps when a signal is pending,
# it does a continue instead. I don't know whether
# there is a workaround.
# Perhaps this problem exists on other SVR4 systems;
# but (a) we have no reason to think so, and (b) if we
# put a wrong xfail here, we never get an XPASS to let
# us know that it was incorrect (and then if such a
# configuration regresses we have no way of knowing).
# Solaris is not a relevant data point either way
# because it lacks single stepping.
# fnf: I don't agree with the above philosophy. We
# can never be sure that any particular XFAIL is
# specified 100% correctly in that no systems with
# the bug are missed and all systems without the bug
# are excluded. If we include an XFAIL that isn't
# appropriate for a particular system, then when that
# system gets tested it will XPASS, and someone should
# investigate and fix the setup_xfail as appropriate,
# or more preferably, the actual bug. Each such case
# adds more data to narrowing down the scope of the
# problem and ultimately fixing it.
setup_xfail "i*86-*-sysv4*"
fail "'next' behaved as 'continue (known SVR4 bug)'"
return 0
}
-re ".*$prompt $" { fail "next to 2nd alarm (1)" }
timeout { fail "next to 2nd alarm (1); (timeout)" }
eof { fail "next to 2nd alarm (1); (eof)" }
}
gdb_test "break handler" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* second \\*/" \
"next to 2nd ++count in signals_tests_1"
# An alarm has been signaled, give the signal time to get delivered.
exec sleep 2
set bash_bug 0
send "next\n"
setup_xfail "i*86-*-linux"
expect {
-re "Breakpoint.*handler.*$prompt $" {
pass "next to handler in signals_tests_1"
}
-re "Program received signal SIGEMT.*$prompt $" {
# Bash versions before 1.13.5 cause this behaviour
# by blocking SIGTRAP.
fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (known problem with bash versions before 1.13.5)"
set bash_bug 1
gdb_test "signal 0" "Breakpoint.*handler.*"
}
-re ".*$prompt $" { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1" }
timeout { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (timeout)" }
eof { fail "next to handler in signals_tests_1 (eof)" }
}
# This doesn't test that main is frame #2, just that main is frame
# #2, #3, or higher. At some point this should be fixed (but
# it quite possibly would introduce new FAILs on some systems).
setup_xfail "i*86-*-linux" "i*86-*-bsdi2.0"
gdb_test "backtrace" "#0.*handler.*#1.*#2.*main.*" \
"backtrace in signals_tests_1"
gdb_test "break func1" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
gdb_test "break func2" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
# Vax Ultrix and i386 BSD currently fail the next test with
# a SIGTRAP, but with different symptoms.
setup_xfail "vax-*-ultrix*"
setup_xfail "i*86-*-bsd*"
setup_xfail "i*86-*-linux"
send "continue\n"
expect {
-re "Breakpoint.*func1.*$prompt $" { pass "continue to func1" }
-re "Program received signal SIGTRAP.*second.*$prompt $" {
# See explanation for `next to 2nd alarm (1)' fail above.
# We did step into the signal handler, hit a breakpoint
# in the handler and continued from the breakpoint.
# The set trace flag in the restored context is causing
# the SIGTRAP, without stepping an instruction.
fail "continue to func1 (probably kernel bug)"
gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func1.*" \
"extra continue to func1"
}
-re "Program received signal SIGTRAP.*func1 ..;.*$prompt $" {
# On the vax under Ultrix the set trace flag in the restored
# context is causing the SIGTRAP, but after stepping one
# instruction, as expected.
fail "continue to func1 (probably kernel bug)"
gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func1.*" \
"extra continue to func1"
}
-re ".*$prompt $" { fail "continue to func1" }
default { fail "continue to func1" }
}
setup_xfail "*-*-irix*"
setup_xfail "i*86-*-linux"
send "signal SIGUSR1\n"
expect {
-re "Breakpoint.*handler.*$prompt $" { pass "signal SIGUSR1" }
-re "Program received signal SIGUSR1.*$prompt $" {
# This is what irix4 and irix5 do.
# It would appear to be a kernel bug.
fail "signal SIGUSR1"
gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*handler.*" "pass it SIGUSR1"
}
-re ".*$prompt $" { fail "signal SIGUSR1" }
default { fail "signal SIGUSR1" }
}
# Will tend to wrongly require an extra continue.
# The problem here is that the breakpoint at func1 will be
# inserted, and when the system finishes with the signal
# handler it will try to execute there. For GDB to try to
# remember that it was going to step over a breakpoint when a
# signal happened, distinguish this case from the case where
# func1 is called from the signal handler, etc., seems
# exceedingly difficult. So don't expect this to get fixed
# anytime soon.
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
send "continue\n"
expect {
-re "Breakpoint.*func2.*$prompt $" { pass "continue to func2" }
-re "Breakpoint.*func1.*$prompt $" {
fail "continue to func2"
gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*func2.*" \
"extra continue to func2"
}
-re ".*$prompt $" { fail "continue to func2" }
default { fail "continue to func2" }
}
exec sleep 2
# GDB yanks out the breakpoints to step over the breakpoint it
# stopped at, which means the breakpoint at handler is yanked.
# But if NO_SINGLE_STEP, we won't get another chance to reinsert
# them (at least not with procfs, where we tell the kernel not
# to tell gdb about `pass' signals). So the fix would appear to
# be to just yank that one breakpoint when we step over it.
setup_xfail "sparc-*-*"
setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*"
setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
# A faulty bash will not step the inferior into sigtramp on sun3.
if {$bash_bug} then {
setup_xfail "m68*-*-sunos4*"
}
setup_xfail "i*86-*-linux"
gdb_test "continue" "Breakpoint.*handler.*" "continue to handler"
# If the NO_SINGLE_STEP failure happened, we have already exited.
# If we succeeded a continue will return from the handler to func2.
# GDB now has `forgotten' that it intended to step over the
# breakpoint at func2 and will stop at func2.
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
# The sun3 with a faulty bash will also be `forgetful' but it
# already got the spurious stop at func2 and this continue will work.
if {$bash_bug} then {
clear_xfail "m68*-*-sunos4*"
}
gdb_test "continue" "Program exited with code 010\\." \
"continue to exit in signals_tests_1 "
}
}
# On a few losing systems, ptrace (PT_CONTINUE) or ptrace (PT_STEP)
# causes pending signals to be cleared, which causes these tests to
# get nowhere fast. This is totally losing behavior (perhaps there
# are cases in which is it useful but the user needs more control,
# which they mostly have in GDB), but some people apparently think it
# is a feature. It is documented in the ptrace manpage on Motorola
# Delta Series sysV68 R3V7.1 and on HPUX 9.0. Even the non-HPUX PA
# OSes (BSD and OSF/1) seem to have figured they had to copy this
# braindamage.
if {[ istarget "m68*-motorola-*" ] || [ istarget "hppa*-*-bsd*" ] ||
[ istarget "*-*-hpux*" ] || [ istarget "hppa*-*-osf*" ]} then {
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
fail "ptrace loses on signals on this target"
return 0
}
# lynx2.2.2 doesn't lose signals, instead it screws up the stack pointer
# in some of these tests leading to massive problems. I've
# reported this to lynx, hopefully it'll be fixed in lynx2.3.
# Severe braindamage.
if [ istarget "*-*-*lynx*" ] then {
setup_xfail "*-*-*"
fail "kernel scroggs stack pointer in signal tests on this target"
return 0
}
gdb_exit
gdb_start
# This will need to be updated as the exact list of signals changes,
# but I want to test that TARGET_SIGNAL_0, TARGET_SIGNAL_DEFAULT, and
# TARGET_SIGNAL_UNKNOWN are skipped.
setup_xfail "i*86-unknown-bsdi2.0"
gdb_test "handle all print" "Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description\r\nSIGHUP Yes Yes Yes Hangup.*SIG63 Yes Yes Yes Real-time event 63"
gdb_exit
gdb_start
gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
gdb_load $binfile
signal_tests_1
# Force a resync, so we're looking at the right prompt. On SCO we
# were getting out of sync (I don't understand why).
send "p 1+1\n"
expect {
-re "= 2.*$prompt $" {}
-re ".*$prompt $" { perror "sync trouble in signals.exp" }
default { perror "sync trouble in signals.exp" }
}
if [runto_main] then {
gdb_test "break handler if 0" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
gdb_test "set \$handler_breakpoint_number = \$bpnum" ""
# Get to the point where a signal is waiting to be delivered
gdb_test "next" "signal \\(SIGUSR1.*" "next to signal in signals.exp"
gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" "next to alarm #1 in signals.exp"
gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* first \\*/" \
"next to ++count #1 in signals.exp"
# Give the signal time to get delivered
exec sleep 2
# Now call a function. When GDB tries to run the stack dummy,
# it will hit the breakpoint at handler. Provided it doesn't
# lose its cool, this is not a problem, it just has to note
# that the breakpoint condition is false and keep going.
gdb_test "p func1 ()" "^p func1 \\(\\)\r\n.\[0-9\]* = void" \
"p func1 () #1 in signals.exp"
# Make sure the count got incremented.
# Haven't investigated this xfail
setup_xfail "rs6000-*-*"
setup_xfail "powerpc-*-*"
gdb_test "p count" "= 2" "p count #1 in signals.exp"
if { [istarget "rs6000-*-*"] || [istarget "powerpc-*-*"] } { return 0 }
gdb_test "condition \$handler_breakpoint_number" "now unconditional\\."
gdb_test "next" "alarm \\(.*" "next to alarm #2 in signals.exp"
gdb_test "next" "\\+\\+count; /\\* second \\*/" \
"next to ++count #2 in signals.exp"
exec sleep 2
# This time we stop when GDB tries to run the stack dummy.
# So it is OK that we do not print the return value from the function.
gdb_test "p func1 ()" \
"Breakpoint \[0-9\]*, handler.*
The program being debugged stopped while in a function called from GDB.*" \
"p func1 () #2 in signals.exp"
# But we should be able to backtrace...
gdb_test "bt" "#0.*handler.*#1.*#2.*main.*" "bt in signals.exp"
# ...and continue...
gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\." "continue in signals.exp"
# ...and then count should have been incremented
gdb_test "p count" "= 5" "p count #2 in signals.exp"
}
return 0
|