# Copyright 2007-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

# Test that breakpoints on C++ constructors work, despite the
# fact that gcc generates several versions of constructor function.

require allow_cplus_tests


standard_testfile .cc

if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile {debug c++}]} {
    return -1
}

if {[test_compiler_info {clang-*-*} c++]} {
    set using_clang true
} else {
    set using_clang false
}

if {![runto_main]} {
    return
}

# Set a breakpoint with multiple locations
# and a condition.

gdb_test "break 'Derived::Derived(int)'" \
    "Breakpoint.*at.*: Derived::Derived.int.. \\(2 locations\\).*" \
    "set-breakpoint at ctor"

gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint here"]

gdb_test "break 'Derived::~Derived()'" \
    "Breakpoint.*at.*: Derived::~Derived... \\(2 locations\\).*" \
    "set-breakpoint at dtor"

gdb_test "continue" \
    ".*Breakpoint.*Derived.*i=7.*" \
    "run to breakpoint 1 v1"

gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here, first time" ".* breakpoint here"

gdb_test "continue" \
    ".*Breakpoint.*Derived.*i=15.*" \
    "run to breakpoint 1 v2"

gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here, second time" ".* breakpoint here"

gdb_test "continue" \
    ".*Breakpoint.*Derived.*i=24.*" \
    "run to breakpoint 1 dynamic v1"

gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here, first dynamic time"\
    ".* breakpoint here"

gdb_test "continue" \
    ".*Breakpoint.*Derived.*i=42.*" \
    "run to breakpoint 1 dynamic v2"

gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "set breakpoint here, second dynamic time"\
    ".* breakpoint here"

gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*" "Run to dynamic destructor v1"

# Clang makes Derived::~Derived(this) call Derived::~Derives(this, vtt)
# whereas gcc puts all the logic necessary on both functions.
if {$using_clang} {
    gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*"\
	"clang's nested dynamic destructor call"
}

gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*" "Run to dynamic destructor v2"

gdb_test "continue" \
    ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*" \
    "run to breakpoint 3 v1"

gdb_test "continue" \
    ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*" \
    "run to breakpoint 3 v2"

if {$using_clang} {
    gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint.*~Derived.*"\
	"clang's nested destructor call"
}

gdb_test "continue" \
    ".*exited normally.*" \
    "run to exit"