From e90bd60df3c40a3a693f502f9e65eefdb377c75c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Kingdon Date: Thu, 29 Sep 1994 15:26:16 +0000 Subject: * xcoffread.c (read_xcoff_symtab): Fix comment for yesterday's change. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ gdb/xcoffread.c | 13 ++++++------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb') diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 94eaa73..b309561 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +Thu Sep 29 08:22:27 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com) + + * xcoffread.c (read_xcoff_symtab): Fix comment for yesterday's change. + Wed Sep 28 17:48:18 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com) * coffread.c (complete_symtab): If last_source_file is set upon diff --git a/gdb/xcoffread.c b/gdb/xcoffread.c index 70f501d..5605131 100644 --- a/gdb/xcoffread.c +++ b/gdb/xcoffread.c @@ -1405,13 +1405,12 @@ read_xcoff_symtab (objfile, nsyms) continue; default: - /* xlc and old versions of gcc put each variable in a - separate csect, so we get an XTY_SD. But new (2.5? - 2.6? something like that) gcc's put several variables - in a csect, so that each variable only gets an XTY_LD. - We still need to record them. This will typically be - XMC_RW; I suspect XMC_RO and XMC_BS might be possible - too. */ + /* xlc puts each variable in a separate csect, so we get + an XTY_SD for each variable. But gcc puts several + variables in a csect, so that each variable only gets + an XTY_LD. We still need to record them. This will + typically be XMC_RW; I suspect XMC_RO and XMC_BS might + be possible too. */ break; } -- cgit v1.1