From 788eca4949d08494109249d35cd599971ce6ec51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Marchi Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:57:07 -0500 Subject: gdb: remove use of iterate_over_inferiors in mi/mi-interp.c Replace it with a range-based for. I've updated the comment in mi_interp::init, which was a bit stale. gdb/ChangeLog: * mi/mi-interp.c (report_initial_inferior): Remove. (mi_interp::init): Use range-based for to iterate over inferiors. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ gdb/mi/mi-interp.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb') diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 2de025d..c68bc99 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ 2020-01-17 Simon Marchi + * mi/mi-interp.c (report_initial_inferior): Remove. + (mi_interp::init): Use range-based for to iterate over inferiors. + +2020-01-17 Simon Marchi + * python/py-inferior.c (build_inferior_list): Remove. (gdbpy_ref): Use range-based for loop to iterate over inferiors. diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c b/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c index 2ac4c11..e77093c 100644 --- a/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c +++ b/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c @@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ static void mi_memory_changed (struct inferior *inf, CORE_ADDR memaddr, ssize_t len, const bfd_byte *myaddr); static void mi_on_sync_execution_done (void); -static int report_initial_inferior (struct inferior *inf, void *closure); - /* Display the MI prompt. */ static void @@ -137,12 +135,27 @@ mi_interp::init (bool top_level) if (top_level) { - /* The initial inferior is created before this function is - called, so we need to report it explicitly. Use iteration in - case future version of GDB creates more than one inferior - up-front. */ - iterate_over_inferiors (report_initial_inferior, mi); - } + /* The initial inferior is created before this function is called, so we + need to report it explicitly when initializing the top-level MI + interpreter. + + This is also called when additional MI interpreters are added (using + the new-ui command), when multiple inferiors possibly exist, so we need + to use iteration to report all the inferiors. mi_inferior_added can't + be used, because it would print the event on all the other MI UIs. */ + + for (inferior *inf : all_inferiors ()) + { + target_terminal::scoped_restore_terminal_state term_state; + target_terminal::ours_for_output (); + + fprintf_unfiltered (mi->event_channel, + "thread-group-added,id=\"i%d\"", + inf->num); + + gdb_flush (mi->event_channel); + } + } } void @@ -1253,26 +1266,6 @@ mi_user_selected_context_changed (user_selected_what selection) } } -static int -report_initial_inferior (struct inferior *inf, void *closure) -{ - /* This function is called from mi_interpreter_init, and since - mi_inferior_added assumes that inferior is fully initialized - and top_level_interpreter_data is set, we cannot call - it here. */ - struct mi_interp *mi = (struct mi_interp *) closure; - - target_terminal::scoped_restore_terminal_state term_state; - target_terminal::ours_for_output (); - - fprintf_unfiltered (mi->event_channel, - "thread-group-added,id=\"i%d\"", - inf->num); - gdb_flush (mi->event_channel); - - return 0; -} - ui_out * mi_interp::interp_ui_out () { -- cgit v1.1