From 99f4262f2c7e3457f45bd9921889456285d8b025 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 02:07:50 -0600 Subject: fix incorrect comments in minsyms.h minsyms.h incorrectly claims that a couple of functions call prim_record_minimal_symbol_full with COPY_NAME=0 -- but actually they pass 1. Passing 1 is the correct behavior, so this patch fixes the documentation. I'm checking this in as obvious. 2014-06-16 Tom Tromey * minsyms.h (prim_record_minimal_symbol) (prim_record_minimal_symbol_and_info): Update comments. --- gdb/minsyms.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb/minsyms.h') diff --git a/gdb/minsyms.h b/gdb/minsyms.h index 289dcae..807e5ee 100644 --- a/gdb/minsyms.h +++ b/gdb/minsyms.h @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct minimal_symbol *prim_record_minimal_symbol_full /* Like prim_record_minimal_symbol_full, but: - uses strlen to compute NAME_LEN, - - passes COPY_NAME = 0, + - passes COPY_NAME = 1, - and passes a default SECTION, depending on the type This variant does not return the new symbol. */ @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ void prim_record_minimal_symbol (const char *, CORE_ADDR, /* Like prim_record_minimal_symbol_full, but: - uses strlen to compute NAME_LEN, - - passes COPY_NAME = 0. */ + - passes COPY_NAME = 1. */ struct minimal_symbol *prim_record_minimal_symbol_and_info (const char *, -- cgit v1.1