From 751f1375d662b14f8550bd4821d8fd76f308ef0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Kettenis Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:41:37 +0000 Subject: * i386-tdep.c (i386_extract_struct_value_address): Use regcache_raw_read_unsigned instead of regcache_cooked_read_unsigned since we know that the register we're reading isn't a pseudo register. Rename variable 'val' into the more descriptive 'addr'. --- gdb/i386-tdep.c | 22 +++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb/i386-tdep.c') diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c index 5a19308..252a9b7 100644 --- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c @@ -1039,25 +1039,17 @@ i386_store_return_value (struct type *type, struct regcache *regcache, } } -/* Extract from an array REGBUF containing the (raw) register state - the address in which a function should return its structure value, - as a CORE_ADDR. */ +/* Extract from REGCACHE, which contains the (raw) register state, the + address in which a function should return its structure value, as a + CORE_ADDR. */ static CORE_ADDR i386_extract_struct_value_address (struct regcache *regcache) { - /* NOTE: cagney/2002-08-12: Replaced a call to - regcache_raw_read_as_address() with a call to - regcache_cooked_read_unsigned(). The old, ...as_address function - was eventually calling extract_unsigned_integer (via - extract_address) to unpack the registers value. The below is - doing an unsigned extract so that it is functionally equivalent. - The read needs to be cooked as, otherwise, it will never - correctly return the value of a register in the [NUM_REGS - .. NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) range. */ - ULONGEST val; - regcache_cooked_read_unsigned (regcache, LOW_RETURN_REGNUM, &val); - return val; + ULONGEST addr; + + regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, LOW_RETURN_REGNUM, &addr); + return addr; } -- cgit v1.1